Gigamantis wrote...
I have no problem with you voicing your opinion, it's just being taken too far. It's a rather embarrassing time to be part of this community.Serp86 wrote...
Gigamantis wrote...
The game was completed; which is why any new content will be supplemental. There's no necessity to wrap up everything in a story, especially when supplemental content is assumed. There are even books out there that leave open-ended talking points purposely.Serp86 wrote...
Gigamantis wrote...
In a game that was guaranteed to have DLC I don't mind that at all. The game we have is coming and supplemental content is on the way for those who want more. It's not over yet, skippy.Serp86 wrote...
Gigamantis wrote...
Again, some plot-holes aren't the end of the world in what was an otherwise moving and intense ending. It's about being a fan without being a psychotic about it. It makes everything much more enjoyable.KevShep wrote...
Gigamantis wrote...
Yes, I know. Blah blah need more explanation. Blah blah I'm sad because everyone died and my choices didn't change the ending enough to make me less sad in future playthroughs.
The ending was the most well produced and moving one in the entire series. Definitely a fitting conclusion.
I'm all for lobbying to fill in a few of the plotholes with explanations, maybe in future DLC, but man can you people overreact like no one else on the planet. They had better not change the ending. The game was fantastic.
Someone that is ether a troll or some "fan" that does not care about the plot holes and inconsistencies in the last 5 min of the game.
How do you justify an ending to a triology that won't be continued that leaves so many open question ? The worst part about it that these question only come up because the ending was so flawed. Up until the ending everything was fine for the most part. Then it was hmm what the hell just happened ?
Most questions of the ME series get answered up until the endings basically just leaves you with a bunch of new ones and gives you zero information.
DLC's are supposed to provide bonus content and not complete a game.... Thats just shady buisness. Releasing content that should've been in the game to begin with to grab some more money out of peoples pockets is just low.
Whatever the explanations are you'll get them without buying the DLC anyways; they'll be on the internet within minutes. You just choose whether or not to experience this additional supplement. It's all perfectly reasonable, especially when the original game itself is well worth it's retail price, which ME3 was.
The game does not feel complete right now. There are at least 3-5 major bugs that you can see after beeing hit by the beam that def should be fixed for example. Not to mention the Normandy sequence that doesn't make any sense at all . If a company wants to skim the most money of their loyal fanbase they can do that if they like but they shouldn't expect people to keep their mouth shut and buy all the crap they release. Pissing off a fanbase will hurt in the long run.
You should really all just admit the game was fantastic and talk rationally about ways to improve the ending. It would make you look like people with real perspective who's opinions should be valued. Most of you are just being irrational.
I admit the ME3 itsself for the most part was good but the ending was by far the worst of the three and thats not even up for a debate. Hell even the devs know it otherwise they wouldn't be so quick to cave in and change/ extend the ending. The only thing the ME3 ending had was a fancy CGI. But i don't give a **** about a great looking CGI if it makes no sense. Even a wall of text would've been better if it made sense. I have enough imagination to work with that.
Modifié par Serp86, 03 avril 2012 - 02:43 .
Retour en haut
