They're not gouging. They're charging.Hellbound555 wrote...
EA's strategy: Get us hooked on a game, then price gouge and jack up the prices when we're enjoying it......?
*audience laughter*
They're not gouging. They're charging.Hellbound555 wrote...
EA's strategy: Get us hooked on a game, then price gouge and jack up the prices when we're enjoying it......?
f0rmaldehyde wrote...
Imagine you own a cupcake shop. Everyone loves your cupcakes. Business is good and there are hundreds of fatties who sink hundreds of dollars into your business everytime you make a new cupcake. Then...one day you decide to make a speciality fish cupake. You mix that fish into your delicious batter thinking to yourself "this is so artsy and amazing. Everyone is going to love it!" You decide to release the fish cupcake with three different types of fish.
grand opening night everyone hates your fish cupcakes. You try to explain to them that there are different flavoured fish cupcakes but everyone insists that you executed your new cupcake venture poorly in light of your previous overwhelming success. Your cupcake fans still feel like despite the fact that they are eating different fish, its still fish and it tastes like butt.
Indignantly you tell everyone who doesnt like the fish cupcakes to get out as they are too inferior to understand the deeper meaning of the fish cupcake. Its surely THEIR fault. Later in the week cupcake sales plummet, but still those fish cupcakes are at the front of your cupcake display cabinet. Is it possible you made a terrible mistake? NO! of course not!
Later, the cupcake shop is voted worst shop in the mall. Ppssst. They dont know anything. Clearly they know nothing about cupcakes. Months pass, the cupcake store closes as its patrons have all left except a couple of weird kids that pay each other to eat the fish cupcakes, and one or two hipsters who think that the fish cupcakes have a deeper meaning akin to their favourite song. A few days ago in a final act of desperation you brought back the good old cupcakes everyone loved but still nobody came, the foul texture of fishy-cupcake still lingering in their mouths. A final last ditch effort to keep your doors from closing.
moral to the story: dont put fish in cupcakes.
UnstableMongoose wrote...
Farbautisonn wrote...
-It worked well with DA2.UnstableMongoose wrote... It's because not enough people want to spend the effort to be reasonable, respectful, and patient about this problem getting fixed.
-it worked well with the Bazaar for the intl customers.
-it worked well with Deception which still sells as is, with no news 1½ months after a revision was "promised".
-it has worked well with ME3 so far.
So... tell us again how "reasonably, respectfull and patient helps getting problems fixed" as it were?
You have assumed a causation when all you have is correlation by implying that your poor behavior got things changed earlier. Human nature being what it is, you're almost guaranteed to be the opposite of correct. If you you want someone to fix a problem, telling them what the problem is using a methodology a rational human being can understand is more likely to get results.
barenas wrote...
Just shows how insular the voters of that poll or whatever it was are. EA is small time compared to a lot of the big corporations out there. I mean, how was Halliburton not even in that list?
Video games are serious business.barenas wrote...
Just shows how insular the voters of that poll or whatever it was are. EA is small time compared to a lot of the big corporations out there. I mean, how was Halliburton not even in that list?
Skelter192 wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
Heh, Kotaku already wrote a couple "is EA really so bad?" articles today.CrustyBot wrote...
Then watch sites like Kotaku or IGN fellate them for not only listening to "entitled, whiny gamers", but also offering them an olive branch in the form of discounted games.
Kotaku is so childish.
Next to their "gamers are sexist" article you'll see a cosplay with a barely clothed woman.
Modifié par Seagloom, 05 avril 2012 - 10:58 .
Volourn wrote...
"But when it comes to buying games, big publishers like EA, Activision, and Ubisoft control huge swathes of the market. If I want a specific service (i.e. a specific game) then I have no choice. If I want to play ME3, for instance, I have to deal with EA, I have to use their download client, and I have to accept the terms of their EULA with no option for negotiation."
You have tons of chocies in the gaming industry. EA is a big company but there are tons of competitors including both other big companies as well as smaller less known ones. It's gaming. You don't need it.
Then again, I laugh at those who voted for EA since most likely the majority of thsoe who did likely played and enjoyed at least one EA game in the past year. Hypocrites much? If EA is so awful why do you buy and play their games? It is so stupid.
f0rmaldehyde wrote...
Imagine you own a cupcake shop. Everyone loves your cupcakes. Business is good and there are hundreds of fatties who sink hundreds of dollars into your business everytime you make a new cupcake. Then...one day you decide to make a speciality fish cupake. You mix that fish into your delicious batter thinking to yourself "this is so artsy and amazing. Everyone is going to love it!" You decide to release the fish cupcake with three different types of fish.
grand opening night everyone hates your fish cupcakes. You try to explain to them that there are different flavoured fish cupcakes but everyone insists that you executed your new cupcake venture poorly in light of your previous overwhelming success. Your cupcake fans still feel like despite the fact that they are eating different fish, its still fish and it tastes like butt.
Indignantly you tell everyone who doesnt like the fish cupcakes to get out as they are too inferior to understand the deeper meaning of the fish cupcake. Its surely THEIR fault. Later in the week cupcake sales plummet, but still those fish cupcakes are at the front of your cupcake display cabinet. Is it possible you made a terrible mistake? NO! of course not!
Later, the cupcake shop is voted worst shop in the mall. Ppssst. They dont know anything. Clearly they know nothing about cupcakes. Months pass, the cupcake store closes as its patrons have all left except a couple of weird kids that pay each other to eat the fish cupcakes, and one or two hipsters who think that the fish cupcakes have a deeper meaning akin to their favourite song. A few days ago in a final act of desperation you brought back the good old cupcakes everyone loved but still nobody came, the foul texture of fishy-cupcake still lingering in their mouths. A final last ditch effort to keep your doors from closing.
moral to the story: dont put fish in cupcakes.
Seagloom wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
Heh, Kotaku already wrote a couple "is EA really so bad?" articles today.CrustyBot wrote...
Then watch sites like Kotaku or IGN fellate them for not only listening to "entitled, whiny gamers", but also offering them an olive branch in the form of discounted games.
Kotaku is so childish.
Next to their "gamers are sexist" article you'll see a cosplay with a barely clothed woman.
It's not a surprise. Gawker sites value hits above all else. Some of their contributors will post anything they think will land tons of page views--even if it's not entirely keeping within a particular site's theme. Supporting EA right after they win this dubious honor? Likely controversial enough to get more hits.
Modifié par Godak, 05 avril 2012 - 07:23 .
f0rmaldehyde wrote...
Imagine you own a cupcake shop. Everyone loves your cupcakes. Business is good and there are hundreds of fatties who sink hundreds of dollars into your business everytime you make a new cupcake. Then...one day you decide to make a speciality fish cupake. You mix that fish into your delicious batter thinking to yourself "this is so artsy and amazing. Everyone is going to love it!" You decide to release the fish cupcake with three different types of fish.
grand opening night everyone hates your fish cupcakes. You try to explain to them that there are different flavoured fish cupcakes but everyone insists that you executed your new cupcake venture poorly in light of your previous overwhelming success. Your cupcake fans still feel like despite the fact that they are eating different fish, its still fish and it tastes like butt.
Indignantly you tell everyone who doesnt like the fish cupcakes to get out as they are too inferior to understand the deeper meaning of the fish cupcake. Its surely THEIR fault. Later in the week cupcake sales plummet, but still those fish cupcakes are at the front of your cupcake display cabinet. Is it possible you made a terrible mistake? NO! of course not!
Later, the cupcake shop is voted worst shop in the mall. Ppssst. They dont know anything. Clearly they know nothing about cupcakes. Months pass, the cupcake store closes as its patrons have all left except a couple of weird kids that pay each other to eat the fish cupcakes, and one or two hipsters who think that the fish cupcakes have a deeper meaning akin to their favourite song. A few days ago in a final act of desperation you brought back the good old cupcakes everyone loved but still nobody came, the foul texture of fishy-cupcake still lingering in their mouths. A final last ditch effort to keep your doors from closing.
moral to the story: dont put fish in cupcakes.
f0rmaldehyde wrote...
Imagine you own a cupcake shop. Everyone loves your cupcakes. Business is good and there are hundreds of fatties who sink hundreds of dollars into your business everytime you make a new cupcake. Then...one day you decide to make a speciality fish cupake. You mix that fish into your delicious batter thinking to yourself "this is so artsy and amazing. Everyone is going to love it!" You decide to release the fish cupcake with three different types of fish.
grand opening night everyone hates your fish cupcakes. You try to explain to them that there are different flavoured fish cupcakes but everyone insists that you executed your new cupcake venture poorly in light of your previous overwhelming success. Your cupcake fans still feel like despite the fact that they are eating different fish, its still fish and it tastes like butt.
Indignantly you tell everyone who doesnt like the fish cupcakes to get out as they are too inferior to understand the deeper meaning of the fish cupcake. Its surely THEIR fault. Later in the week cupcake sales plummet, but still those fish cupcakes are at the front of your cupcake display cabinet. Is it possible you made a terrible mistake? NO! of course not!
Later, the cupcake shop is voted worst shop in the mall. Ppssst. They dont know anything. Clearly they know nothing about cupcakes. Months pass, the cupcake store closes as its patrons have all left except a couple of weird kids that pay each other to eat the fish cupcakes, and one or two hipsters who think that the fish cupcakes have a deeper meaning akin to their favourite song. A few days ago in a final act of desperation you brought back the good old cupcakes everyone loved but still nobody came, the foul texture of fishy-cupcake still lingering in their mouths. A final last ditch effort to keep your doors from closing.
moral to the story: dont put fish in cupcakes.
I don't understand what makes you think this line of thought is exceptable.Volourn wrote...
"But when it comes to buying games, big publishers like EA, Activision, and Ubisoft control huge swathes of the market. If I want a specific service (i.e. a specific game) then I have no choice. If I want to play ME3, for instance, I have to deal with EA, I have to use their download client, and I have to accept the terms of their EULA with no option for negotiation."
You have tons of chocies in the gaming industry. EA is a big company but there are tons of competitors including both other big companies as well as smaller less known ones. It's gaming. You don't need it.
Then again, I laugh at those who voted for EA since most likely the majority of thsoe who did likely played and enjoyed at least one EA game in the past year. Hypocrites much? If EA is so awful why do you buy and play their games? It is so stupid.
SKELETON HARVESTER wrote...
I don't understand what makes you think this line of thought is exceptable.
If people didn't play their games then how else could they know that EA is terrible at making them? And plus enjoying 1 game out of 20 in a year is less than a 1% satisfactory grade.
That's a failure if there ever was one.
Volourn wrote...
You have tons of chocies in the gaming industry. EA is a big company but there are tons of competitors including both other big companies as well as smaller less known ones. It's gaming. You don't need it.
Then again, I laugh at those who voted for EA since most likely the majority of thsoe who did likely played and enjoyed at least one EA game in the past year. Hypocrites much? If EA is so awful why do you buy and play their games? It is so stupid.
What gave you the idea that I still buy their games, let alone play them?Godak wrote...
SKELETON HARVESTER wrote...
I don't understand what makes you think this line of thought is exceptable.
If people didn't play their games then how else could they know that EA is terrible at making them? And plus enjoying 1 game out of 20 in a year is less than a 1% satisfactory grade.
That's a failure if there ever was one.
What makes you think it's unacceptable? What makes you think it's a failure? If you think EA generally makes crappy games, why buy them to see if they are crappy? If you go into a purchase expecting something, get precisely what you expect, and then blame said company for giving you what you expected (crap), aren't you the one at fault?
John Epler wrote...
I lived through ManGiraffeDog, there's nothing the ME3 forum can spring on me that would cause that reaction.
Now, adding some scotch to the coffee - that's a little different.
Darth Krytie wrote...
I personally find it disgusting that EA won this for something so trivial in comparison to what those other companies did to get on the list. Yes, making a bad choice for five minutes of gaming is so much worse than poor labour conditions. Anyone who voted for EA over other more deserving companies (who actually committed crimes) makes me sick.
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
John Epler wrote...
I lived through ManGiraffeDog, there's nothing the ME3 forum can spring on me that would cause that reaction.
Now, adding some scotch to the coffee - that's a little different.
What? Who's ManGiraffeDog?
.
Modifié par Skelter192, 06 avril 2012 - 02:23 .
DRUNK_CANADIAN wrote...
Dragoonlordz wrote...
Sorry but BoA screws you over you lose your house and become homeless, EA annoys you then you end up miffed at nothing more than your hobby. At this stage anyone who voted EA in that against many of the others is nothing more than a spoiled child.
I'm assuming you are homeless than, either that or you live in the EA basement dungeon, defending them in hopes one day you will be released from your cage.
Modifié par Rockworm503, 06 avril 2012 - 02:36 .
Modifié par Rockworm503, 06 avril 2012 - 02:36 .