Sangheili_1337 wrote...
Kolotosa wrote...
makenzieshepard wrote...
Ok tweet confirmed. I don't know what to think about it:
I just...This is... my resolve... :3
I have something in my eye! *scurries off*
Technically Shepard reunited with the squad is possible with current destroy ending. Dont fall for the PR speak.
Modifié par Kolotosa, 05 avril 2012 - 06:18 .
makenzieshepard wrote...
Ok tweet confirmed. I don't know what to think about it:
jlmaclachlan wrote...
NO BS starchild!!!!
Kolotosa wrote...
makenzieshepard wrote...
Ok tweet confirmed. I don't know what to think about it:
I just...This is... my resolve... :3
I have something in my eye! *scurries off*
Modifié par xtaru3433, 05 avril 2012 - 06:20 .
Keldon Northwind wrote...
A golden ending is not a good ending if EDI and the Geth have to die for it. It's just as bad as the current ones.
Modifié par Unit-Alpha, 05 avril 2012 - 06:22 .
thejarofdirt882 wrote...
Clarity... What I'd like Bioware to clarify is why they are so in love with this ending and just where the hell it/starchild came from. No hiding behind artisitc integrity or 240,000,000 perfect scores. I'd quite liketo know the thought process behind starchild's sudden appearance (even as a very amateur writer - as in I do it for my own pleasure and my eyes only atm - I know how poor on a story telling scale it is to introduce something so huge at the eleventh hour unless there is an extremely good explanation for it.)
The statement doesn't give me much hope, but i can wait until the summer before deciding if I will be buying another Bioware game.
Modifié par The_XBL_Nihilus, 05 avril 2012 - 06:22 .
Keldon Northwind wrote...
A golden ending is not a good ending if EDI and the Geth have to die for it. It's just as bad as the current ones.
Modifié par Aramintai, 05 avril 2012 - 06:24 .
I don't really know what to make of that?HairyMadDog1010 wrote...
Make of this what you will twitter.com/#!/MrBlazenGlazen/status/187948439148052480
Daedalus1773 wrote...
Aquilas wrote...
The blog Q&A is more about pride than artistic integrity. It's about pride. Lots and lots of pride. Casey Hudson and Mac Walters are so ego-involved in the ending they created they simply will not acknowledge that they failed. They failed as writers, they failed as artists, they failed as stewards of the Mass Effect universe.
Remember, fans, we wield the ultimate weapon--money. They need us--we choose them. If you really want to be heard, loudly and clearly, then don't spend another thin dime on any EA or BioWare game. Don't spend a single dime on any project Casey Hudson and Mac Walters work on. Then you truly will have the final say.
QFT
Versidious wrote...
I think that Bioware have confused 'artistic vision' with 'creative vision', and use 'artistic vision' because there is a common misconception that art is somehow sacrosanct (Usually amongst pseudo-intellectuals who want to avoid criticism). With art, you are attempting to convey or express something, whether it be a feeling, a character, or a philosophy. So, what exactly was Casey Hudson attempting to communicate at the end? If it was that the conflict between synthetics and man was inevitable, then he has failed - it was disproved earlier in the game. If it was that it wasn't inevitable, then he has failed - the fact that the main character dies to support it crushes this intention. If it's that synthesis is the only solution... Again, he has failed, as the points made by the Geth throughout ME3 and ME2 - that we have nothing they want or need, and would rather be left alone - disprove this. The fact that your character must die in the name of a disproved philosophy is not artistic, it's just stupid. Unless of course I've misunderstood, and what Mr Hudson *really* wanted to convey was that life's a **** and then you die. In which case, job well done, and screw you.
Retour en haut