Aller au contenu

Photo

EA says it's official: no DLC for new ending


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1158 réponses à ce sujet

#676
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages
Bad grumpy teacher says : "When you get older, you understand, now do as you're told, be realistic and stop daydreaming"

Good old teacher says : "There's always hope, be yourself, enjoy life and create your bright future now!"

I might be older than the majority here, but I will never stop being myself because someone would like me to. Anyone who is not satisfied with the endings or even anything about this game is totally, absolutely entitled to express it, stomping his feet or crying for it. As long as respect remains in line.

Modifié par Iconoclaste, 03 avril 2012 - 04:29 .


#677
PsychoWARD23

PsychoWARD23
  • Members
  • 2 401 messages

durasteel wrote...

Railarian wrote...

If they decided to leave it as is, they'll confirm at PAX. Then we throw cupcakes at them...


No, don't  be rude, just get up and leave.

BioWare has the right to stick with their ending and become the developer we used to really like, just as we have the right to find better things to do with our time and money. Go down the hall and see what kind of swag the Diablo III booth is giving away. See if Bethesda has footage of their new sci-fi bounty hunter game, the trailer was really cool last year.

It would be a shame if BioWare chose to waste this opportunity, but it is legitimately their choice to make.

Bethesda's sci-fi bounty hunter game got cancelled. :/

#678
Aurvant

Aurvant
  • Members
  • 372 messages
About 3 months ago I would have told you that Bioware could do no wrong and that I was extremely excited about Mass Effect 3. I'd have also told you that I was waiting patiently for a new Dragon Age, and that an announcement for DAIII would have probably blown my pants off.

Now though? Ugh....

I can see it now. The ending to DAIII comes about after the Warden AND Hawke have to sacrifice themselves by blowing each other up after snorting ridiculous amounts of raw lirium.

They then explode from the lirium which then burns Flemeth to death (who will, no doubt, be revealed to be some ancient Arch-demon or devil person that controls the Darkspawn or something) and then Flemeth's death causes an even bigger explosion of more lirium (there's lots of this stuff around I suppose) and 95% of Ferelden and the Free Marches are reduced to nothing more than a razed wasteland.

And then Anders will complain about it.

The End.

#679
DamonD7

DamonD7
  • Members
  • 769 messages
Like I said earlier, I'm still waiting for PAX - there's no guarantee that this guy is fully in the loop with most recent events, could be working off the old PR line (it really does sound like PR lines) for one thing.

At least speaking for myself, still keeping patient and calm here.

#680
MoirDing

MoirDing
  • Members
  • 23 messages
Oh wow, kind of saw this coming, but was hoping for the best.

OP's source might have old information or the source could have been trolled, but if this is even remotely true... Damn... I'm done then. I'm guessing they're extending the "You're a legend now LOL HUZZA!" with something like "Oh yeah, no blue babies, everyone you know is deaaaaad and Earth now houses a large number of starving aliens.

Lol.

PS: Space magic."

My first ever (26 years old fyi) collector's edition. "Hey, it's Bioware." I thought. "It's Mass Effect! I even own the darn SSV Normandy miniature!" I thought. Now I'm thinking about sending it back across the Antlantic if this turns out to be true.

For now, I'm awaiting an official response. No definitive conclusion te be had for now,

cdn2.mamapop.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/dis_gonna_b_gud.gif

Modifié par MoirDing, 03 avril 2012 - 04:31 .


#681
Joykilledme

Joykilledme
  • Members
  • 130 messages

Mnementh2230 wrote...

I'm waiting for PAX to confirm, but this is bull****.

The ending is still bull****. It's not "victorious and uplifting" - it's a departure to straight fantasy that insults the intelligent player. It's a direct rip-off of the available endings from Deus Ex, but without any reason to accept it as valid. It's full of plot holes, and provides no closure. None of our actions up to that point make the slightest bit of different, and it's exactly what we were told we *WOULD NOT* get (an A/B/C ending).

Bioware, this ending is ruining your reputation among your fans.

Leave it alone at your peril - you will lose customers over this, and you will eventually be dissolved as a studio to feed EA's sports division (and their massive employee turnover). Do you want that? No. Do we want that? No. Fix the damn endings.


Couldn't have said it better myself! 

#682
DOsquareZER

DOsquareZER
  • Members
  • 2 054 messages

durasteel wrote...

The ending was not "fine." Even if you discount the many detailed arguments, many of which have been presented in an accessible video format, which specify the ways in which it lacked narrative cohesion, failed to address the central conflict and central theme of the story that had unfolded in the game and across the trilogy, and was riddles with plot holes and internal contradictions, you cannot avoid the fundamental truth that it failed in the sense that it has alienated many fans of the franchise.

My criticism was constructive, and so was that of most of us. With few exceptions, we have pointed out the shortcomings of the existing ending in ways that make it easy to avoid similar missteps in the future. People really only began to suggest specific story elements when that feedback was expressly asked for by BioWare representatives, and even than many or most of us were clear that we didn't want to write the ending ourselves, we wanted a coherent, BioWare-class ending. The reason that the ending so completely fails is at least in part because BioWare has set a standard for their stories that is quite high--they're good at this, which makes an abysmally poor ending like this unacceptable.

We paid $60/100$ for a complete BioWare game. What we got was a BioWare game with a what-the-hell-was-that ending where we all secretly wish it was just a bad dream. It is perfectly reasonable to demand that the developer finish the product as advertised and maintain a certain level of quality if it wishes to continue to enjoy our pre-order and launch-day patronage.

What makes your entire argument so obnoxious and infantile is that you seem to be insisting that we should just continue to buy everything with a BioWare logo on it without demanding that those products consistently meet the level of quality and entertainment value that caused us to be customers and fans in the first place. You have failed and continue to fail to understand the "retake" effort for what it is:

We're giving BioWare a chance.

The alternative, in the real world which you seem unable to live in, would be to say "well, that sucked, and I'm done." All the people you see on the forums who disliked the endings would be gone, and until they managed to re-establish some artistic credibility BioWare games would release with very tepid numbers as customers very reasonably waited to see whether each game would present another deadline-rushed mess. If the game was well reviewed by actual players, sales would pick up... but the pre-order and collector's edition numbers would not be making the company very happy at all.

Because we are genuine fans, we're not rushing to that point. We're communicating clearly what BioWare can do to avoid that, to keep us per-ordering their games and collector's editions, to preserve their artistic credibility. If that's not constructive, what is?

For you to come into a thread like this and start your name-calling and snide pejorative assertions only underscores the clear fact that you don't understand what the hell you're talking about. Either you have never bothered to think about this issue before hammering your ignorant opinion out on your keyboard, or you simply lack the capacity to understand it except in the oversimplified, unsophisticated terms in which you frame your "argument." Which one is it?


^ <_< This.  And Signed.  Well said.

#683
guvnordisney

guvnordisney
  • Members
  • 4 messages
Daniel Gonzalez from EA Latin America is either going to be seriously reprimanded or fired for making an "official" statement before EA or, more importantly, BioWare. It is especially stupid considering his statement contradicts Ray Muzyka's earlier statement that more news would be coming later this month. Gonzalez is an idiot. Don't believe anything until you hear it straight from BioWare, Edmonton.

#684
Gigamantis

Gigamantis
  • Members
  • 738 messages

What makes your entire argument so obnoxious and infantile is that you seem to be insisting that we should just continue to buy everything with a BioWare logo on it without demanding that those products consistently meet the level of quality and entertainment value that caused us to be customers and fans in the first place. You have failed and continue to fail to understand the "retake" effort for what it is:

The vast majority of the reaction to the ending was review bombings and forum spam. Every time someone claims to enjoy the ending there are 50 people waiting to call them a troll and chase them off the forums. You people really don't deserve to have your conduct validated in any way, and in any other facet of life it wouldn't be. I'm sorry, but you can't claim very few rational people in your camp as the majority just because you think it validates you. This collective effort from all of you deserves to be ignored because of how it was conducted.

The alternative, in the real world which you seem unable to live in, would be to say "well, that sucked, and I'm done." All the people you see on the forums who disliked the endings would be gone, and until they managed to re-establish some artistic credibility BioWare games would release with very tepid numbers as customers very reasonably waited to see whether each game would present another deadline-rushed mess. If the game was well reviewed by actual players, sales would pick up... but the pre-order and collector's edition numbers would not be making the company very happy at all.

Because we are genuine fans, we're not rushing to that point. We're communicating clearly what BioWare can do to avoid that, to keep us per-ordering their games and collector's editions, to preserve their artistic credibility. If that's not constructive, what is?

For you to come into a thread like this and start your name-calling and snide pejorative assertions only underscores the clear fact that you don't understand what the hell you're talking about. Either you have never bothered to think about this issue before hammering your ignorant opinion out on your keyboard, or you simply lack the capacity to understand it except in the oversimplified, unsophisticated terms in which you fram your "argument." Which one is it?

I've discussed the issue in other threads and it is HARDLY the monstrosity you all make it out to be. In the end your attempts at being constructive are overwhelmed and ultimately made irrelevant by your complete lack of emotional levity. Even in this post where you're "trying" to come off as rational and constructive you make broad assertions about the quality of the ending based on nothing. I've read the articles and seen the videos as well, so don't bother linking them.

This thread isn't about the quality of the ending, though, it's discussing what is perceived to be Bioware's decision on this matter. I support it because I liked the ending and because of the horrible way the fans conducted themselves, and I'm talking about the majority of you.

#685
SlyTF1

SlyTF1
  • Members
  • 383 messages
As long as the indoctrination theory is right and I get the ending where Shepard breathes once, and he actually lives, I'm fine with it. And Shepard had damn well better be on the Normandy when it crashes on that planet. If my squad is stranded on a God forsaken island planet to starve to deth, by hell we all starve to death TOGETHER!!!

#686
Kitedtk

Kitedtk
  • Members
  • 169 messages

doozer12 wrote...

durasteel wrote...

The ending was not "fine." Even if you discount the many detailed arguments, many of which have been presented in an accessible video format, which specify the ways in which it lacked narrative cohesion, failed to address the central conflict and central theme of the story that had unfolded in the game and across the trilogy, and was riddles with plot holes and internal contradictions, you cannot avoid the fundamental truth that it failed in the sense that it has alienated many fans of the franchise.

My criticism was constructive, and so was that of most of us. With few exceptions, we have pointed out the shortcomings of the existing ending in ways that make it easy to avoid similar missteps in the future. People really only began to suggest specific story elements when that feedback was expressly asked for by BioWare representatives, and even than many or most of us were clear that we didn't want to write the ending ourselves, we wanted a coherent, BioWare-class ending. The reason that the ending so completely fails is at least in part because BioWare has set a standard for their stories that is quite high--they're good at this, which makes an abysmally poor ending like this unacceptable.

We paid $60/100$ for a complete BioWare game. What we got was a BioWare game with a what-the-hell-was-that ending where we all secretly wish it was just a bad dream. It is perfectly reasonable to demand that the developer finish the product as advertised and maintain a certain level of quality if it wishes to continue to enjoy our pre-order and launch-day patronage.

What makes your entire argument so obnoxious and infantile is that you seem to be insisting that we should just continue to buy everything with a BioWare logo on it without demanding that those products consistently meet the level of quality and entertainment value that caused us to be customers and fans in the first place. You have failed and continue to fail to understand the "retake" effort for what it is:

We're giving BioWare a chance.

The alternative, in the real world which you seem unable to live in, would be to say "well, that sucked, and I'm done." All the people you see on the forums who disliked the endings would be gone, and until they managed to re-establish some artistic credibility BioWare games would release with very tepid numbers as customers very reasonably waited to see whether each game would present another deadline-rushed mess. If the game was well reviewed by actual players, sales would pick up... but the pre-order and collector's edition numbers would not be making the company very happy at all.

Because we are genuine fans, we're not rushing to that point. We're communicating clearly what BioWare can do to avoid that, to keep us per-ordering their games and collector's editions, to preserve their artistic credibility. If that's not constructive, what is?

For you to come into a thread like this and start your name-calling and snide pejorative assertions only underscores the clear fact that you don't understand what the hell you're talking about. Either you have never bothered to think about this issue before hammering your ignorant opinion out on your keyboard, or you simply lack the capacity to understand it except in the oversimplified, unsophisticated terms in which you frame your "argument." Which one is it?


^ <_< This.  And Signed.  Well said.

also seconded and signed.

#687
Fliprot

Fliprot
  • Members
  • 276 messages
So.. Shepard goes out in with a cowering whimper as he gives in to the reapers and does their job for them?

#688
omphaloskepsis

omphaloskepsis
  • Members
  • 133 messages

Iconoclaste wrote...

BaladasDemnevanni wrote...

chuckwells62 wrote...

Ray Muzyka (co-founder/Bioware): “I just finished an end to end playthrough, for me the ending was the most satisfying of any game I’ve ever played….the decisions you make in this game are epic,” “The team has been planning for this for years, since the beginning of the Mass Effect franchise. Largely the same team, most of the same leads have worked on this for years and years. They’ve thought about [the ending] for years and years. It’s not something they’ve had to solve in a week or a month even, but over the course of five or ten years.”


Wow. I honestly forgot about that statement. I wish I could have had his reaction.

Generational bias : older people generally accept more easily than younger people the notions of "ending", for obvious reasons... But that shall never, never give elders any autority to impose such things as sacrifice, surrender faith or hope upon the younger generations. It just looks like the world we live in : younger generations forced to make hearthbreaking choices because past generations just did not care for the future like they cared for themselves.

I'm "older" and all I see the above is a PR statement aimed at crowd control.

The original Mass Effect lead writer left the team during ME2, and Bioware/EA later.  There was a leaked ending that actually made sense, and there are rumors with more than a hint of legitimacy that the ending was written without feedback from most of the writers.  If the end wasn't so B-movie/MST3K bad, it would be easy to take these PR statements at face value.  As it is, the management seems to be either engaged in a bungling PR war, or so lacking in talent and judgement that they shouldn't be making "artistic" decisions.

#689
Bomma72

Bomma72
  • Members
  • 596 messages

Joykilledme wrote...

Mnementh2230 wrote...

I'm waiting for PAX to confirm, but this is bull****.

The ending is still bull****. It's not "victorious and uplifting" - it's a departure to straight fantasy that insults the intelligent player. It's a direct rip-off of the available endings from Deus Ex, but without any reason to accept it as valid. It's full of plot holes, and provides no closure. None of our actions up to that point make the slightest bit of different, and it's exactly what we were told we *WOULD NOT* get (an A/B/C ending).

Bioware, this ending is ruining your reputation among your fans.

Leave it alone at your peril - you will lose customers over this, and you will eventually be dissolved as a studio to feed EA's sports division (and their massive employee turnover). Do you want that? No. Do we want that? No. Fix the damn endings.


Couldn't have said it better myself! 


And all the insiders who are saying don't fix the ending just for entitled fans, it hurts art / industry / puppies and all that stuff will later be the first ones to say that the ending was a disaster and contributed to your demise.  They all change their tune and say this was not the way to handle the fans.  Just watch.

#690
Chanvree

Chanvree
  • Members
  • 45 messages

guvnordisney wrote...

Daniel Gonzalez from EA Latin America is either going to be seriously reprimanded or fired for making an "official" statement before EA or, more importantly, BioWare. It is especially stupid considering his statement contradicts Ray Muzyka's earlier statement that more news would be coming later this month. Gonzalez is an idiot. Don't believe anything until you hear it straight from BioWare, Edmonton.


He is from marketing and I doubt he knew what Bioware truly plans to do.  Hence why he based his whole estament is about financing of the ending. 

Modifié par Chanvree, 03 avril 2012 - 04:37 .


#691
CaliGuy033

CaliGuy033
  • Members
  • 382 messages

SlyTF1 wrote...

As long as the indoctrination theory is right and I get the ending where Shepard breathes once, and he actually lives, I'm fine with it. And Shepard had damn well better be on the Normandy when it crashes on that planet. If my squad is stranded on a God forsaken island planet to starve to deth, by hell we all starve to death TOGETHER!!!


As long as I can have exactly what I want, I'm fine with it.

#692
Occulo

Occulo
  • Members
  • 472 messages

Sarevok Synder wrote...

M25105 wrote...
Look, I want the ending to change too. But the racism here in this thread is disgusting.

Huh?

It's scattered throughout the thread, people saying they won't believe it because it's specifically a Mexican newspaper or that it's in Spanish. It's really weird. I understand not believing it because you've never heard of the paper, you have doubts EA's other arms know what they're talking about, and/or you'd rather hear it directly from BioWare--but not because it's specifically from Mexico. It's odd to me because I don't remember the sexbox controversy coming from that country.

#693
Kitedtk

Kitedtk
  • Members
  • 169 messages
Giga... just stop... please just stop. You're making yourself ridiculous now. The points your trying to raise are rather silly... Also... if the ratio of like and dislike of the ending is 1:50... then quite clearly... it's a bad ending...

The games ending was a mockery of what the entire series stood for.

#694
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages
BREAKING NEWS: An EA PR guy who wouldn't KNOW anything (and would be under an NDA if he did) tows the company line.

THIS JUST IN: Scientists confirm that rain is wet.

#695
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

guvnordisney wrote...

Daniel Gonzalez from EA Latin America is either going to be seriously reprimanded or fired for making an "official" statement before EA or, more importantly, BioWare. It is especially stupid considering his statement contradicts Ray Muzyka's earlier statement that more news would be coming later this month. Gonzalez is an idiot. Don't believe anything until you hear it straight from BioWare, Edmonton.


This.

I don't want things scrapped. I actually want more clarification (IT? Something else... everything past beam/Shep's breakdown strikes me as unreal... Shep in her/his right mind would NEVER shoot Anderson in the gut....TIM even mentions the "power they have"....) and ADDITIONAL content, no retcons. An added epilogue too...  Again, I do not want the game drastically altered.

#696
Ashilana

Ashilana
  • Members
  • 973 messages

Kitedtk wrote...

Giga... just stop... please just stop. You're making yourself ridiculous now. The points your trying to raise are rather silly... Also... if the ratio of like and dislike of the ending is 1:50... then quite clearly... it's a bad ending...

The games ending was a mockery of what the entire series stood for.


He is just trolling.  Attempting to reason with him is not going to go anywhere.   Unfortunately, he seems to be on the same page as bioware.  They seem to think they can clarify why they think the "endings" weren't trash.

#697
SlyTF1

SlyTF1
  • Members
  • 383 messages

The Angry One wrote...

BREAKING NEWS: An EA PR guy who wouldn't KNOW anything (and would be under an NDA if he did) tows the company line.

THIS JUST IN: Scientists confirm that rain is wet.


Oh damn!

#698
Dessalines

Dessalines
  • Members
  • 607 messages
Wait, I think the opening post was bull, but I did not think they were going to do a whole new ending, unless they already had it planned

#699
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages

Gigamantis wrote...

This thread isn't about the quality of the ending, though, it's discussing what is perceived to be Bioware's decision on this matter. I support it because I liked the ending and because of the horrible way the fans conducted themselves, and I'm talking about the majority of you.

So, you support the "bad endings" to "punish" the people who expressed their feelings?

#700
Ruari

Ruari
  • Members
  • 346 messages

guvnordisney wrote...

Daniel Gonzalez from EA Latin America is either going to be seriously reprimanded or fired for making an "official" statement before EA or, more importantly, BioWare. It is especially stupid considering his statement contradicts Ray Muzyka's earlier statement that more news would be coming later this month. Gonzalez is an idiot. Don't believe anything until you hear it straight from BioWare, Edmonton.


Well early on in this mess BW tried to "test the waters" with semi-official statements on their Facebook and Twitter accounts. But after the rage swarmed them they took the posts down and said they didn't really mean it. I suspect this may be EA doing something similar, but perhaps doing it in a more traditional medium with a mouthpiece that has some authority (at least more than random, faceless social media poster). To me, it's not official until the organization states the facts, not a lone person who happens to work within the organization.

On a funny side note, I feel like this is happening to Bioware right now.