Aller au contenu

Photo

EA says it's official: no DLC for new ending


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1158 réponses à ce sujet

#1126
Njald

Njald
  • Members
  • 298 messages
What clarification do Bioware think they can offer us?
"This ending is poorly written and disconnected from playing the game"
Gee, thanks. We couldn't figure that one out by ourselves.
We did not get to play thru an ending. One was thrust upon us.
No amount of exposition will change that. The only thing that actually changes that is an ending we can PLAY thru. We want OUR Shepard there, making the choices OUR Shepard will make, with consequences OUR Shepard have to face.

This is the core of it and Bioware Have to know this by now or they are insanely deluded.

Modifié par Njald, 04 avril 2012 - 04:06 .


#1127
evillamor

evillamor
  • Members
  • 12 messages
I think people are crucifying Bioware for being quiet about what they planned to do about everything. I think there is no need to be angry until they announced their plan of action and turns out it sucks, not before. If I read through the forums, its like people are angry about anticipating what EA and Bioware is going to do.

#1128
Rhz

Rhz
  • Members
  • 125 messages

2. The catalyst was afraid that synthetics he wasn't controlling would turn on organics and wipe them out. The reapers are the catalysts tools and he's clearly something beyond usual organics.


haha come on this is so hilarious, he is afraid that other synthetics would wipe out organics so he created synthetics by himself to kill organics under his command, why is he doing this? - and with why is he doing is I'm not satisfied with the answer "to store organic life into reaper form".

Modifié par Rhz, 04 avril 2012 - 04:28 .


#1129
Demonhoopa

Demonhoopa
  • Members
  • 702 messages

Iconoclaste wrote...

Demonhoopa wrote...

Iconoclaste wrote...

The Catalyst might be lying.


The response of the "desperate to believe".

LOL. I'll leave you to it then. Image IPB

It's been adressed in IT already. Long thread there to read.


A long thread that is no doubt loaded with impressive nuggets like "The Catalyst might be lying" Image IPBImage IPBImage IPB

Find by me. Not my business how other people waste their time.

Modifié par Demonhoopa, 04 avril 2012 - 04:35 .


#1130
Gigamantis

Gigamantis
  • Members
  • 738 messages

Rhz wrote...

2. The catalyst was afraid that synthetics he wasn't controlling would turn on organics and wipe them out. The reapers are the catalysts tools and he's clearly something beyond usual organics.


haha come on this is so hilarious, he is afraid that other synthetics would wipe out organics so he created synthetics by himself to kill organics under his command, why is he doing this? - and with why is he doing is I'm not satisfied with the answer "to store organic life into reaper form".

Controlling the reapers is the only way he can cleanse the galaxy so he made them out of necessity.  He still has control over them so he doesn't fear what they'll do.  He can't control the synthetics created by organics and believes they will turn on their creators. 

#1131
Rhz

Rhz
  • Members
  • 125 messages

Gigamantis wrote...

Rhz wrote...

2. The catalyst was afraid that synthetics he wasn't controlling would turn on organics and wipe them out. The reapers are the catalysts tools and he's clearly something beyond usual organics.


haha come on this is so hilarious, he is afraid that other synthetics would wipe out organics so he created synthetics by himself to kill organics under his command, why is he doing this? - and with why is he doing is I'm not satisfied with the answer "to store organic life into reaper form".

Controlling the reapers is the only way he can cleanse the galaxy so he made them out of necessity.  He still has control over them so he doesn't fear what they'll do.  He can't control the synthetics created by organics and believes they will turn on their creators. 


The battle for Rannoch disproves his assertion.

and the fact that I cant argue with him a bit (I can understand if its intended that hes not going to answer any of my questions) proves that this ending was rushed. I.e. if you wer able to save the quarian and the geth you should at least be able to say --- look out there quarian and geth ships fighting side by side against your reapers - even if he says then "You're human, your argument is invalid" would be enough but you cant do **** and that upsets me.

Modifié par Rhz, 04 avril 2012 - 05:58 .


#1132
logan23tom78

logan23tom78
  • Members
  • 152 messages
This EA might not know anything..EA writes the budget checks- but unless this EA Rep is part of the actual ME3 development oversee team,....I would say just wait for PAX.

PAX will give us an idea what Bioware plans to do...till then..

Hold the Line!

#1133
whoisthis98

whoisthis98
  • Members
  • 151 messages
Listen they bioware thinks it's customers are tools who will buy whatever crap they sell. Look at cod numbers ( what they want ) same bad game every time and sales go up up up. They know that in the next game at the end it could go to a white screen at the end that says Thanks for paying us you worthless fool now pay us an extra 20 bucks every time you want to re load in our tacted on lousy multiplayer..... and guess what. You will buy it and you will pay them so they are right.    ONLY way they fix the endings and lets be clear it needs fixing is if NO ONE buys anything from them ever again. Only way to teach a company a lesson is to hurt their wallet. THAT is all they feel.

Artistic integrity is BS.  As Ebert said gamnes are not art  and thanks to companys like ea they never will be. Do not indulge them on micro transactions and do not buy any future products. I'd say stop playing swtor too but everyone already did LOL.

Then when EA closes biowares doors and examines why..... they HOPEFULLY take notice as to why and make sure it doesn't happen again.   Until people do this it will continue to be all down hill.

#1134
Lisa_H

Lisa_H
  • Members
  • 694 messages
Well, if the endings are not changed they can release all ME stuff they want. I won't buy it.

#1135
Fazumar

Fazumar
  • Members
  • 15 messages
Hold. The. Line.

#1136
Japkap79

Japkap79
  • Members
  • 102 messages
They said no DLC with alternate ending what about a patch!!!

#1137
WatchTheGrass

WatchTheGrass
  • Members
  • 40 messages
Welp.

Better start dusting off that line.

#1138
HellFox2010

HellFox2010
  • Members
  • 29 messages
Not entirely surprised if this is the case. But yeah I most likely will move on from the Mass Effect series if they can't effectively resolve it. My sentiments pretty much match the rest of those upset by the endings, although I haven't been vocal about it.

#1139
Doom Lich

Doom Lich
  • Members
  • 347 messages
Congratulations Bioware/EA. If this turns out to be true you can be damn sure I won't buy any other Mass Effect titles you release in the future. I certainly won't want to invest any more in this universe if you leave it as is.

And you can be damn sure they'll make more titles in set in the mass effect universe.

PhrosniteAgainROFL wrote...
Even 100k are a minority
considering the game sold millions of copies(3.5mil shipped). Let's not
start a fight here. These are the cold facts. This is like boycotting
the CoD games because they are basically the same. People are still
going to buy them.


I love when people say things like
this, because I get to pull out a quote from one of my favorite forum
moderators. (Not from here)

{MikeyG} wrote...
If every time someone said "it's a fact" or such actually backed that up, my eyebrow would far less of a workout.



Image IPB



Seriously now, is this a fact-fact or an out-of-the-ass fact?


Modifié par Doom Lich, 04 avril 2012 - 06:54 .


#1140
Doom Lich

Doom Lich
  • Members
  • 347 messages
ignore me

Modifié par Doom Lich, 04 avril 2012 - 06:54 .


#1141
Doom Lich

Doom Lich
  • Members
  • 347 messages
Whoops, double post.

#1142
Baihu1983

Baihu1983
  • Members
  • 1 765 messages
If thats the case then EA can kiss my money goodbye.

#1143
Skyblade012

Skyblade012
  • Members
  • 1 336 messages

Njald wrote...

What clarification do Bioware think they can offer us?
"This ending is poorly written and disconnected from playing the game"
Gee, thanks. We couldn't figure that one out by ourselves.
We did not get to play thru an ending. One was thrust upon us.
No amount of exposition will change that. The only thing that actually changes that is an ending we can PLAY thru. We want OUR Shepard there, making the choices OUR Shepard will make, with consequences OUR Shepard have to face.

This is the core of it and Bioware Have to know this by now or they are insanely deluded.


Agreed.

#1144
k8ee

k8ee
  • Members
  • 592 messages
I heard that the mass effect twitter account is denying this whole no new endings "announcement". Anyone know if this is true?

#1145
Gigamantis

Gigamantis
  • Members
  • 738 messages

Rhz wrote...

Gigamantis wrote...

Rhz wrote...

2. The catalyst was afraid that synthetics he wasn't controlling would turn on organics and wipe them out. The reapers are the catalysts tools and he's clearly something beyond usual organics.


haha come on this is so hilarious, he is afraid that other synthetics would wipe out organics so he created synthetics by himself to kill organics under his command, why is he doing this? - and with why is he doing is I'm not satisfied with the answer "to store organic life into reaper form".

Controlling the reapers is the only way he can cleanse the galaxy so he made them out of necessity.  He still has control over them so he doesn't fear what they'll do.  He can't control the synthetics created by organics and believes they will turn on their creators. 


The battle for Rannoch disproves his assertion.

and the fact that I cant argue with him a bit (I can understand if its intended that hes not going to answer any of my questions) proves that this ending was rushed. I.e. if you wer able to save the quarian and the geth you should at least be able to say --- look out there quarian and geth ships fighting side by side against your reapers - even if he says then "You're human, your argument is invalid" would be enough but you cant do **** and that upsets me.

The battle for Rannoch doesn't dissprove anything.  One instance of synthetic and organic cooperating doesn't mean future conflicts won't arise and synthetics won't eventually overtake organics.  Giving the catalyst a pointless anecdote isn't going to change anything.  The catalyst has been around forever and has seen the cycle before, and you haven't.  It knows better than you do. 

Modifié par Gigamantis, 04 avril 2012 - 07:13 .


#1146
Maryxus

Maryxus
  • Members
  • 2 messages
o_o The ending, while bad, wasn't so bad that it invalidates how awesome everything was up until that point. I've been a fan of pretty much every game Bioware has put out, and I expect that they will continue to release awesome things in the future.

#1147
DarkShadow

DarkShadow
  • Members
  • 371 messages

Njald wrote...

What clarification do Bioware think they can offer us?
"This ending is poorly written and disconnected from playing the game"
Gee, thanks. We couldn't figure that one out by ourselves.
We did not get to play thru an ending. One was thrust upon us.
No amount of exposition will change that. The only thing that actually changes that is an ending we can PLAY thru. We want OUR Shepard there, making the choices OUR Shepard will make, with consequences OUR Shepard have to face.

This is the core of it and Bioware Have to know this by now or they are insanely deluded.


This. And this essentially means goodbye Bioware for me.

#1148
Valo_Soren

Valo_Soren
  • Members
  • 769 messages
They also, however, said on twitter they weren't changing the ending just adding clarity and closure, so that's two sources saying the same thing and you people are still thinking you'll get what you want? It is time to quit and enjoy the game for what it is.

#1149
Darkmood76

Darkmood76
  • Members
  • 5 messages

Doom Lich wrote...

Congratulations Bioware/EA. If this turns out to be true you can be damn sure I won't buy any other Mass Effect titles you release in the future. I certainly won't want to invest any more in this universe if you leave it as is.

And you can be damn sure they'll make more titles in set in the mass effect universe.


My feelings as well, infact I may just save my time and money in the future and just avoid all future Bioware/EA games

#1150
DoctorCrowtgamer

DoctorCrowtgamer
  • Members
  • 1 875 messages
Well they just lost all my money for all time.  They lied and didn't fix it so I am 100% done with both EA and Bioware.  If I had enough money for a lawer I would sue EA for my $80 back.  I am now done with both companies and I am going to remove all of their products from my computer and the next time I have a cook out I will burn them.