After ME3, will you play Dragon Age 3 at release?
#176
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:51
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
#177
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:51
#178
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:51
#179
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:52
#180
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:52
ME3 was the only thing that got me to install Origin. I'm not sorry to have to ditch it and never look at it again.
Also....Even though I did not jump on the BF3 bandwagon, EA pulled one of the biggest 'on my crap list' moves in the book (my book at least). They took a competitive multiplayer game and let people buy there way into it. Totally negating the time and effort people put in to acquire weapons/kits whatever.
That is a big-big no no in my book.
I'm not saying I won't down the line pick up a Bioware title out of the bargain bin or something. $10 bucks for a ultimate edition or some such a couple years down the line-then hack out the Origin requirements. But that is about it. Probably not even DA3. I'm not interested in playing DA2 if someone gave it to me for free.
#181
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:53
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
What?
ME1: You kill Saren, Sovereign blows up. Very little room for speculation.
ME2: Collector base blows up/gets taken by Cerberus, huge Reaper fleet is coming. Very little room for speculation.
ME3: WTF JUST HAPPENED?
#182
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:54
Sywen wrote...
I'll probably wait until I see actual player reviews.
me too
JPR out!
#183
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
Grasich wrote...
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
What?
ME1: You kill Saren, Sovereign blows up. Very little room for speculation.
ME2: Collector base blows up/gets taken by Cerberus, huge Reaper fleet is coming. Very little room for speculation.
ME3: WTF JUST HAPPENED?
+1
ME1 and 2 give rooms for more adventures, but never let you speculate anything about a bunch of plotholes...
JPR out!
#184
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
We live in an era of anonymous online fan-fiction in a wide variety of formats where if every single facet of someones specific interpretation of a popular game isn't EXACTLY up to snuff, then burning the house down is the only response.
I agree with those fans that accept that the Dragon Age development team is separate from the Mass Effect development team - under the same company roof - and refuse to lump both franchises together.
After a month of constant media chatter over public blowback from ME3, I've come to the conclusion that despite sharing the impression of the ending[s] with the most vocal contingent of fans, that what I would most like to understand about how the finale of Mass Effect 3 came about is why the game ending breaks with what the key people stated about the expected conclusion prior to release and why they refuse to explain their reasons for pulling a fast one on us.
That answer may not be provided. Artistic integrity aside, when corporations circle the wagons you may as well side with the savages who wanna burn those suckers out. Doesn't mean that I'm abandoning Dragon Age in response.
#185
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
It will have to be the most awesome, most brilliant, most prefect game EVER - if they want me to buy it. We've seen how a deadline can destroy a trilogy.
#186
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
Grasich wrote...
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
What?
ME1: You kill Saren, Sovereign blows up. Very little room for speculation.
ME2: Collector base blows up/gets taken by Cerberus, huge Reaper fleet is coming. Very little room for speculation.
ME3: WTF JUST HAPPENED?
and ME3: You defeat the Reapers. Neither the ME1 ending or the ME2 ending end with any sort of hint toward the future. They're entirely based on the present. And defeating the reapers was the present.
#187
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:56
#188
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:57
Of course, I was already skipping DA3 because of the crap that was DA2.
#189
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:57
#190
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:57
TheJediSaint wrote...
Probably, Dragon Age is done by a completely different development team. It's not their fault ME3 had a nonsensical ending.
You mean, the team that gave us the gem that was DAII. Yay, trust.
Sorry, no.
One company, one pocketbook. They want my money, they can bloody well earn it by selling me what I want.
#191
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:58
wetnasty wrote...
Grasich wrote...
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
What?
ME1: You kill Saren, Sovereign blows up. Very little room for speculation.
ME2: Collector base blows up/gets taken by Cerberus, huge Reaper fleet is coming. Very little room for speculation.
ME3: WTF JUST HAPPENED?
and ME3: You defeat the Reapers. Neither the ME1 ending or the ME2 ending end with any sort of hint toward the future. They're entirely based on the present. And defeating the reapers was the present.
No, you don't defeat the reapers, you do reaper's job. That's the Wtf just happened moment.
If the kid started to sing trolololol it would had made more sense.
#192
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:58
not after got burned with ME3.
#193
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:58
Grasich wrote...
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
What?
ME1: You kill Saren, Sovereign blows up. Very little room for speculation.
ME2: Collector base blows up/gets taken by Cerberus, huge Reaper fleet is coming. Very little room for speculation.
ME3: WTF JUST HAPPENED?
++
Agreed. With 1 I had the feeling, 'Oh yeah, somewhere in the future we'll kick Reaper ass!'
2: 'Okay. Strange opening, but w/e. Next time, we'll kill the Reapers for sure!'
3: 'Uh... is this supposed to be the end or what? But I've got a gazillion questions left!'
Edit: Questions, not quests :innocent:
Modifié par TUHD, 04 avril 2012 - 04:59 .
#194
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:59
#195
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 04:59
#196
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:00
#197
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:01
wetnasty wrote...
Yes. Dragon Age endings have always given me more closure.
I don't know why so many people are surprised by the ME3 endings though. Mass Effect endings have NEVER given closure and always been left up to speculation. This is not news.
There is a difference between "no closure", and deus ex machina, more plotholes in the last 10 minutes than in the entire rest of the series, destruction of character traits, abandonment of themes, a complete tonal swap, abandonment of the main conflict, a sudden introduction of bad symbology into a literal scene, complete destruction of the universe, and some blatant ripping off.
Also, Mass Effect was always meant as a trilogy. Dragon Age was not. Part 3 should have had more closure.
#198
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:01
#199
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:02
#200
Posté 04 avril 2012 - 05:03





Retour en haut





