Aller au contenu

Photo

Are there any WORSE endings in Sci-FI than ME3's?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
297 réponses à ce sujet

#251
Kloreep

Kloreep
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

blackangel209 wrote...

I don't get why everyone always harps on the BSG ending. Besides the Kara Thrace BS, the "god" stuff was pretty much telegraphed from day 1. And then they explicitly say in the ending that it isn't actually "God". I think the ending lacked some elaboration, but fit well enough in terms of character and plot.


This may be a bit rude, but I just have to comment that a Retake banner-flying member painting all objections to the BSG ending with the same brush is a bit funny. ;)

#252
VerdantSF

VerdantSF
  • Members
  • 812 messages
BSG ended pretty badly.

#253
blackangel209

blackangel209
  • Members
  • 134 messages

Kloreep wrote...

This may be a bit rude, but I just have to comment that a Retake banner-flying member painting all objections to the BSG ending with the same brush is a bit funny. ;)

I didn't see BSG until well after any controversy would have occured, so I don't intend to paint all objections with the same brush as I'm sure there are plenty that I missed. But from what I picked up from the ending, it certainly wasn't one of the worst endings in Science Fiction history and seemed rather consistent with what came before it. The ME3 ending comes out of freaking nowhere and everyone acts completely out of character(except perhaps Anderson).

Modifié par blackangel209, 04 avril 2012 - 10:13 .


#254
Kloreep

Kloreep
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

blackangel209 wrote...

I didn't see BSG until well after any controversy would have occured, so I don't intend to paint all objections with the same brush as I'm sure there are plenty that I missed.


Fair enough. For my part, I shouldn't get my back up so easily. :)

blackangel209 wrote...

everyone acts completely out of character.


That's what I said about the BSG ending a couple pages back. ;)

With both ME3 and BSG, I found a disconnect between the universe of the ending and the universe I was shown before that. Though in my personal case, my issues with ME3 aren't quite as much with characters (though I guess there's Shepard) as they are with the plot logic of the final explanations & final events.

Modifié par Kloreep, 04 avril 2012 - 10:16 .


#255
MentalKase

MentalKase
  • Members
  • 225 messages
Well Farscape had a pretty lousy ending with John and Arun getting killed on that boat. Fortinutely they release a post Mini-Series that showed the true ending and gave the fans what they wanted.

So yeah still better than Mass Effect 3.

#256
Qareen

Qareen
  • Members
  • 82 messages
I found the ending to the second Dune book pretty dissapointing and depressing. I didn't want to read the rest of the series after that.

Don't think it was quite as bad as ME3 though.

#257
CyanidPontifex

CyanidPontifex
  • Members
  • 333 messages
The finale reminded me of the last episode of Farscape: conflicts resolved, everyone happy, and then BAM, something comes out of left field and everything is ruined. To be fair, they were not planning for that to be the end of the series, and were eventually able to set things right with the Peacekeeper Wars.

#258
The Charnel Expanse

The Charnel Expanse
  • Members
  • 278 messages
Lost had a ****ty ending that lasted 2 seasons. As bad as ME3's is, at least it's mercifully brief.

Modifié par The Charnel Expanse, 04 avril 2012 - 10:37 .


#259
KarmaZ

KarmaZ
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Hey I know this is not a sci-fi game but it's got to be the worst ending I've ever seen.

Modifié par KarmaZ, 04 avril 2012 - 10:38 .


#260
Tovanus

Tovanus
  • Members
  • 470 messages
BSG had a terrible ending.

99% of the series you have a character like Lee going, "It is critical to the future of the human race that we preserve our constitutional ideals and legal paradigms, etc." Then you get to the last few minutes: "You know what guys? Nevermind. Let's all spread out, give up technology, and merge with the cavemen."

It was actually very similar to ME 3 in that the whole series leads up to certain understanding and acceptance between the humans and the Cylons, and the goal of abandoning technology does not seem to be a driving force in the series. Until the last few minutes.

The Starbuck storyline was just awful. People thought there would be a deeper explanation to how and why her dead character came back to life. Something a bit more thoughtful than, "God must have done it." If God is going to get involved to that degree, then why the hell wouldn't God just do more? A little divine intervention works if the deity's goal is for people to make the right decisions and the deity just wants to offer guidance while letting human history be determined by human free will. A little more divine intervention can work in a story if you explain some ground rules restricting how powerful the deity is. But when you set no restrictions, and God just starts resurrecting characters and implanting mental instructions, your story loses a lot of its compelling power. Showing the audience that you had no explanation and making "God did it" your fallback position at the end means your series will rightly be regarded as having a "bad ending."

And all of that doesn't even TOUCH on the fact that the series started out every episode by telling you that the Cylons have a "plan." Guess what? They didn't. No plan. They were making it up as they went along. In an interview, Ronald Moore admitted that they stuck that phrase in at the start of each episode because a showrunner - who had no plan - thought it would sound cool and draw people in. In a humorous twist, they released a DVD called "The Plan," which essentially reveals to the audience that there was no larger plan. They were just chasing the humans because... what the hell else were they going to do? They kind of wanted to finish the humans off. That's not a plan... that's a goal. "Plan" implies you've laid out a thoughtful path on how to achieve your goal. And keeping the goal secret, while calling out that there's a hidden plan, implies that the goal is more complex and interesting than, "Ugh, kill the humans I guess?"

All of that said, BSG started to show that the writers were lost and didn't know what they were doing when they went to Iraq. Oh wait, I mixed that up. I mean, when they went to "New Caprica." I guess in that regard, ME 3 was more disappointing. I was expecting to be let down at the end of BSG, and I got what I expected.

Modifié par Tovanus, 04 avril 2012 - 10:40 .


#261
Vexia2070

Vexia2070
  • Members
  • 260 messages
OP's title said in 'Sci-Fi" so I assumed not just gaming....

I was going to say "Plan Nine From Outer Space" and "Attack of the killer Tomatoes"
But I can't because they made me laugh with or at them and didn't cause depression.

#262
FlyingSquirrel

FlyingSquirrel
  • Members
  • 2 105 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...
On topic, Signs is the only ending as bad as ME3 I can think of. Those aliens couldn´t survive on Earth´s atmosphere, much less walking around naked, turning the movie into a joke.


Speaking of M. Night Shyamalan, "The Village" also fell flat for me once it became clear what was really happening. It's probably not really sci-fi, though.

On a similar note, I remember finding the TV movie of Stephen King's "The Langoliers" pretty disappointing in the end. I'd been enjoying the story as a supernatural mystery, and I actually kind of liked the twist on the idea of time travel. Then it turned out that the real threat was...




[SPOILER]





...a bunch of disembodied mouths destroying the past by eating it.

OTOH, I wouldn't put the pre-revelation sections of either "The Village" or "The Langoliers" in the same league as Mass Effect.

#263
Flammenpanzer

Flammenpanzer
  • Members
  • 438 messages

curufinwe03 wrote...

The series finale of Stargate was definitly worse.
Just remember how O'Neill sacrifices himself to destroy all the Stargates in the Galaxy, so he could kill all Goa'uld. The Stargates blew up and killed millions of people in the whole Milky Way. This episode was really horrible.
Oh wait. THAT was the bad dream.


Actually, Stargate Atlantis had a pretty bad ending...I did not like that one.

#264
BARRAGE 74

BARRAGE 74
  • Members
  • 164 messages
Yells, "Battlestar Galactica!".  Then stomps away.

#265
Drogonion

Drogonion
  • Members
  • 291 messages
I can't think of a worse ending either. ME3 has definitely raised the fail bar for bad narrative endings in my experience.

BSG's ending imho is not in the same league as ME3.  ME3's ending has almost ZERO cathartic value, and pretty much destroys the (replayability of the) entire franchise.  Most of the passions developed over 100 hours of gameplay had nowhere to go at the end. :devil:

Modifié par Drogonion, 04 avril 2012 - 10:53 .


#266
TekFanX

TekFanX
  • Members
  • 509 messages
I can't think of anything that disappointed me more.
Nor anything that was worse.

Until now every ending I've read or watched offered at least one of the following characteristics:
-It was cosistent to the lore of its series.
-Its characters didn't change suddenly.
-It was concluding the story
-Or it was at least inspiring on any level for me.

Mass Effect 3's ending is the first ending that managed to fail at all points in my eyes.

#267
Merwanor

Merwanor
  • Members
  • 543 messages
I have not seen the ending for BSG, the series started to suck so bad after season 3, even then I was on the brink of dropping the series, but the season ending for season 3 was pretty good if I remember correctly.

At this moment I can't think of any Sci Fi movie, series or game that has a worse ending than Mass Effect. There are some bad ones, but no ending for a sci fi game, movie, book or series has ever made me depressed.

#268
Drxx

Drxx
  • Members
  • 209 messages


But this is better actually...

#269
chris fenton

chris fenton
  • Members
  • 569 messages
Deus Ex..
Oh wait, ****, they're the same. Nevermind, then.

#270
Versidious

Versidious
  • Members
  • 583 messages

Tovanus wrote...

BSG had a terrible ending.

99% of the series you have a character like Lee going, "It is critical to the future of the human race that we preserve our constitutional ideals and legal paradigms, etc." Then you get to the last few minutes: "You know what guys? Nevermind. Let's all spread out, give up technology, and merge with the cavemen."

It was actually very similar to ME 3 in that the whole series leads up to certain understanding and acceptance between the humans and the Cylons, and the goal of abandoning technology does not seem to be a driving force in the series. Until the last few minutes.

The Starbuck storyline was just awful. People thought there would be a deeper explanation to how and why her dead character came back to life. Something a bit more thoughtful than, "God must have done it." If God is going to get involved to that degree, then why the hell wouldn't God just do more? A little divine intervention works if the deity's goal is for people to make the right decisions and the deity just wants to offer guidance while letting human history be determined by human free will. A little more divine intervention can work in a story if you explain some ground rules restricting how powerful the deity is. But when you set no restrictions, and God just starts resurrecting characters and implanting mental instructions, your story loses a lot of its compelling power. Showing the audience that you had no explanation and making "God did it" your fallback position at the end means your series will rightly be regarded as having a "bad ending."

And all of that doesn't even TOUCH on the fact that the series started out every episode by telling you that the Cylons have a "plan." Guess what? They didn't. No plan. They were making it up as they went along. In an interview, Ronald Moore admitted that they stuck that phrase in at the start of each episode because a showrunner - who had no plan - thought it would sound cool and draw people in. In a humorous twist, they released a DVD called "The Plan," which essentially reveals to the audience that there was no larger plan. They were just chasing the humans because... what the hell else were they going to do? They kind of wanted to finish the humans off. That's not a plan... that's a goal. "Plan" implies you've laid out a thoughtful path on how to achieve your goal. And keeping the goal secret, while calling out that there's a hidden plan, implies that the goal is more complex and interesting than, "Ugh, kill the humans I guess?"

All of that said, BSG started to show that the writers were lost and didn't know what they were doing when they went to Iraq. Oh wait, I mixed that up. I mean, when they went to "New Caprica." I guess in that regard, ME 3 was more disappointing. I was expecting to be let down at the end of BSG, and I got what I expected.


BSG is definitely the worst in recent years. All along they're asking 'Can human beings retain high civilised ideals through severely trying times, such as total war'? The answer? 'No, but we can go back to being cavemen for a while because God wants us to.'. What the hell?

What it has in common with ME3 is that when I revisit the first part, I *remember* being really excited by hints dropped, promising plot lines, but cannot be so now that I know the writers had no idea what they were doing and all but abandoned most of the plot lines, except for the mysterious divine interference one. But, at least they let us know what happened to all of the characters...  :mellow:

#271
Elios

Elios
  • Members
  • 532 messages

DESTRAUDO wrote...

Noatz wrote...

Leafs43 wrote...

Noatz wrote...

If you count Evangelion as sci fi then its probably about the only thing that could legitimately be called worse than ME3's ending.

If not I think you'd be hard pressed to find an ending that more thoroughly taints a franchise.


But they ended up retconning it then created a movie as an "I'm sorry".


Indeed.

*looks at BioWare*


They took all of the fan complaints and made their wishes come true while retaining and extending the totally trippy ending the original had. People complained that asuka never got to have a proper fight, so they had her fight a ass load of MP evas , then lose and get eaten. She died horribly. Horribly! They even made it look like she was going to win that fight until near the very end of it the evas began regenerating. At one point in the movie the death threats anno got were flashed up on screen. 

If you think EOE was an 'i'm sorry' from gainax, think again. 


this EoE wasnt an "im sorry" its more of a "F YOU" lol
and you know what if they did that with ME3 id be ok with it lol

#272
the red boon

the red boon
  • Members
  • 465 messages

stcalvin13 wrote...

Can anyone think of any?  I can't.  

Syfy channel, this thread is fail. 

#273
Elios

Elios
  • Members
  • 532 messages

Makatak wrote...

Battlefield Earth?


the whole thing was bad novel wasnt any better


chris fenton wrote...

Deus Ex..
Oh wait, ****, they're the same. Nevermind, then.


Deus Ex: HR's end worked in context with the game and was really good as it made sence and didnt have HUGE plot holes 

Modifié par Elios, 05 avril 2012 - 03:05 .


#274
TheNerd182

TheNerd182
  • Members
  • 7 messages

Zolt51 wrote...

TheNerd182 wrote...

Forever Free (sequel to The Forever War) and the Rise of Endymion come to mind for me. Rama Revealed too.
Not nearly as bad because they gradually fell apart but still incredibly unsatisfying conclusions to their respective series.


Haven't read "Forever Free", but Rise of Endymion? Oh you heathen you. Loved these books and they had one of the most powerful, mind twisting endings of all.

Fall of Hyperion by the way had an ending very similar to Mass Effect 3. The portal network is destroyed, galactic dark age ensues. And it's widely considered a cult classic.

Rama was kind of lame but well, the books had to head *somewhere*... The first Rama was great because it was mostly a huge enigma wrapped in mystery. But the more you discover about the universe and the more it loses its mystique.

The Neutronium Alchemist by Peter F. Hamilton. That was the conclusion of a really great series, and in the end it
s "space magic" at its worst: the protagonist finds the "god" device that allows him to remake the universe to his liking, undo the damage, save everybody and get the girl.

That's a commong problem when you set up your protagonist against some seemingly impossible odds. Resolution has to come as some form of Deus Ex Machina.. unless you set it up very cleverly right from the start.




"Fall of Hyperion" is an incredible book and yes, the end is similar
to ME3 in that the portals are destroyed, BUT the book didn’t take a shift in
tone/theme at any point. The book is dark as hell and everyone knew something
terrible was going to happen to everyone. The first two books in the "Hyperion Cantos" I'm sure we both agree are classics and represent the best of what science fiction can produce.



The "Endymion" books on the other hand are terrible. 100's of pages are wasted on
describing scenery. Yes the writing is poetry but the story moves at a SNAILS
pace. This problem is compounded by the fact that the protagonist is a boring
half-wit who makes some questionable decisions - and is also a pedophile. The plot meanders and plot threads go nowhere. And how about the fact that they directly contradict the first two books, making up some kind of framework story to explain the plot holes? Unacceptable.


Oh ya and the girl - the so called "prophet" - was even more boring. If you’re
going to put a messiah into your book make sure they are BELIEVABLE. Paul
Atredies I would follow to my death. The chick from "Endymion" I
would laugh at. She seems more like a character from "Mean Girls"
than a messiah in a dark sci-fi epic. The entire two books (long ones at that) could have been fit into 400
pages. And I still would have hated it but at least I wouldnt have been
bored to tears.



I agree with you about Rama, ya, it had to go 'somewhere' and it would have
been disappointing no matter what. That’s why the sequels never should have
been written.

Never read "The Neutronium Alchemist".

To anyone hating on the end to 2001, watch/read it again. Yes its obscure, but thats the idea. It is NOT a terrible ending. That story explores the evolution of intelligent life and the existence of 'God'. It is not an action movie. How did you think it would end?

To people talking about the end to Foundation - I remember being disappointed by the change in tone from Second
Foundation to Foundation's edge. Of course there WAS 30 years in between
the two books and Asimov's style changed as well. See Naked Sun to
Robots of Dawn for a similar shift in tone and style. Don't even get me
started on the Prequels to the Foundation books. Asimov is better than
that.

His best books are the Galactic Empire books anyway. It's a
shame they were out of print for awhile. Good classic Science Fiction
adventure stories.
Foundation was great as well - of course - as was The Gods Themselves.


By the way, any science fiction reader STAY AWAY from "Dune 7" (Hunters/Sandworms). Good god Brian Herbert/Kevin J. Anderson ruined that ending fast. Not to mention such disasters as "Paul of Dune" and "The Winds of Dune"... Sometimes I think I like torturing myself because I keep reading these atrocities but maybe its just because I cant believe they could screw up Dune any worse... and curiosity gets the better of me.

Modifié par TheNerd182, 05 avril 2012 - 05:19 .


#275
DarkBladeX98

DarkBladeX98
  • Members
  • 632 messages
hmmmm.....
what about say, wait, no.
can't think of any more disappointing.