Capeo wrote...
Laurcus wrote...
Capeo wrote...
LDStaredown wrote...
Thank the Goddess. Please let it be indoctrination theory.
You have to be kidding. It is just added epilogues and cutscenes. As I have said five million times before. IT is, and always has been, absolute BS. They aren't changing the endings.
It's amazing. You would have thought Ray's blog post would have been enough to put IT to bed when he outright said these are the endings. Now you have a release saying they will add some videos and epilogues (no gameplay) which should finally put this IT crap to bed and people still cling to it? Unreal.
I also think IT isn't true, but this information in no way disproves it. BioWare is being very vague, possibly intentionally so. They say they're
not changing the endings, they're adding clarification. That's so vague
it could be anything.
For example, they could simply say that we don't understand the ending,
because we haven't seen the whole thing. The "clarification" would then
reveal that Goku stopped the Reapers while Shepard was unconscious, and
everything after that point was just a dream. They didn't directly
contradict the previous ending, and they added clarification, so
technically, they didn't lie. Even though we now have an ending where
Goku saves the day.
Obviously I'm being facetious. My point though, is that due to the vague
wording, they can change anything they feel like without actually
changing anything. This means nothing is off the table, and nothing is
any different than it was before the announcement, except we know it
will be coming in summer.
There's nothing vague about it. Cinematics has a very absolute meaning in development. It's a non-interactive cutscene. Epilogue has a very specific meaning in this game. Another non-interactive cutscene. There is no gameplay. If there was it wouldn't be free and they would be certainly highlight that in their announcement.
Pay attention! I'm saying the meaning of clarification is vague, not epilogue, or cutscenes, or whatever!
Gameplay is NOT a requisite for changing the endings. They could do that with 2 minutes of cutscenes. And the word clarification is vague enough that they can change anything without actually changing anything so that they're still technically right.
Read this again until you get it.
For example, they could simply say that we don't understand the ending,
because we haven't seen the whole thing. The "clarification" would then
reveal that Goku stopped the Reapers while Shepard was unconscious, and
everything after that point was just a dream. They didn't directly
contradict the previous ending, and they added clarification, so
technically, they didn't lie. Even though we now have an ending where
Goku saves the day.
Modifié par Laurcus, 05 avril 2012 - 02:08 .