Yougottawanna wrote...
I've chosen to be hopeful about the PAX announcement
Because the alternative is too hard on my alcohol budget
Militarized wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
I'm guessing you aren't known for perspicacity in real life?
EA employs hundreds of Viral marketers to spam game forums, best to just ignore obvious trolls.
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
Versidious wrote...
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
Here is the scene I was referring to:
http://youtu.be/AYXPsls5p_4?t=20s
Look at the perspective, and also compare it to the teaser trailer. 1: The teaser trailer is set after the initial invasion, the full trailer is set during. WRT the perspective... You can see it's destroying enormous futuristic skyscrapers, which I promise you would not be built in the middle of Westminster Palace, aka the UK Houses of Parliament! You don't need to worry about the Westminster clock tower (fun fact, 'Big Ben' is actually the name of the bell inside it, but not of the tower itself) being cut down.
Coats specifically said he had been inside BIG BEN sniping anything that moved.
The teaser trailer scene and that one are identical aside from the ending. Both begin with him sniping the same husk in the same manner. They are not different scenes.
I hope you are not being serious, because you do not need to go that far to defend the canonicity of a freaking trailer.
Militarized wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
I'm guessing you aren't known for perspicacity in real life?
EA employs hundreds of Viral marketers to spam game forums, best to just ignore obvious trolls.
Modifié par Fruit of the Doom, 04 avril 2012 - 11:08 .
Militarized wrote...
That... has nothing to do with what you said before, it wouldn't be the universe anyway it would be the galaxy. Obviously life is not destroyed in it's entirerty, the galactic civilization you were attempting to preserve is what gets destroyed. A dark age is common reference to a period of time when previous advacements and technology is lost, sometimes completely depending on how grimdark you want it to be.
The epilogue reinforces this, it's 10k years in the future with no space flight. So yes you're right a lot of things changed but whether it was for the better is certainly debateable and from a narrative perspective it borders on the absolute silly. If you don't mind everyone being set back in time, that's fine, but don't tout the endings as saving the civilization we were fighting to save, which is different then saving just the species.
JudgeOverdose wrote...
AtlasMickey wrote...
The line falls in two days. Make your time.
Hate to break this to you, and all of the other people who are rooting for the "line" to "fall" or "break", but there is more to holding the line than you seem to understand. There is a strong core of the movement that is displeased with BioWare for lying to the consumer, and that is why the line will not fall -- it may or may not see a victory with an ending that is consistent with what consumers were promised, but it will persist either way in the name of consumer rights.
Explaining basic economic principles to forumites would likely be met with tl;dr, so I'll spare everyone that (for now), but the bottom line is that the movement is about far more than the (admittedly subjective) opinion that the ending sucked and should be fixed; lying to your customers is objectively bad business, and if people find the avalanche of lies to be acceptable, a truly dangerous precedent is set -- one that opens to door to negatively impact all consumers, not just the ones that dislike the ending.
I know better than to expect everyone to care about things that they don't really understand, but hopes regarding the "the line will fall" or "your line will break" are akin to believing if you wish hard enough you'll sprout wings. This is (and will continue to be) about more than a game, and no announcement will put an end to it.
Modifié par Grusome11, 04 avril 2012 - 11:10 .
The Angry One wrote...
tobito113 wrote...
Dark age dosent mean the universe over and no one will ever be happy anymore, it just means alot of things changed, and im sure most who are alive and their decendants are glad of what shep did.
And just because they have some elements dosent mean they are the exact same things except for color. The cost for destroying the reapers is a galatic dark age and everything else, its a big price to pay and i like that we have to pay it, going back with rainbows and butterflies after all that happened would be terrible, but thats what some people want...
I'm finding a LOT of use out of this pic lately, my thanks to whoever made it.
Versidious wrote...
Dude, wait, what? Go how far? :-S I looked at the trailers (again, because, you know, I watched them loads before ME3 came out), which presumably you also did, tried to see what you were talking about, saw something different, then explained what I saw to you. How is that 'going far'? As for them taking place simultaneously, they're not. The full trailer scene is during the initial attack. The VO says in the second one that it's over a week AFTER the initial attack. It's really simple.
Vox77 wrote...
another spectacle of speculating spectacular speculations
The Angry One wrote...
I'm finding a LOT of use out of this pic lately, my thanks to whoever made it.
RocketManSR2 wrote...
You know, the way the "hold the line" opposers and supporters are going at it is almost as stupid as the ending to ME3.
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
Versidious wrote...
Dude, wait, what? Go how far? :-S I looked at the trailers (again, because, you know, I watched them loads before ME3 came out), which presumably you also did, tried to see what you were talking about, saw something different, then explained what I saw to you. How is that 'going far'? As for them taking place simultaneously, they're not. The full trailer scene is during the initial attack. The VO says in the second one that it's over a week AFTER the initial attack. It's really simple.
Attempting to make sense of it at all is pretty pointless.
Otherwise you'll find yourself trying to explain the remarkable coincidence of him shooting a husk attacking the same mother and child from a clocktower on two different occasions.
Oh, too late.
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
Versidious wrote...
Dude, wait, what? Go how far? :-S I looked at the trailers (again, because, you know, I watched them loads before ME3 came out), which presumably you also did, tried to see what you were talking about, saw something different, then explained what I saw to you. How is that 'going far'? As for them taking place simultaneously, they're not. The full trailer scene is during the initial attack. The VO says in the second one that it's over a week AFTER the initial attack. It's really simple.
Attempting to make sense of it at all is pretty pointless.
Otherwise you'll find yourself trying to explain the remarkable coincidence of him shooting a husk attacking the same mother and child from a clocktower on two different occasions.
Oh, too late.
tobito113 wrote...
Militarized wrote...
That... has nothing to do with what you said before, it wouldn't be the universe anyway it would be the galaxy. Obviously life is not destroyed in it's entirerty, the galactic civilization you were attempting to preserve is what gets destroyed. A dark age is common reference to a period of time when previous advacements and technology is lost, sometimes completely depending on how grimdark you want it to be.
The epilogue reinforces this, it's 10k years in the future with no space flight. So yes you're right a lot of things changed but whether it was for the better is certainly debateable and from a narrative perspective it borders on the absolute silly. If you don't mind everyone being set back in time, that's fine, but don't tout the endings as saving the civilization we were fighting to save, which is different then saving just the species.
Are you kidding me? Does the man sound like he would prefer to be dead instead of having a grandchild w/e? How can you possibly say the situation they are now if no better than being MURDERED. This is why we keep talking pass each other, all you guys can use are hyperboles and crazy arguments like this, and i hate that.
The fact that shep is now a legend is enough evidence that what he did was a great thing,and the sacrifice he made was well recieved by many is the galaxy.
Nyila wrote...
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
Versidious wrote...
Dude, wait, what? Go how far? :-S I looked at the trailers (again, because, you know, I watched them loads before ME3 came out), which presumably you also did, tried to see what you were talking about, saw something different, then explained what I saw to you. How is that 'going far'? As for them taking place simultaneously, they're not. The full trailer scene is during the initial attack. The VO says in the second one that it's over a week AFTER the initial attack. It's really simple.
Attempting to make sense of it at all is pretty pointless.
Otherwise you'll find yourself trying to explain the remarkable coincidence of him shooting a husk attacking the same mother and child from a clocktower on two different occasions.
Oh, too late.
Can you just give each other a giant hug? <3
tobito113 wrote...
Are you kidding me? Does the man sound like he would prefer to be dead instead of having a grandchild w/e? How can you possibly say the situation they are now if no better than being MURDERED. This is why we keep talking pass each other, all you guys can use are hyperboles and crazy arguments like this, and i hate that.
The fact that shep is now a legend is enough evidence that what he did was a great thing,and the sacrifice he made was well recieved by many is the galaxy.
Modifié par Militarized, 04 avril 2012 - 11:20 .
AtlasMickey wrote...
RocketManSR2 wrote...
You know, the way the "hold the line" opposers and supporters are going at it is almost as stupid as the ending to ME3.
Considering the ending is in fact not stupid, I will take that as a compliment, with the momentary sadness from knowing the other guys will still have to feel insulted.
Retour en haut
