608 réponses à ce sujet

[IronSabbath88]

Dan Willis wrote...

Nope.

And the indoctrination theory would be worse. "Hey we wanted to do something deep and psychological but we ran out of time and couldn't finish it. Sorry."

Never ascribe deep psychological meaning to that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.

Did you pick Control or Synthesis?

That said, no, but I'm confident it's something much bigger.

[Chaussette]

NO

[Barbarossa2010]

No. And no DLC or future products as well. Clarifying crap is rather pointless...it's still crap. Don't like where Bioware's been heading since DA2. This will just seal the deal.

[shnellegaming]

no

[DavidMW]

No, Even with "clarification" the endings would still suck. New endings or I walk!

[dkear1]

Hell NO!!!!

[joxer333]

No

[Alanor_N7]

No !!

[NovaM4]

No.

[Senario]

NO!!

[Gemini1179]

I think it would be so funny if BioWare announced they are merely 'clarifying' things and inserting a few deleted scenes here and there and then move right into a big Take Back Omega DLC push only to have everyone in the audience stand up, chuckle mirthlessly and then leave shaking their heads.

[Kyrick]

Gemini1179 wrote...

I think it would be so funny if BioWare announced they are merely 'clarifying' things and inserting a few deleted scenes here and there and then move right into a big Take Back Omega DLC push only to have everyone in the audience stand up, chuckle mirthlessly and then leave shaking their heads.

This would be perhaps the biggest condemnation that they could suffer.  Even if the simple majority of people left, it'd still have an effect.

Having said this, it won't happen.  There'll be too many toadies and gaming 'journalists' that are present for anything like this to happen.

[smokey_uk]

No

[soulprovider]

 Big NO, so long to the star wars of my generation

[Verit]

No.

Modifié par -Draikin-, 04 avril 2012 - 06:29 .

[Quilate]

No.

[sp0ck 06]

Yes, as long as it explains some major unanswered questions

[MartinPenwald]

Depends on what "clarification" and "epilogue" actually means. If it fills in all the blanks so the ending makes sense (the "clarification" part) and provides some much needed closure for Shepard and team (the "epilogue" part), this might work.

That said, I'd much rather have additional endings I can choose freely/based on what I did. Whether putting something like that into the game is feasible, though, remains to be seen.

[khankar]

no. and i'm not buying any DLC either. I had 2000 MS points saved for ME3 DLC. I'll find something else to spend that on.

[earlmobile]

Yes.

[SaladinDheonqar]

Oh hells no.

[VaddixBell]

Nope. That ending is a cop out. It's the lazy way out introducing a god like character in the last 10 minutes.

The ending completely abandoned what was great about Mass Effect in the last section and I don't know how anyone in that company can be proud of that ending.

[evildeathbloody]

NO

[Gamer790]

Well OP, let me answer your question with a question of my own. Does explaining the chemical composition of a mass of fecal matter make it not fecal matter?

Modifié par Gamer790, 04 avril 2012 - 09:12 .

[STEEEEVE]

No.