Aller au contenu

Photo

I don't get the hysteria over the relays blowing up


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
423 réponses à ce sujet

#276
Funkdrspot

Funkdrspot
  • Members
  • 1 104 messages

SaltyWaffles-PD wrote...

Warden130 wrote...

The Crucible destroying a Mass relay is differant than slamming an asteroid into one (which was the Alpha Relay as well). Just think people! Don't yell plot hole at every little thing cause the endings were bad.


Except this is never hinted at, foreshadowed, explained in any way whatsoever, and is never necessary.

Not everything needs to be hinted or foreshadowed.

Lol at "its never necessary". It just shows the real reason why people are so up-in-arms is that they can't let go of this fictional galaxy. They can't accept change.

SaltyWaffles-PD wrote...When the ending of a trilogy casually contradicts and violates explicit canon/lore info (that was the major focus of one of the most plot-relevant missions in the SERIES) in a completely unecessary way without any explanation or necessity whatsoever, it's BAD WRITING.


1. it doesn't 'casually contradict' anything. It takes plans for a massive space ship handed down from countless cycles being built by the greatest minds in the galaxy for the energy to be converted to whatever radiation it is. I don't think there's anything casual about it.

2. It doesn't violate anything. We have 1 example of what happens when the raw energy of a relay is released. How you can conceive that as 100% set in stone that the relay's energy can't rearranged or converted and that the relays ALWAYS have to blow up that exact same way is beyond me.

#277
Funkdrspot

Funkdrspot
  • Members
  • 1 104 messages

moater boat wrote...


You do realize that the only reason Europe was able to recover after WW2 was because of absurd amounts of aid from untouched parts of the world like the U.S.

In ME3 EVERYONE was devastated.

You're arguing semantics and completely missing the point.

moater boat wrote...And yes, loss of infrastructure DOES kill people. If you can't get to the hospital when you need to, you die. Even if you can get there, if they can't get supplies because bridges and factories are destroyed, you still die. The arguments you are making have no historical precidence. Quite the opposite in fact.


Again with arguing pointless semantics. A temporary loss of infrastructure is not going to kill everyone, which was my point from the beginning.

#278
Myrmedus

Myrmedus
  • Members
  • 1 760 messages
The sheer fact, OP, you've had to go into such detail over explaining why the Relays being destroyed may or may not cause supernovae is the precise reason for the uproar.

If the ending depicted the simple dismantling of the Relays appropriately and adequately it wouldn't require this kind of analysis just to simply understand the message - there's a difference between analysis being possible because a message has depth and analysis being required just in order to understand what's going on: the former is depth and the latter is poor imagery.

#279
Funkdrspot

Funkdrspot
  • Members
  • 1 104 messages
[quote]Tregon wrote...

Are you going to build it from corpses? You are handwaving away need for resources, tools and so forth.
And feeling those hundreds of millions with whatever is left on ravaged planet.[/quote]

What an assinine argument. When it's sink or swim, people usually choose to swim. If they need tools they MAKE them. If they need resources they FIND them. If food is scarce they ration it until they can get more.

Will some people die? Sure, but you have no logical argument for how everyone on and around earth is going to starve/die off.


[quote]Tregon wrote...Society is dependent on easy, fast and cheap interstellar travel.
Again, technology is not magic. It requires knowledge, resources and tools.[/quote]

Society is but LIFE is not.

And you don't lose your knowledge and tools simply because the relays are gone.


[quote]Tregon wrote...
And you are still not thinking the issue properly. Loss of infrastruture kills people. We depend on infrastruture to provide food, sanitation, healthcare. Loss of those results in massive level deaths because population is not able to suddenly change into subsistence farming.[/quote]

Once again you're arguing semantics.

My point has always been that this won't kill everyone off and you can point at WW2 as proof of that. People scraped by but they survived.

[quote]Tregon wrote...Those areas which might be less affected by loss of infrastruture do not have any technology!
Do you think Somalia could rebuild this planet if first world countries vanished tomorrow?[/quote]

O lord stop with the horrible analogies. What you're suggesting isn't even remotely similar.

[quote]Tregon wrote...First world problems are relevant, as loss of first world collapses the whole house of cards. Because that is where your vaunted "technology" resides.[/quote]
'First world problems' are relevant to the basic survival of a species? LoL

[quote]Tregon wrote...Europe rebuilt with support from USA and rest of planet which still had their technology. Look at North Korea for example of hoe "there is tech, so all is well" works.[/quote]

I'm sorry but how did earth suddenly lose all their tech? They didn't.
Did they lose all the knowledge they gained? No.

Please stop with your bad comparisons! Somalia? N Korea? Learn about variables before you compare situations.

[quote]Tregon wrote...They HAVE theoretical knowledge. But they cannot put it into practice because they lack resources, industry or both.[/quote]

You have no idea what you're talking about. What you're trying to allude to is not a surival issue and is largely dominated by politics. Again, please stop with your bad comparisons.



[quote]
Your hypothetical situation isn't remotely close to what happened.

It's not even apples and oranges, it's more like apples and anvils.
[/quote]

Really? All centers of population were totally torn up by reapers. Where do you think all industry is? Exactly! Near population centers for workfroce. Thus industrial capacity has been shot to hell. Further made worse by fact that ME society depends on importing goods from other planets.

No more resources, no more industry. No more society. Tech level stagnates fast and hard, just like in my hypothetical situation.

[/quote]

#280
derpy202

derpy202
  • Members
  • 70 messages
Without Mass Relays there is no galactic community, everyones back in the "stone age" so to speak. You can't get from cluster to cluster anymore. It's just completely ruined the mass effect 'universe'. Thats why everyone hates it.

#281
Beti88

Beti88
  • Members
  • 154 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...

A temporary loss of infrastructure is not going to kill everyone, which was my point from the beginning.


Since when is:

completely devastated Earth, a decimated Humanity = temporary loss of infrastructure?

#282
CrazyCatDude

CrazyCatDude
  • Members
  • 899 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...

When i hear people talk bad about the ending, i don't quite understand how the relays blowing up factors into the plot holes or the whole 'everyones gonna die/back to midevil times' ideas.

Did i miss something or are people in Mass Effect times somehow completely helpless and totally unable to hunt/farm? It sounds like a FTL-extension of '1st world problems'. I just don't get the idea of complaining about transportation difficulties when the alternative is galaxy wide genocide.

It's not like earth is overpopulated at the moment. Plenty of beach front property in London and Canada, that's for sure.

As far as the plot hole about the relays not asploding entire solar systems, I always assumed that because the radius of the endgame blast were covering each star cluster ( cluster>>>>>system ), that the energy wasn't as concentrated.


*****   edit *****
Ok i'm getting tired of being asked the same questions so I'll try to lay out my theories for all of it.

- Starvation issue. The Reapers target large cities, not rural areas. The
whole 'OMG Quarians and Turians will starve' thing has already been
shown to be overblown as D-proteins occur naturally and can be
synthesized NOW so you KNOW they can be made with better tech. Will some people have it tough? Sure, but they'll survive which is the point.

- Relays blowing up. The
idea that the relays blow up the solar system has already been
addressed and is refuted by the different destroy endings. Obviously the
crucible CAN fry planets (BAD destroy ending) but if you built it well enough it doesn't(every other ending). Simply put, there's a difference between releasing RAW energy ( slamming an asteroid into Alpha ) and the 
crucible converting the relays energy into a form of radiation. Basic chem teaches that the larger the radius you have to energize, the more diffuse the
energy is going to be.

Whatever the crucible releases is some form of
radiation that bathes the entire star cluster the relay is in which is
1000x of times larger in radius than blowing up a single solar system. It's converting that raw energy from the relay and turning it into a controlled burst not unlike a radio station tower.

- Citadel falling to earth. Lastly
the whole, nuclear winter from the citadel falling back to earth is
wrong too b/c the citadel has little to no kinetic energy behind it. We
fear extinction level events from asteroids because they travel 25km/s
or 90,000km/h. It's the kinetic energy behind the asteroid that makes it
the threat, not the asteroid itself.


Dude, to borrow one of my niece's favorite phrases, you don't understand how *things* work.

First, as to the Turians and the Quarians starving to death, a lot of that will depend on whether or not the live ships survived intact, how many Quarians remained on Rannoch, and how many Turians survived the battle.  It's *possible* that, assuming you did *not* pick the destroy ending, the Turians and Quarians survive using the resources of the Quarian Migrant fleet.  Ironically, in this case, the Turians and Quarians may be more likely to survive.  If you did pick the destroy ending...  well, we'll get back to that.

As to everyone else starving...  Yeah.  That pretty much happens.  Here's why.  All the infrastructure has been destroyed, and a lot of the people who know how to farm are dead, and those who are alive probably don't have the specialized equipment they need.  Farming is not as simple as "hurp, throw some seeds on the ground, durp."  Farming is a highly skilled profession.  You have to know what to plant, when to plant, where to plant, how to rotate crops, how to harvest, how to use a lot of dangerous, specialized equipment without getting killed.  You can not feed billions of people without industrial scale agriculture.  PERIOD.  Even if the Reapers had been destroyed and the Mass Relays left intact, you were looking at *massive* food shortages on a galactic scale, just because of the damage done.

Second, with explosions, there is one simple rule you can follow.  The bigger the total volume affected by the explosion, the stronger the explosion was at the flashpoint.  If you have an explosion that spreads out over 25 or so light years (which is the estimated range at which a type 1A Super Nova would sterilize all worlds of life) and an explosion that spreads out over 50 light years, that means that conditions were *worse* at the point of detonation in the 50 light year explosion, because it took more energy to push the shock wave out that far.

Third, raditation *is* energy.

Forth, Let's assume the Citadel is parked right on the edge of what would be considered "space".  80 km up.  This means it would hit with the force of 1.5 Gigatons.  Not that bad, really.  That's only a hundred thousand times the size of the Hiroshima blast.  Except, it doesn't come down in one spot, it comes down in at least five different spots, so, while the impacts aren't as big individually, they actually end up doing more damage because they are spread out.  Then there's all the Ezo and other toxins on the station.

And then, there's the destroy option.  Oh, the destroy option.  The option which "will destroy all synthetic life, including the Geth, and most of the technology you use."

So, leaving aside the genocide of the Geth, you just effectively destroyed every ship in the fleet.  You can not glide a Kodiak shuttle down from orbit on a ballistic re-entry.  It has to have it's computers and Mass Effect core intact, but it doesn't, because the crucible just destroyed it.  So, no one on the fleet has any way to get back to Earth from those floating tombs that used to be a fleet.  Congratulations, everyone on the fleet is now doomed to die.  EVERYONE.  Most likely within hours, as they use up the air which is no longer being recycled.  The Quarians will go first, having only the small amount of air in their suits.  If they crack their suits to get at the air in the ships, they might last a little longer, but then they'd die of infection.

Oh, and all those suddenly powerless ships and Reapers fighting around the Citadel.  More falling projectiles that make a very big, very toxic boom when they hit the ground.

What ever ending you chose, nice job breaking it, Hero.

#283
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...

The idea that the relays blow up the solar system has already been addressed and is refuted by the different destroy endings. Obviously the crucible CAN fry planets but if you built it well enough it doesn't. How you guys can't wrap your heads around the whole fact that the crucible using the relays energy is different than slamming an asteroid into a relay is beyond me. And anyone that has taken basic chem knows that the larger the radius you have to energize, the more diffuse the energy is going to be. Whatever the crucible releases is some form of radiation that bathes the entire star cluster the relay is in which is 1000x of times larger in radius than blowing up a single solar system.


Actually, I don't think you've explained anything at all here. You can't assume that the energy in the Mass Rely will instantaneously be diffused over a huge area. Like any explosion it will begin in a tight highly enegized ball and then expand over a larger and larger area, while at the same time diffusing in intensity. The game lore says this will happen with roughly the force of an exploding Supernova, which will fry the whole star system. Now eventually the energy of the blast will be spread out over such a large area that the effect that you describe will occur, but not until after the same energy have been expanding from a much more compact and destructive force. Your argumant is like saying it's harmless to hold an exploding stick of dynamite, because eventually the energy of the explosion will be diffused over such a wide area it's no longer harmful.

#284
Funkdrspot

Funkdrspot
  • Members
  • 1 104 messages

Myrmedus wrote...

The sheer fact, OP, you've had to go into such detail over explaining why the Relays being destroyed may or may not cause supernovae is the precise reason for the uproar.

If the ending depicted the simple dismantling of the Relays appropriately and adequately it wouldn't require this kind of analysis just to simply understand the message - there's a difference between analysis being possible because a message has depth and analysis being required just in order to understand what's going on: the former is depth and the latter is poor imagery.


Sorry but i don't buy that. I think people just decided to shut off their minds when they started seeing an ending they didn't like. When people get in a negative mindset then they stop trying to connect the dots which is exactly what we see here.

I don't like the ending either but it's plain as day in the end cut scene as far as the relays are concerned.

#285
MageCeridan

MageCeridan
  • Members
  • 131 messages
The mass relay appears to be "used up" after it fires the beam and energy wave, tus it's destruction causes no damage.

That's the only part that I am not really pissed off about(there is no plot hole in the Mass Relay Explosion in this case). Not to say that there's alot of plot holes in the events prior to the cutscene.

StarChild : Mega plothole
Too many to count in his dialog alone, but his existance also undermind ME1/ME2/Arrival/rest of ME3.
Anderson vs TIM: even more plotholes
Cylindrical object appearing after the TIM/Anderson encounter (if Anderson is alive)
Hackett asking for Shepard on Shepard's probably destroyed coms.
Shepard having Anderson's wound.
Anderson appearing in the control room (no other path can be found really, I don't buy the shifting walls)
Unlimited clip (could actually be simply a "Cutscene power to the max" effect... without the cutscene.

Harby's beam pushing Shepard closer to the beam.
While that might be simply oversight, it's still strange.

Joker's escape
     while unplausable, it might be possible.
     Members of your team appears on the Normandy after crash is however impossible unless EDI suddently invented Star Treck Teleportation.

[EDIT] Added joker's escape

Modifié par MageCeridan, 04 avril 2012 - 12:48 .


#286
Kartre

Kartre
  • Members
  • 36 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...
Not everything needs to be hinted or foreshadowed.


Agreed. What's troubling in this particular is that Shepard, whose only experience with mass relay destruction is of the "supernova" variety, takes his three choices without question about that consequence. It doesn't fit the character (or normal human behavior I would think) to unquestioningly commit an action that would, for all one knows, result in galacticide. The only "good" choice without that knowledge is to let the Crucible be destroyed. Better the cycle continue than destroy every living thing in every relay-occupied star system, right?

#287
Tregon

Tregon
  • Members
  • 132 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...
What an assinine argument. When it's sink or swim, people usually choose to swim. If they need tools they MAKE them. If they need resources they FIND them. If food is scarce they ration it until they can get more.


Oh? 
Then tell me exactly how you will make a wrench.
Tell me where you find resource which does not exist in vicinity, or which you cannot access?
And what part of massive amount of death caused by starvation in known history makes you unable to grasp that "ration until they can get more" IS NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO WORK!

Will some people die? Sure, but you have no logical argument for how everyone on and around earth is going to starve/die off.


We have logical argument for about 80-90% of people starving, dying of disease, injury or exposure.
At that point, they hardly have population or infrastructure to maintain interplanetary level tech. Even less one extending to other solar systems.


Society is but LIFE is not.

And you don't lose your knowledge and tools simply because the relays are gone.


Knowledge is lost when person knowing dies. 80-90% mortality rate means huge amount of information is lost.
Also, in modern society nobody can alone hold all the keys for manufacturing of anything complex. That means you need ALL people with knowledge related to it to survive or you are screwed.

Tools means industry as well. And industry was just ruined by massive warfare.


Once again you're arguing semantics.

My point has always been that this won't kill everyone off and you can point at WW2 as proof of that. People scraped by but they survived.


And how would they have survived if aid did not pour out from elsewhere? Could they have maintained their previous level of technology when infrastructure needed to maintain it was shot to hell?

Answer is.. NO! 
Germany after WW2 was so shot up that without huge amount of supplies being thrown in, their population would have starved to death to point where Germany as state would not have anymore existed.

O lord stop with the horrible analogies. What you're suggesting isn't even remotely similar.


It is perfectly similar. If you complain that issues are only "first world ones" then you mean that first world collapses but 3rd remains.

Problem is, 3rd words is down the ladders in everything related to technology. If 1st world cannot maintain itself, then whole planet is collapsed to level of 3rd world.

'First world problems' are relevant to the basic survival of a species? LoL


Species might survive, but it will be technologically somewhere in middle ages. Do you think they can scrape their way up from there when all the easily tapped resources used originally are gone?

I'm sorry but how did earth suddenly lose all their tech? They didn't.
Did they lose all the knowledge they gained? No.

Where is knowledge going to be stored? Infrastructure is shot to hell, means computers as well. Those facilities are also near population centers ravaged. People die.

Knowledge is lost on massive scale.

Please stop with your bad comparisons! Somalia? N Korea? Learn about variables before you compare situations.


Learn about dependencies.

You have no idea what you're talking about. What you're trying to allude to is not a surival issue and is largely dominated by politics. Again, please stop with your bad comparisons.


Survival where humanity is doomed into perpetual middle ages. Oh glory!



Really? All centers of population were totally torn up by reapers. Where do you think all industry is? Exactly! Near population centers for workfroce. Thus industrial capacity has been shot to hell. Further made worse by fact that ME society depends on importing goods from other planets.

No more resources, no more industry. No more society. Tech level stagnates fast and hard, just like in my hypothetical situation.


This is still true. Tech is gone. So is industry. Welcome to middle ages. How you like your plague?

#288
Vhalkyrie

Vhalkyrie
  • Members
  • 1 917 messages
If the mass relay discharges the energy and sends it to the next one, who then discharges and sends to the next one, what happens with the last relay in the chain?

Here's the problem with the argument that the mass relay is only harmful in the destroy scenario or low EMS.  Joker is running in all scenarios.  The Normandy is shown breaking apart in all scenarios.  Normandy crash lands in all scenarios.  Is mass relays blowing up only harmful to the Normandy then?

Modifié par Vhalkyrie, 04 avril 2012 - 12:37 .


#289
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests
What's up with people with so much negativity?

You have a fleet you can scrap to make new buildings and Liveship/Research vessel if you saved the Quarian. Plus, who cares BioWare would not let them die anyway so why fight againts the fact BioWare don't give a **** ? :whistle:


Vhalkyrie wrote...

If the mass relay discharges the energy and sends it to the next one, who then discharges and sends to the next one, what happens with the last relay in the chain?


I'll call the OMEGA-4 relay.

Modifié par Imperium Alpha, 04 avril 2012 - 12:37 .


#290
Sinekein

Sinekein
  • Members
  • 1 135 messages

Funkdrspot wrote...

- Starvation issue. The Reapers target large cities, not rural areas. The
whole 'OMG Quarians and Turians will starve' thing has already been
shown to be overblown as D-proteins occur naturally and can be
synthesized NOW so you KNOW they can be made with better tech. Will some people have it tough? Sure, but they'll survive which is the point.


It's hard to know how much individuals are living aboard all the ships during the final battle. Still, when you see how thousands of refugees are hard to feed these days (take any war in the world - Syria, Somalia...), millions of them of different alien races ? A nightmare.

Especially since the biggest cities on Earth are in ruins. And that with the end of the reaper threat, petty grudges will quickly come back.

Only the hanar will be happy, since they seem to be able to live in water. I just hope they don't have any salt issues.

#291
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 188 messages
The destruction of the relays is bad because it plunges the galaxy into a dark age, thus destroying the ME universe as a fictional setting and removing the foundation on which our imagination rests, the root of our headcanons. We must first rebuild the world in order to imagine a future. That's what gets people riled up about it. It's an attempt to get into our brains and destroy what is there.

However, the local scenarios need not be as bad, as I've outlined here.

Try to put a positive spin on things, people. The ending is bad enough without everyone using the bleakest possible interpretation.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 04 avril 2012 - 12:44 .


#292
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests

Sinekein wrote...

Funkdrspot wrote...
(...)

It's hard to know how much individuals are living aboard all the ships during the final battle. Still, when you see how thousands of refugees are hard to feed these days (take any war in the world - Syria, Somalia...), millions of them of different alien races ? A nightmare.

Especially since the biggest cities on Earth are in ruins. And that with the end of the reaper threat, petty grudges will quickly come back.

Only the hanar will be happy, since they seem to be able to live in water. I just hope they don't have any salt issues.


You cannot compare. If we seem to have problem with food for regugee and other issue you mention is because country leader and officials DO NOT CARE. Why help people that doesn't bring anything to their country? If Syria or Somalia had something to offer you would have seen thousand of troops ship accros the globe to fight or create food supply.

#293
BobbyDylan

BobbyDylan
  • Members
  • 683 messages
I find it amazing the people seem to think that the relay explosions wouldn't be super-nova.

There are 2 ingame referances to what happends when a relay is destroyed, and neither say "it'll pass the energy along and evenutally evaporate...".
The game tells us that destroying relays is a bad idea, then forces us to destroy the relays. If you want to assume otherwise, go ahead, I'll continue to beleive what's happening ingame, though.

#294
Sinekein

Sinekein
  • Members
  • 1 135 messages

Imperium Alpha wrote...

Sinekein wrote...

Funkdrspot wrote...
(...)

It's hard to know how much individuals are living aboard all the ships during the final battle. Still, when you see how thousands of refugees are hard to feed these days (take any war in the world - Syria, Somalia...), millions of them of different alien races ? A nightmare.

Especially since the biggest cities on Earth are in ruins. And that with the end of the reaper threat, petty grudges will quickly come back.

Only the hanar will be happy, since they seem to be able to live in water. I just hope they don't have any salt issues.


You cannot compare. If we seem to have problem with food for regugee and other issue you mention is because country leader and officials DO NOT CARE. Why help people that doesn't bring anything to their country? If Syria or Somalia had something to offer you would have seen thousand of troops ship accros the globe to fight or create food supply.


Yes, and for what reason would all the races stay united ? The Reapers are gone, everyone's priority will be to go back home as quickly as possible, even if it means not helping the neighbour.

Without an enemy, it's hard to keep alliances together. What will the krogan do on earth ? Be farmers ? Tech experts ? They need to fight.

And the human alliance doesn't mean that everyone on earth will be happy to have to move because aliens need a home.

#295
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests

BobbyDylan wrote...
I find it amazing the people seem to think that the relay explosions wouldn't be super-nova.

There are 2 ingame referances to what happends when a relay is destroyed, and neither say "it'll pass the energy along and evenutally evaporate...".
The game tells us that destroying relays is a bad idea, then forces us to destroy the relays. If you want to assume otherwise, go ahead, I'll continue to beleive what's happening ingame, though.


Huu... In game reference also told about gun ammunition adopt in 2 year and Citadel / Relay being build by Prothean... What you dont, understand is that BioWare can do anything with their canon/story and in this case they do not need to change any lore as Mass Relay transfer the energy and then shutdown and collapse. Not like species did extensive research on what happen to Mass Relay if x/y happen.

#296
Vhalkyrie

Vhalkyrie
  • Members
  • 1 917 messages

Imperium Alpha wrote...

Vhalkyrie wrote...

If the mass relay discharges the energy and sends it to the next one, who then discharges and sends to the next one, what happens with the last relay in the chain?


I'll call the OMEGA-4 relay.


Hm.  I can see that, actually.

Modifié par Vhalkyrie, 04 avril 2012 - 12:58 .


#297
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests

Sinekein wrote...

Imperium Alpha wrote...

Sinekein wrote...

Funkdrspot wrote...
(...)

(...)

(...)


Yes, and for what reason would all the races stay united ? The Reapers are gone, everyone's priority will be to go back home as quickly as possible, even if it means not helping the neighbour.

Without an enemy, it's hard to keep alliances together. What will the krogan do on earth ? Be farmers ? Tech experts ? They need to fight.

And the human alliance doesn't mean that everyone on earth will be happy to have to move because aliens need a home.


Because BioWare say so?... If BioWare want every species to bound together and reconstruct Earth together to survive thats their right to do so. Else they will make them go away from Earth and one way or another everyone will have survive. As if everyone die it wouldn't allow them to make Mass Effect 4 <_<

Modifié par Imperium Alpha, 04 avril 2012 - 12:58 .


#298
Sinekein

Sinekein
  • Members
  • 1 135 messages

Imperium Alpha wrote...

Because BioWare say so?... If BioWare want every species to bound together and reconstruct Earth together to surive thats their right to do so. Else they will make them go away from Earth and one way or another everyone will have survive. As if everyone die it wouldn't allow them to make Mass Effect 4 <_<


"Because Bioware say so" worked from the beginning, because what happened was logical. Even the smallest details made sense.

People seemed to praise BW for the dark endings of ME3. The union of everyone to rebuild everything from scratch, on Earth, it tastes like diabetes. It's MLP, not Mass Effect.

Modifié par Sinekein, 04 avril 2012 - 01:00 .


#299
Vhalkyrie

Vhalkyrie
  • Members
  • 1 917 messages

Imperium Alpha wrote...

Huu... In game reference also told about gun ammunition adopt in 2 year and Citadel / Relay being build by Prothean... What you dont, understand is that BioWare can do anything with their canon/story and in this case they do not need to change any lore as Mass Relay transfer the energy and then shutdown and collapse. Not like species did extensive research on what happen to Mass Relay if x/y happen.


Sure, the writers can make any change they wanted.  If they wanted flying unicorns, then it could happen.  However, from the popup ad at the end, they still want to sell DLCs.  If people don't like the story, they don't have to buy whatever they sell, either.

#300
Guest_PresidentCowboy_*

Guest_PresidentCowboy_*
  • Guests

BobbyDylan wrote...

I find it amazing the people seem to think that the relay explosions wouldn't be super-nova.

There are 2 ingame referances to what happends when a relay is destroyed, and neither say "it'll pass the energy along and evenutally evaporate...".
The game tells us that destroying relays is a bad idea, then forces us to destroy the relays. If you want to assume otherwise, go ahead, I'll continue to beleive what's happening ingame, though.


Yeah. Bioware haven't said anything about Mass Relays having multiple ways of exploding(?) so we have to go by what we know.