3212 réponses à ce sujet

[Tamcia]

rofl
Extended cut - 5 mins of horror turned into 15 mins of horror. Skeptical about this....

[TheShinySword]

We have DLC,now we need to keep telling them time and again that we will not forgive being lied to about our choices mattering and get that through their heads.

[Riddic]

What about the ending where they show the chest plate take a breath? Wonder if this will be explained or DLC content for down the road.

[legionaireshen]

So they really like starchild's logic and normandy crash

and OFFER EXPIRES APRIL 12, 2014.

so after two years new players have to pay for it?

[Zan_Vaelius]

Sesshaku wrote...

dheer wrote...

pants witch wrote...

shnellegaming wrote...
Why couldn't the official announcement have been from Bioware and not EA?

I WILL DIRECT THIS PERSONALLY

Well played.

Well played indeed 

Yup
DIRECT INTERVENTION IS NECESSARY



Damn they could make a DLC with Harbringer possessing enemies. I miss that...

[Relwyn]

Baihu1983 wrote...

So they wont be adding all the cut content back to the final mission? Just extra scenes?

From what we can tell right now: yes.

PAX will shed more light on the situation...maybe.

[1490]

Spartan_472 wrote...

You may all do as you see fit, but I will not be moved by this conveniently placed carrot of information.  I find it very...unique...that this tidbit of information should be unveiled merely a day before PAX and a day after The Consumerists' EA award.  That thought aside, all the announcement boils down to is an official admission of providing free DLC later this summer.  This unplanned DLC will further clarify the ending by providing further information through the usage of additional cut-scenes and cinematics.  At the same time, it will Bioware's artistic vision to remain intact.

Nothing has changed.  The line set between EA/Bioware and its consumers remains the same.  We have only been given more time for speculation.  I remain cautiously optimistic.

-Always Hope

I think their reason for doing this was to avoid a riot at PAX.  They didn't want to announce this at PAX and potentially get universally booed and forced off stage.  It gives fans a chance to get angry and then cool down before they go to the convention, so it might not be a COMPLETE disaster for them.

[Jadebaby]

Does this mean Starchild is staying?

[Tairram]

After the release i will say what i think. Until there i am afraid. Lets see pax and until the dlc....

[TheRealMithril]

Relwyn wrote...

TheRealMithril wrote...

We haven't won anything as the ending won't be changed. And unless they actually continue the game later where Shepard wakes up in the rubble (or some time there after) this ending will be as bad as ever. .. I smell pride.

The problem is also if they'd pick up the story again in a future DLC/4th game (unlikely) - one has to ask oneself the question:

how many times can you kill the hero and resurrect him before it becomes incredibly lame? As fpr this announcement, I am serioulsy not holding my breath with this. Extended cut...I'm not sure if Bioware is aware of this but they're in the gaming industry, not the movie industry. 

I understand your point, what what I am really after here is a final comprehensible sacrifice. I have no problem with him waking up in the rubble, only to immediately die, and his friends continuing the fight. Anything that removes the nonsensical mushroom trip out of the picture is good.

[TODD9999]

Well, it's not what I'd've wanted to hear in my personal perfect world, but who knows. It may be enough. They've bought themselves a few months of me continuing to care, at least.

[sfam]

Relwyn wrote...

Using artistic integrity as an excuse is bull**** when it comes to selling products, because in the end: art does not earn you big droves of cash (especially bad art), well designed products do.

Worse than that, its just really bad art.  Like, the ending flat out doesn't fit with the rest of the story.  The radically narrative shift feels totally tacked on.  Standing behind their right to produce really crappy art for the sake of losing massive amounts of revenue is just a bizarre position to take.

[logan23tom78]

I believe we need somone at PAX to ask ME3 panel questions like..
Will there be more gameplay or extra dialogue choices, will there be new ending added including the Reapers win option or argue with star kid,

There are to many unknowns...

Hold the Line!

[Animositisomina]

Tamcia wrote...

rofl
Extended cut - 5 mins of horror turned into 15 mins of horror. Skeptical about this....

[Trikormadenadon]

Bottom line remains still, don't buy any DLC until the endings are "clarified". Than make your judgement after seeing the "clarifications". That way at least if it is a ploy to get us to buy DLC before the clarification, it won't have worked. And if it isn't total bunk then can always go back and buy the already released dlc.

[Velocithon]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Does this mean Starchild is staying?

It means everything is staying.

In other words "We like our poop so much we aren't going to flush it down the toilet. We're just going to put a Glade room freshner near it and it will ALL BE BETTER"

Modifié par Velocithon, 05 avril 2012 - 03:33 .

[Jedifan421]

LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE! But seriously, I think it's hilarious how BioWare still doesn't understand why most people realize the ending is horrendous and instead see an opportunity to pander, something this DLC is going to have a lot of.

Does anyone remember this article?
http://www.gamefront...n-get-it-right/

Modifié par Jedifan421, 05 avril 2012 - 03:34 .

[Jadebaby]

1490 wrote...

Spartan_472 wrote...

You may all do as you see fit, but I will not be moved by this conveniently placed carrot of information.  I find it very...unique...that this tidbit of information should be unveiled merely a day before PAX and a day after The Consumerists' EA award.  That thought aside, all the announcement boils down to is an official admission of providing free DLC later this summer.  This unplanned DLC will further clarify the ending by providing further information through the usage of additional cut-scenes and cinematics.  At the same time, it will Bioware's artistic vision to remain intact.

Nothing has changed.  The line set between EA/Bioware and its consumers remains the same.  We have only been given more time for speculation.  I remain cautiously optimistic.

-Always Hope

I think their reason for doing this was to avoid a riot at PAX.  They didn't want to announce this at PAX and potentially get universally booed and forced off stage.  It gives fans a chance to get angry and then cool down before they go to the convention, so it might not be a COMPLETE disaster for them.

Agreed. Especially the nutcase ones that make the movement look bad. I'd thank them but....

[Taritu]

Well, it's free, so I'll download it, but clarity on a bad ending: doubt it's gonna work. Polishing a turd rarely does. Still, hope I'm wrong.

[Drxx]

So shep dies anyway, his LI just move on with other penis/vagina, and we will get static s*it about how krogans went riot after events of me3?

Now i see that old ending was better.

[Versidious]

killnoob wrote...

i don't want to sound cynical, but it will probably just be another colourful explosion...

If it's a colourful explosion that lets my Shepards settle down with his/her love interest, then I'll feel a bit better. It'll still be a ****, ****, ****ing **** ending, but at least it won't also be a ****ing miserable one.

Bloody hell, I'm swearing. I think I might be having emotions.   :-/

[happy_diplomat]

I am not buying anything EA/Bioware until I see the DLC, and if they try to legitimize the ending by adding extra scenes and an epilogue, then I will be rage quitting