Tocquevillain wrote...
Myrmedus wrote...
"Wrong"? About what? You haven't said what I'm wrong about. What do you mean "object"? Object to what? Object to the choices being made? The Starchild gave him a choice, if Shepard didn't make a choice from the options, Starchild would just let the Reapers do their work. What would you object to? There's nothing, your job to end the threat. You end it.
I'm totally bewildered by this, please explain.
Wrong about Shepard not having any other option.
Starchild would not have just let the Reapers do their work because it no longer ordained their work as a workable solution, hence why it was even willing in the first place to "find a new solution".
There was enough wiggle room there to interject. We were never given the option, even a failed attempt. We were simply given the option to nod our head like a little lost lamb.
I still don't understand why you need the option to interject. You didn't submit to the Catalyst, the Catalyst empowered you to determine the fate of the Reapers and the galaxy. Crikey.
Because that's what the entire game is about? Options! Injections! No! Yes! Maybe! Perhaps! Wait! ****** off! Okay! Sure! Definitely not!
I don't buy the Catalyst's bull****. I don't buy the backhanded approach it applies to each choice. I don't like any of the choices:
Destroy: I actually believe the Catalyst and the Reapers are doing what they think is right - I don't
want to destroy them.
Control: ....Er *scratches head*. In truth, maybe this will be one ending that does actually improve with clarification.
Synthesis: ....Come on, man. I don't like such blatant magic in my Sci-Fi.
The most appealing ending is Destroy but...it's still not appealing. I understand what the Reapers are trying to do, they're just incorrect. They're misguided IMO. I want a resolution. I want to broker the peace like I did all the way through ME3, or at least
try. I want to have the option to tell the Catalyst it's wrong.
Modifié par Myrmedus, 05 avril 2012 - 09:32 .