189 réponses à ce sujet

[YeKnight94]

*facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk* *facedesk*

[Wise Men]

WtbJamesVega wrote...

We don't want the ending to be changed. We want the indoctrination theory to be truu.

I find this post interesting.  The beauty of the ending is that it calls for imagination and speculation.  I almost don't want them to "confirm" if it is "true or not".

Just let me draw my own conclusions.  At the same time, I acknowledge that some gamers prefer to have it all laid out.  And that's cool too.  So, maybe the DLC will do this for them. 

[eternalnightmare13]

Taritu wrote...

here

@kanjilikesboys We're so glad you liked it. Don't worry, your ending won't be changed. We're just releasing more content.

Well...DUUUUUUUUUUH. They can't ''change'' the ending with a DLC. 'Maybe' and I emphasis 'MAYBE' they'll release something like Broken Steel for Fallout 3 which Bethesda did which allowed continued play after completeing the main quest and some follow up to the main storyline/resolution. But you still had to go through the original ending, I believe.  Maybe we'll learn the fact of the galaxy and our butt buddies, then again maybe not.  I give BW kudos for sticking to their guns and not pandering to a minority of whiners.

[Tigerman123]

Booyah!

[What a Succulent Ass]

IGN wasn't the source this time. They simply reported it from PRIMA.

[arial]

bluewolv1970 wrote...

arial wrote...

xxskyshadowxx wrote...

By releasing more content...I hope they mean that they will be releasing the other 13 endings. ;D

they NEVER said there would by 16 endings, its a rumor some fan started and people started believeing this rumor because its what they wanted. 

the rumor that was started by the prima OFFICIAL GAME GUIDE

PRIMA has nothing to do with BW, they are completely diff companies, Prima's guides have a hsitory of listing features that are not in the finished product

[Steel Dancer]

...your ending won't be changed, not the ending won't be changed.

That's rather odd phrasing.

[charmingcharlie]

Obviously Bioware has completed the "we are listening" phase and now entered the "ignoring all the feedback" phase.

[Squadrito]

I hope someone throws food at the Bioware officials at PAX.

[digby69]

by not changing the ending they have pandered to a minority of whiners

[Dude_in_the_Room]

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

But it's not ok to release plot hole fixing DLC and charge for it.

[SynheKatze]

charmingcharlie wrote...

Obviously Bioware has completed the "we are listening" phase and now entered the "ignoring all the feedback" phase.

Did they ever moved from the later?

[shepskisaac]

How is that news? We've known since 2 weeks:

blog.bioware.com/2012/03/21/4108/

Ray Muzyka wrote...

[...] Exec Producer Casey Hudson and the team are hard at work on a number of game content initiatives that will help answer the questions, providing more clarity for those seeking further closure to their journey.

[eternalnightmare13]

SamT3N7 wrote...

I think they are hinting at an alternate ending. That, or it's a clarification. Either way I'm happy.

Did you read it? How'd you draw that conclusion from it?! They release mission based dlc you can play prior or post ending. That's all.

[Vanguard Of Destruction]

Squadrito wrote...

I hope someone throws food at the Bioware officials at PAX.

LOL

[What a Succulent Ass]

Steel Dancer wrote...

...your ending won't be changed, not the ending won't be changed.

That's rather odd phrasing.

It is an odd phrasing, which I take to mean they will at best release additional content.

The problem is that that means the Starchild is here to stay. And there's just nothing salvageable about that thing.

Modifié par Random Jerkface, 03 avril 2012 - 09:43 .

[What a Succulent Ass]

Squadrito wrote...

I hope someone throws food at the Bioware officials at PAX.

Because assault will definitely get you what you want.

[Traim Eisenblut]

No watter how you look at BioWares position, there is no solution for them to get out of the mess unscratched. Which is good, because they brought this upon theirself in the first place.

I would like a completly new ending that erases everything after "entering the lightbeam" and replaces it with something that stays coherent to the narrative of ME: 1+2+99% of 3, follows a logical pattern with limitations given by the established lore of the fiction (no godlike species-melding, "new kind of DNA" nonsensical crap) and delivers some closure to the stories of all of Shepards friends.

But..."additional content" in form of a PURPLE explosion would be fine too, I guess =/

No, I srsly doubt that the people in charge who messed up the ending are wise enough to admit their failure by eradicating it and deliver something substantially different. Maybe out of pride, maybe they fear that would lead to just another outrage, maybe because they like their ending and want to keep their "artistic integrity". Either way: if what they do leaves me as dissatisfied with the game as I am now: no more money for you, BioWare. You have plenty of competition I`d like to support.

[SynheKatze]

Random Jerkface wrote...

Steel Dancer wrote...

...your ending won't be changed, not the ending won't be changed.

That's rather odd phrasing.

It is an odd phrasing, which I take to mean they will at best release additional content.

The problem is that that means the Starchild is here to stay. And there's just nothing salvageable about that thing.

Maybe we'll be allowed to shoot the damn thing in the head this time. A man can dream.

Or kill it with fire and watch its agony...

[Dude_in_the_Room]

What if enough ppl called EA support and said that Origin wouldn't take their credit card numbers.  When the support rep asks for the number, give it to them, but replace the last 4 digits with letters....and then say, it doesn't make sense but thats the way I want it.

[hotdogbsg]

"Your ending"

Maybe nothing or maybe hinting at an alternative ending.

Unlikely though.