Normandy run at endscene explained
#201
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:42
#202
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:44
Againstallodds14 wrote...
heres my thinking, is it really joker? if the indoc idea is right ( witch the indoc idea has plotholes to) then the Normandy & Joker is just Shepards mind flying away from the blast thats taking the reapers out of shepards mind. thats just my opinion.
That is the only way I can bear thinking about it whether I agree with Indoc or not.
#203
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:48
Modifié par Xena In Heels, 04 avril 2012 - 04:50 .
#204
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:50
#205
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:50
likta_ wrote...
How does Joker know that the beam is going to kill EDI?
This.
And how does he (or EDI) initiate the FTL jump AFTER they see the wave, when it travels faster then light...?
#206
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:53
I always bring Javik with me on the mission, and my LI and Javik ALWAYS walk out fo the Normandy. That scene is so uncharacteristic of Joker it's like Batman decided killing criminals is more effective.Fat Headed Wolf wrote...
I love how in my playthrough I chose Synthesis and took EDI with me on the charge down the hill towards the beam. Apparently Joker was brave enough to swoop down and save his girlfriend but not brave enough to fight.
Saved his lady and ran...
#207
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:54
Provo_101 wrote...
Yeah, no one other than Shepard knows jack about the Skittles beam. Sorry.
Star Child and the Multi-colored Skittles beam!
I bet it'd be a hit on broadway.
#208
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
#209
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:05
Sorry, what was the large disconnect? We were talking about his ability to see the beam due to it's speed, which was established moments ago in three scenes in which it's speed differs dramatically (this is an understatement).Kandon Arc wrote...
What I'm saying is that this is the first time that such a large disconnect has appeared betwen the established rules of the universe and observed events. An author has leeway in bending the rules he creates, but he shouldn't go too far and nor should he leave it unexplained. A good example is the shift from infinite ammo to thermal clips between ME1 and ME2. This was done for gameplay reasons but they did also make time to explain it in a believable way.
I certainly agree there is a good deal of rule bending going on here, but only slightly more so than much of the rest of the series. The difference is the willingness of disbelief, which arguably is the fault of the author (because at that point most of us are picturing xzibit and/or annoyed about the railroading) but taken in isolation I only see a few problems (as in actual flaws, rather than quality, which is another matter) with the scene (mostly the sudden appearance of team members) that aren't either solvable through implications or readily understandable.
We're nitpicking. Which is fair enough. But I find it wierd to try to pick nits off of the great hairy seething apes that represent the endings actual problems in this analogy.
#210
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:06
Period.
#211
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:12
#212
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:15
It cant be explained cause it makes no logical sense....unless....
God did it!
#213
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:25
In my case Ashley and Vega were both lying in a pool of their own blood....
#214
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:27
#215
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:28
"Speculation for Everyone!"
Modifié par soren4ever, 04 avril 2012 - 05:29 .
#216
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:29
Friends take explosions in the face for friends.likta_ wrote...
Watching this thread I realized Rick Astley would have been a better friend then Joker, because he wouldn't have "give me up" "let me down" "run around and desert me". Screw you Joker!
#217
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:29
Sinekein wrote...
Naturalus wrote...
This run scene for Normandy on fits only if Shepard choice synthetic life killing ending I do not understand why same Normandy run scene comes if Shepard choice synthesis or control ending. Controls ending dont harm EDI and synthesis helps Joker and EDI become lovers even better.
That's kind of the problem here.
It´s a problem, further there are the teleporting squadmates, then how the f***k does Joker know about what`s going on at the deus ex machina, why does he leave the ballte...which he must have cause somehow he got to the relay and used it (seeing as the crash-landing-planet is not around earth) or gotton quite far away from the relay.
I disagree with the topics name, no offens.
#218
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:12
likta_ wrote...
How does Joker know that the beam is going to kill EDI?
Because there was a microphone in Shepard's butt.
Modifié par QuarkZ26, 04 avril 2012 - 06:18 .
#219
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:13
#220
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:17
#221
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:22
#222
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:23
Joker had time to land on Earth, pick up the entire crew and make a run for the mass relay, and still outrun the explosion.
Sorry, OP, but this scene can't be explained, only scratched.
#223
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:24
TheGreenAlloy wrote...
Yeah, yeah they could.Naturalus wrote...
They could not make ending where some players could continue playing and others not.
Shepard is alive at the end of the destroy ending if you have enough EMS. People who picked that one could technically still play.
#224
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:26
And how did Ash get on board when she was just with me a minute ago getting shot at by Harbinger?
Modifié par Special J, 04 avril 2012 - 06:27 .
#225
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 06:57
Beti88 wrote...
Joker would've NEVER leave this battle. He simply would not.
Period.
Actually, now tat I think about it, where the hell did Javik go? He apparently borded the normandy as Iwnet in the beam............ now that makes even less sense.





Retour en haut






