Purple People Eater wrote...
If you want real (but tasteful) nudity in your love scenes, please see the Witcher 2.
I intend to, not for the love scenes though. Sounds like an awesome game.
Purple People Eater wrote...
If you want real (but tasteful) nudity in your love scenes, please see the Witcher 2.
Wolven_Soul wrote...
Purple People Eater wrote...
If you want real (but tasteful) nudity in your love scenes, please see the Witcher 2.
I intend to, not for the love scenes though. Sounds like an awesome game.
AstraDrakkar wrote...
DA2 and ME3 were both a let down in the romance area because of all the ridiculous underwear scenes. They were so unrealistic. I realize Bioware can't use a "full monty" because of the rating restrictions but they really should loosen up a bit.
PorcelynDoll wrote...
It annoyed me most because Liara is nude in her love scene but heaven forbid Traynor, Ashley or FemShep be allowed nudity.
Modifié par Dendio1, 03 avril 2012 - 06:27 .
Wynne wrote...
In a way that completely avoided any meaningful breaking of censorship, since you can see any part of a woman you want and that's perfectly lovely as long as you don't see (GASP!) a MAN naked! Oh, no, that would be terrible. Because everyone knows that society would collapse from an avalanche of gay conversions if (SHUDDER!) Geralt actually had sex whilst naked! Insert Chuck Norris-style joke here!Dendio1 wrote...
I will forever respect CD projeckt Red for pioneering video games breaking censorship.
The witcher 2 people! excellent game
The Witcher 2 is one of the greatest culprits, since--like Traynor--Geralt has sex and takes a bath with his clothes on. Hell, he's wearing pants, not even just underwear.
There is this hilarious double standard. Notice how everyone says, "boobs" and "women" and "a nude woman" in these arguments and almost no one (if anyone) ever mentions men or their assets. Because those things are obviously evil, unlike breasts!
Maybe some of these soccer moms that people love to deride lived in a society where they could see that admiration of a nude body doesn't have to preclude respect for the person it belongs to--partly because media were equally generous to both male-attracted and female-attracted viewers, so they too can have a few little thrills and not just their teenage sons--then perhaps they would loosen up a little.
And before anybody asks, no, I don't have or want kids.I just think that change in society is only going to come when the issue stops being about how only women must be allowed to be naked. I think this censorship of female desires is directly related to the perception of women being sexless--rather than it actually being true, women just think they have to pretend they are if they want to be taken seriously in certain contexts. That should change. Then there would be fewer uptight women to complain about nudity in general because they would be seeing a picture of equal opportunity nudity, rather than just exploitation of their gender.
Realism only works if it works for both men and women. If one of the sexes remains clothed... well, that's both fetishy and unfair.
I'm personally not at all afraid of tasteful nudity--I don't at all mind if gentlemen and lesbians have the chance to admire the female form if I, other women, and gay men also have the chance to admire the male form. Mass Effect 1 wasn't bad on that count. Too bad Fox... well, everyone knows. *sigh*
PistolPete7556 wrote...
Ambelie wrote...
ACTUALLY, I know a decent amount of girls that will shower with the bra on. Good bras can be ridiculously expensive, they're the one thing you actually want to follow the washing instructions on. Since most of them say to hand wash and then drip dry I know a lot of girls who have just worn them in the shower to wash them, myself included, and then hang them on the certain rod to dry when they're done.
But still, this doesn't excuse the awkwardness of that scene.
Well...um... thanks for sharing
Wolven_Soul wrote...
Wynne wrote...
In a way that completely avoided any meaningful breaking of censorship, since you can see any part of a woman you want and that's perfectly lovely as long as you don't see (GASP!) a MAN naked! Oh, no, that would be terrible. Because everyone knows that society would collapse from an avalanche of gay conversions if (SHUDDER!) Geralt actually had sex whilst naked! Insert Chuck Norris-style joke here!Dendio1 wrote...
I will forever respect CD projeckt Red for pioneering video games breaking censorship.
The witcher 2 people! excellent game
The Witcher 2 is one of the greatest culprits, since--like Traynor--Geralt has sex and takes a bath with his clothes on. Hell, he's wearing pants, not even just underwear.
There is this hilarious double standard. Notice how everyone says, "boobs" and "women" and "a nude woman" in these arguments and almost no one (if anyone) ever mentions men or their assets. Because those things are obviously evil, unlike breasts!
Maybe some of these soccer moms that people love to deride lived in a society where they could see that admiration of a nude body doesn't have to preclude respect for the person it belongs to--partly because media were equally generous to both male-attracted and female-attracted viewers, so they too can have a few little thrills and not just their teenage sons--then perhaps they would loosen up a little.
And before anybody asks, no, I don't have or want kids.I just think that change in society is only going to come when the issue stops being about how only women must be allowed to be naked. I think this censorship of female desires is directly related to the perception of women being sexless--rather than it actually being true, women just think they have to pretend they are if they want to be taken seriously in certain contexts. That should change. Then there would be fewer uptight women to complain about nudity in general because they would be seeing a picture of equal opportunity nudity, rather than just exploitation of their gender.
Realism only works if it works for both men and women. If one of the sexes remains clothed... well, that's both fetishy and unfair.
I'm personally not at all afraid of tasteful nudity--I don't at all mind if gentlemen and lesbians have the chance to admire the female form if I, other women, and gay men also have the chance to admire the male form. Mass Effect 1 wasn't bad on that count. Too bad Fox... well, everyone knows. *sigh*
I agree, very well spoken.
Bizantura wrote...
I'm european but the prudery sometimes amuses me. In the past the creation kit bioware provided could cure this ridiculous problem but alas no more....
I am curious but a game like the witcher is that sanatized in the land of the free?
t_skwerl wrote...
Unlike ME1's news media controversy, I don't think this had anything to do with bad publicity. I do think it had everything to do with companies like Wal-Mart not stocking it if it had nudity in it. No developer is going to limit their sales like that.
So, don't blame conservative America or media on this one. Blame EA.
They're too scared of Fox News.JnEricsonx wrote...
Ok, lets be honest-how many times have you taken a shower with YOUR UNDERWEAR ON, seriously? Forget gratuitous nudity, or the like, there could have been plenty of non-revealing camera angles for that that make it apparent that one is showering in the proper fashion. Sigh.
JnEricsonx wrote...
Ok, lets be honest-how many times have you taken a shower with YOUR UNDERWEAR ON, seriously? Forget gratuitous nudity, or the like, there could have been plenty of non-revealing camera angles for that that make it apparent that one is showering in the proper fashion. Sigh.