CronoDragoon wrote...
I just don't like that she got a full 3D model and Tali got a picture.
This.
CronoDragoon wrote...
I just don't like that she got a full 3D model and Tali got a picture.
Nashiktal wrote...
Soaringeagle78 wrote...
I didn't really hate Allers. If anything I took her onboard the Normandy and just ignored her for the rest of the game, other than the interviews. The only thing that I'm remotely mad over is the fact that since Bioware took the time to do all of this for a cameo, imagine the time they could have taken to actually add on stuff that we wanted.(For me, more detailed LI interaction)
They put more effort into chobot, a character you barely interact with in ME3, than Tali, and by extension the quarian people.
Chobot gets a full character model in all its uncanney glory, Tali and the Quarians? A bad photoshop that removes some fingers and changes the skin tone.
I don't hate Chobot but I definitely did not approve of her presence in the game after that fact.
sfam wrote...
Ashilana wrote...
sfam wrote...
But she apologized. Like, she said she was sorry and over-reacted due to hurt feelings on her part. You get that there are thousands of you and only one of her, right? Like, forgive her already.
So you didn't like the VA - imagine how she feels being trashed for this as well. Again, she's probably human behind that keyboard - her pain has GOT to be far worse than ours. After all, we just got pissed that the game ending was a complete tangent having nothing to do with the previous 3 games - she's gotten publicly trashed across the internet.
And she got paid.
If you take money from people, then insult them, then apologize... guess what, they still get to be a little peeved. Especially if your role in the business seems like a severe conflict of interest to begin with.
If she had stayed silent about the game, she would be footnote in the whole mess. But now, I think anyone who writes a history of this who debacle will have to give her a big place in their summary of events.
I disagree. Nobody will remember anything about the Mass Effect series other than how Bioware was able to completely destroy one of the most awesome franchises with the last 5 minutes in the third game. Nothing else will ever be in the discussion.
But honestly, this is no different from CNN commentators being in political movies - its hardly a crazed conflict of interest of epic proportions. Her place in the summary of events will be a minor footnote at best.
But again, she apologized. What more would you have her do? Like really - that's kind of all you can do. I suppose a video of her groveling and eating pink slime or something might do it, but isn't an apology enough?
I think we all know Obama can voice act inb4 political ****storm.Foxhound2121 wrote...
Stanley Woo wrote...
No, she did not.Jealous Beauty wrote...
Out of curiosity, how did these forums react to Felicia Day in the DA2 DLC? Did she catch the same level of flak as Jessica Chobot?
Felicia Day is a good actress though. She has been doing it for a long time and has experience. You are getting a good voice actress for marketing reasons. A win win scenario.
Chobot was a real sacrifice for nothing more than marketing. No experience. Just a really bad deal when you lose value in your product for marketing.
Lessons to be learned for everyone. Barack Obama as a voice actor might be a good installment for marketing in Dragon Age 3, but if he can't act, he doesn't belong there.
Dendio1 wrote...
Stanley Woo wrote...
No, she did not.Jealous Beauty wrote...
Out of curiosity, how did these forums react to Felicia Day in the DA2 DLC? Did she catch the same level of flak as Jessica Chobot?
Well I for one am ashamed of the baseless flaming and hate speech directed upon poor Chobot.
Ashilana wrote...
sfam wrote...
I disagree. For starters, Bioware is a corporation, with lots of people, PR and management included who can craft an apology, whereas Jessica is a person, who admited being personally hurt by the attacks of her VA and participation. I found Bioware's apology lacking. I found Jessica's more than fine. I'm assuming she did it herself - and again, I'm just going out on a limb and assuming she's actually a human being with feelings and stuff - people hurt and embarrased or attacked don't always sound like slick PR folk or come up with completely contrite responses.
I'm just saying we should probably take her apology as just that and move the focus back to Bioware and the fiasco that the last 5 minutes brought.
I guess I am a little more harsh than you are when it comes to professional and unprofessional behavior. If she was just some random person posting on her blog, then yes, anything she says is fine (within the law). Yay for free speech. But since she is commenting on a project that she worked on as a professional, I don't think she is owed any concern from the public regarding her feelings.
That sounds horribly calous, but I think there is a reason why business and personal life should not mix.
+1KingKhan03 wrote...
CronoDragoon wrote...
I just don't like that she got a full 3D model and Tali got a picture.
This.
CronoDragoon wrote...
I just don't like that she got a full 3D model and Tali got a picture.
sfam wrote...
Ashilana wrote...
sfam wrote...
I disagree. For starters, Bioware is a corporation, with lots of people, PR and management included who can craft an apology, whereas Jessica is a person, who admited being personally hurt by the attacks of her VA and participation. I found Bioware's apology lacking. I found Jessica's more than fine. I'm assuming she did it herself - and again, I'm just going out on a limb and assuming she's actually a human being with feelings and stuff - people hurt and embarrased or attacked don't always sound like slick PR folk or come up with completely contrite responses.
I'm just saying we should probably take her apology as just that and move the focus back to Bioware and the fiasco that the last 5 minutes brought.
I guess I am a little more harsh than you are when it comes to professional and unprofessional behavior. If she was just some random person posting on her blog, then yes, anything she says is fine (within the law). Yay for free speech. But since she is commenting on a project that she worked on as a professional, I don't think she is owed any concern from the public regarding her feelings.
That sounds horribly calous, but I think there is a reason why business and personal life should not mix.
Cool. We differ on that, but what's the recourse you would like? She already apologized. If that's not enough than what is?
Ashilana wrote...
sfam wrote...
I disagree. For starters, Bioware is a corporation, with lots of people, PR and management included who can craft an apology, whereas Jessica is a person, who admited being personally hurt by the attacks of her VA and participation. I found Bioware's apology lacking. I found Jessica's more than fine. I'm assuming she did it herself - and again, I'm just going out on a limb and assuming she's actually a human being with feelings and stuff - people hurt and embarrased or attacked don't always sound like slick PR folk or come up with completely contrite responses.
I'm just saying we should probably take her apology as just that and move the focus back to Bioware and the fiasco that the last 5 minutes brought.
I guess I am a little more harsh than you are when it comes to professional and unprofessional behavior. If she was just some random person posting on her blog, then yes, anything she says is fine (within the law). Yay for free speech. But since she is commenting on a project that she worked on as a professional, I don't think she is owed any concern from the public regarding her feelings.
That sounds horribly calous, but I think there is a reason why business and personal life should not mix.
ghostbusters101 wrote...
Sadly, it is an issue of trust and credibility. I can only hope this lesson does not haunt her. People have been fired for making stupid comments. She is in the public eye and she represents a corporation. I’m sure her HR department had advised all employees to be careful of what they say in public.
To answer your question getting on her knee and begging isn’t the answer. Some people may continue to trust and others may not. There is a difference between accepting an apology and trusting an individual that has compromised their position by not being impartial.
I wish her well.
ghostbusters101 wrote...
Any customer has the right not to take her seriously, and not to listen to her. That is typically the recourse. The second recourse it that customers may tune out the company she works for.
I find that you are way too emotional.
Welcome to capitalism. Customers can choose who they trust.
sfam wrote...
+1KingKhan03 wrote...
CronoDragoon wrote...
I just don't like that she got a full 3D model and Tali got a picture.
This.
Modifié par T-Zero, 03 avril 2012 - 04:51 .
Stanley Woo wrote...
No, she did not.Jealous Beauty wrote...
Out of curiosity, how did these forums react to Felicia Day in the DA2 DLC? Did she catch the same level of flak as Jessica Chobot?
Landamskarn wrote...
I thought this was going to be about the voice acting.
chiliztri wrote...
Me tooLandamskarn wrote...
I thought this was going to be about the voice acting.
This comment you made " Cool. We differ on that, but what's the recourse you would like? She already apologized. If that's not enough than what is?" It seems very emotional. It is not about accepting an appology, but about hounding the person you sent this to.sfam wrote...
ghostbusters101 wrote...
Any customer has the right not to take her seriously, and not to listen to her. That is typically the recourse. The second recourse it that customers may tune out the company she works for.
I find that you are way too emotional.
Welcome to capitalism. Customers can choose who they trust.
I'm way too emotional for accepting someone's apology at face value?
Um, OK.
And clealry customers can choose anything they want for any reason. I just think the piling on has gone well overboard.
ghostbusters101 wrote...
This comment you made " Cool. We differ on that, but what's the recourse you would like? She already apologized. If that's not enough than what is?" It seems very emotional. It is not about accepting an appology, but about hounding the person you sent this to.sfam wrote...
ghostbusters101 wrote...
Any customer has the right not to take her seriously, and not to listen to her. That is typically the recourse. The second recourse it that customers may tune out the company she works for.
I find that you are way too emotional.
Welcome to capitalism. Customers can choose who they trust.
I'm way too emotional for accepting someone's apology at face value?
Um, OK.
And clealry customers can choose anything they want for any reason. I just think the piling on has gone well overboard.
Secondly, customers can choose who they want to listen to. Exactly.
Modifié par sfam, 03 avril 2012 - 04:28 .
Ibn_Shisha wrote...
Stanley Woo wrote...
No, she did not.Jealous Beauty wrote...
Out of curiosity, how did these forums react to Felicia Day in the DA2 DLC? Did she catch the same level of flak as Jessica Chobot?
Did Felicia Day call us names for airing legitimate customer concerns? I don't really know, but I've never heard anything about her doing so.
nwj94 wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
Justin2k wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
To be fair I haven't seen anything other than people being perfectly civil to Merizan.
Annoyingly persistent in bugging her about things she obviously can't know, but civil.
A member of your retake group threatened to kill her on twitter.
Sigh..thats just sad
There are wierdo's in every group. The retake movement did not condone this of course.