608 réponses à ce sujet

[dotupkid]

 No

[twystedspyder]

Nnnope.

[Nassegris]

No…

But I’m reaching the point of not caring. Certainly not shelling out any money for ‘clarification’... ugh.

[clarkusdarkus]

end of the day they want the one thing we have control over, and thats our money, i'll vote with that rather than what they say is a clarification

[Rhz]

http://nooooooooooooooo.com/

Modifié par Rhz, 04 avril 2012 - 03:24 .

[Oakenshield1]

HEEEELLLLL NO! unless of course they add on to the ending and it turns out to be Indoc.

[sandhawk]

I rilly wish that if you were a sapacer in the first and you finde out his mom is a captin in the second i wish they would let you see his mom in the third.

[OrumLeader]

 No

[Pulkvedis]

No! Nein! Niet! Nē!

Lately I've been thinking: What is the point of having DLC's if you can't change the outcome. No matter what I do, I'll still die. It seems a bit stupid to create content to just postpone the inevitable.

[SuperVulcan]

No

[Zardoc]

I_Jedi wrote...

[EricHVela]

No. Except that EA has already said no new endings (EA Latin America). BW will obey.

I am already dissatisfied. It is sad that a good game is overshadowed so much by its ending. (I should not equate it to the Titanic disasters because that is distasteful and disrespectful, but I cannot help my mind going to that event thinking of playing a fun game only to reach that ending.)

[sandhawk]

and no

[Deviija]

No.

If I am forced to to either 'yes' or 'no.' But, I really need clarification on their 'clarification' DLC message first. If by 'not changing the ending' their DLC adds on to the ending and gives a real ending, like breaking out of indoctrination dreams, or it's a nightmare, or whatever other silly Twilight Zone maneuver around the ending while still providing a real ending, then I can live with that just fine. Really, I just want it to make sense and to see character epilogues and epilogue stories based on all my (major/minor/most of the) decisions.

[Mark Havel]

No.

[xcomcmdr]

Warp92 wrote...

One word..? fine..

No.

[ofish]

 No

[Swordfishtrombone]

Most likely no. (I can't see how "clarification" without alteration of elements in the ending can adress it's most major problems.)

[InsaneAzrael]

No.

OP, please make a poll in future for yes/no questions.
If you don't want people to comment, a poll is probably a better option. This is a forum. People talk (at length).

Modifié par InsaneAzrael, 04 avril 2012 - 04:07 .

[Grimwick]

No.

[Grimwick]

Slidell505 wrote...

If

I think you mean since.

FFFFFUUUUUUUUU BIOWAARE!! 

[SimonTheFrog]

NO

[Lietuvis]

no