blacqout wrote...
Relwyn wrote...
blacqout wrote...
Nope. You didn't argue my point at all. You presented a new one that is easily knocked down. That is a straw man.
I did not state, or imply, that having an education does not give you an advantage.blacqout wrote...
Do you really think that having a degree makes you some sort of arbiter of quality story telling? Obviously not, which is why you then defer to a professor's judgement... which is lame, even as far as appeals to authority go.
Would you care to revise your statement?
Do you not know what the word arbiter means?
Actually I do, and I assume you want to go somewhere with this? Because your point escapes me.
arbiter [ˈɑːbɪtə]
1. (Law) a person empowered to judge in a dispute; referee; arbitrator
2. a person having complete control of something
[from Latin, of obscure origin]
Modifié par Relwyn, 03 avril 2012 - 04:28 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






