189 réponses à ce sujet

[kbct]

Don't do it BioWare! Don't let this epic epic story end with colors.

[Getorex]

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

Very well said.

There are no blanks, just gaping sores.  Sorry, you may NOT build synthetics to kill organics so they wont be killed by their own synthetics.  NO NO NO!  Bad idiot.  BAD.  You may NOT directly and clearly contradict the very game you are ending either: Synthetics always turn on their creators.  NO NO NO.  The CREATORS turned on their synthetics (Quarians attacked Geth first, NOT other way around) AND the only Geth that were attacking organics were under the sway and control of the Reapers!  Then there's the Geth:Quarian peace...oh, yeah, THAT is all turny on creators right there.  Then there's EDI who is clearly just BUSTING to...undo Joker's pants and get it on with him.  

Total retardation.  You do NOT introduce a retarded child and declare him a god in the very last act of the story, wave a magic wand, and turn everything that happened before into retard juice.  NO.  NO.  Bad developer!  BAD!

You do NOT get to teleport people off the earth via magic and stick them on the Normandy that is unaccountably running away from the fight, specifically abandoning Shepard, so they can get it on in a big orgy on Jurassic Planet.  NO.  NO NO NO.  Bad bad BAD writer!  BAD.

[DigitalAvatar]

The Grey Nayr wrote...

SimonM72 wrote...

Those going to PAX, call them out on it!. So far they haven't even had the good grace to aknowledge that promises were broken.

Don't you guys dare cause problems at PAX. It's a video game convention, not a place to harass developers with your petty crap.

If you try, I hope security throws you out on your asses!

I think it's perfectly reasonable to bring up the issue at a video game convention. Unfortunately I don't think the executive team responsible for the game are going to be there, so they can't be directly asked to explain their misleading comments.

[Getorex]

DigitalAvatar wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

SimonM72 wrote...

Those going to PAX, call them out on it!. So far they haven't even had the good grace to aknowledge that promises were broken.

Don't you guys dare cause problems at PAX. It's a video game convention, not a place to harass developers with your petty crap.

If you try, I hope security throws you out on your asses!

I think it's perfectly reasonable to bring up the issue at a video game convention. Unfortunately I don't think the executive team responsible for the game are going to be there, so they can't be directly asked to explain their misleading comments.

I believe that those going to PAX should take a roll of toilet paper with them specifically for Bioware.  When asked what the roll is for you declare to the press and Bioware that it is a requirement to wipe the sh*t that is the ending of ME3 off your game monitor/TV AND out of your eyes.  <_<

[MsKlaussen]

Legion64 wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

This. The ending just needs to fill in of some plot holes and we will all be good.

It needs to do more than that if the claims of "player choices matter" are ever to be believed from them again.

Simply put - some may claim they stuck with ME because they wanted to see how well Shepard could die. To them I say whatever helps them feel closer to Trollface. To those who can be honest enough to admit that they started this with the goal of Shepard finishing on his or her own two feet and under control of his or her own brain, to find out later that this was a deliberate and intentional impossibility regardless of what they chose is an dance in the moonlight of the pathetic.

There are people too busy throwing their backs out trying to remain within the mighty grip of conformity to entertain the truth of that, who would rather refer to people who prefer not to pay to waste time chasing rainbows as "whiners", but that changes nothing about the merits or existence of said truth.

[Plasma Prestige]

Shelled wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

Very well said.

No offensive, but no thanks. The green and blue endings don't make sense no matter how much explaining they do.

Except they do if it was all a dream.

[I_Jedi]

Link doesn't work.

Is it gone?

[Getorex]

Plasma Prestige wrote...

Shelled wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

Very well said.

No offensive, but no thanks. The green and blue endings don't make sense no matter how much explaining they do.

Except they do if it was all a dream.

You are clearly deeply (DEEPLY) in the hope camp that Bioware will adopt the post hoc "Indoctrination Theory" and make it their own to save the day.  They COULD do this, and it could fix the ending, but it was not their intention to begin with.  What we got, as is, WAS THEIR INTENTION.  It was NOT a trick.  Not a game.  Not a prank.  It was the sh*t.  They can now save their butts by either totally redoing the ending OR adopting the totally post hoc IT thing.  It still requires they FIX THE END.  No ifs, ands, or buts.

[eboshi12]

kbct wrote...

Don't do it BioWare! Don't let this epic epic story end with colors.

Lol, THIS!

[xMellowhype]

thedosbox wrote...

Mr. MannlyMan wrote...

Why would they change it? Bioware's all about pandering to minorities lately.

If you mean RPG nerds who still live in their mothers basements? Maybe.

Doesn't make them less human. 

[Rabid Rooster]

Shelled wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

Very well said.

No offensive, but no thanks. The green and blue endings don't make sense no matter how much explaining they do.

Agreed. But dont forget the Red.

[aberdash]

Bioware most likely plans on prescreening any questions if they do a Q&A so we wont get much from them at PAX anyways.

Modifié par aberdash, 04 avril 2012 - 01:38 .

[Getorex]

aberdash wrote...

Bioware most likely plans on prescreening any questions if they do a Q&A so we wont get much from them at PAX anyways.

That is the alternative.  Totally ignore them so they have bare bones audiences at their sh*t.  Only the idiots from IGN and the like there...no love, no interest, nothing.  Empty seats, no questions, no nothing.

[thedosbox]

xMellowhype wrote...

thedosbox wrote...

Mr. MannlyMan wrote...

Why would they change it? Bioware's all about pandering to minorities lately.

If you mean RPG nerds who still live in their mothers basements? Maybe.

Doesn't make them less human. 

Wait, are you implying real minorities are animals?

Modifié par thedosbox, 04 avril 2012 - 01:43 .

[xMellowhype]

thedosbox wrote...

xMellowhype wrote...

thedosbox wrote...

Mr. MannlyMan wrote...

Why would they change it? Bioware's all about pandering to minorities lately.

If you mean RPG nerds who still live in their mothers basements? Maybe.

Doesn't make them less human. 

Wait, are you implying real minorities are animals?

This is hilariois. Doesn't = Does NOT.

[clipped_wolf]

Rabid Rooster wrote...

Shelled wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

The Grey Nayr wrote...

Ending doesn't need to be changed. Adding on to the ending to fill in the blanks is perfectly acceptable.

Very well said.

No offensive, but no thanks. The green and blue endings don't make sense no matter how much explaining they do.

Agreed. But dont forget the Red.

No.  Red is the easiest to understand.

[thedosbox]

xMellowhype wrote...

thedosbox wrote...

xMellowhype wrote...

thedosbox wrote...

Mr. MannlyMan wrote...

Why would they change it? Bioware's all about pandering to minorities lately.

If you mean RPG nerds who still live in their mothers basements? Maybe.

Doesn't make them less human. 

Wait, are you implying real minorities are animals?

This is hilariois. Doesn't = Does NOT.

Point being, you were the first one to bring up the implications that anyone was less than human, or being treated as any other than human.

And it's spelt "hilarious".

Modifié par thedosbox, 04 avril 2012 - 02:02 .

[DrwEddy]

Tu mortuus ad me, Bioware
In Latin, it means "You're dead to me, BioWare".
You guys should use this phrase more often in case should BioWare fails to their consumers agian.

Modifié par DrwEddy, 04 avril 2012 - 02:30 .

[Mordak55]

Sorry but I was promised multiple and varied ending based on the choices made in the previous games, what I got was the same basic cut scene in 3 colours, that took no account of my previous choices.

Talk about misleading advertising, if you however believe that what we got was what was promised, I have a nice bridge I can sell you.

[Il Divo]

DrwEddy wrote...

Tu mortuus ad me, Bioware
In Latin, it means "You're dead to me, BioWare".

You guys should use this phrase more often in case should BioWare fails to their consumers agian.

Shouldn't it technically read:

"Estis mortui me, Bioware"?

As a collective organization, they would likely be treated as plural. And in this case, we're not showing motion, which ad technically specifices, but rather are emphasizing with respect to whom Bioware is currently dead.  

Modifié par Il Divo, 04 avril 2012 - 02:47 .

[DrwEddy]

Il Divo wrote...

DrwEddy wrote...

Tu mortuus ad me, Bioware
In Latin, it means "You're dead to me, BioWare".

You guys should use this phrase more often in case should BioWare fails to their consumers agian.

Shouldn't it technically read:

"Estis mortui me, Bioware"?

As a collective organization, they would likely be treated as plural. And in this case, we're not showing motion, which ad technically specifices, but rather are emphasizing with respect to whom Bioware is currently dead.  

Excatly my point Il Divo!  Now I will say the phrase agian that you said.
Estis mortui me, BioWare
You're dead to me, BioWare

[Il Divo]

DrwEddy wrote...

Il Divo wrote...

DrwEddy wrote...

Tu mortuus ad me, Bioware
In Latin, it means "You're dead to me, BioWare".

You guys should use this phrase more often in case should BioWare fails to their consumers agian.

Shouldn't it technically read:

"Estis mortui me, Bioware"?

As a collective organization, they would likely be treated as plural. And in this case, we're not showing motion, which ad technically specifices, but rather are emphasizing with respect to whom Bioware is currently dead.  

Excatly my point Il Divo!  Now I will say the phrase agian that you said.
Estis mortui me, BioWare
You're dead to me, BioWare

Now that is a creepy picture. But it does fit the caption nicely.

[AlanC9]

Il Divo wrote...
As a collective organization, they would likely be treated as plural.

I dunno -- what's the Latin rule on this? In US English a corporation is usually singular. The UK typically uses the plural; it's one of the obvious differences.

[Il Divo]

AlanC9 wrote...

Il Divo wrote...
As a collective organization, they would likely be treated as plural.

I dunno -- what's the Latin rule on this? In US English a corporation is usually singular. The UK typically uses the plural; it's one of the obvious differences.

Actually, good point. And thinking about the word for senate (Senatus) is treated as singular, despite describing a collective group of people.

It's been a good four years since I've taken the language (man, that depresses me), so I could be getting forgetful.

Final rewrite:

"Es mortuus me, Bioware".

For simplicity, I'm just going to treat Bioware as an indeclinable noun, unless you have a gender preference you'd like to attach.