Amioran wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
Is English your first language? I'm having a really hard time understanding what you're trying to say.
No, it's not. I'm sorry if it is diffuclt to understand what I'm saying.
But to summarize: the "trilogy" part is just a convention, nothing more, now. It is not said that just because Bioware said at beginning that ME would have been a trilogy that trilogy was tied to the full saga in itself (and not maybe to a character in the same). Or it could also have been at beginning, but then the thing could have changed in the course of action for many motives (one of which is naturally also money, without hypocrisies).
Let's pretend that Bioware instead of saying "trilogy" at the beginning would have said that ME was made of 5 chapters. Would you still be angry at this "ending"?
If no then there's not motive to be angry the same, just because they told you now, clearly, that this is not the ending at all.
I think we're talking about two different things. You think I'm saying that since Shepard is dead(for most players) that the entire franchise is done. What I'm saying is that Mass Effect 3 is the end of the franchise as we know it. Shepard was our protagonist and the entire purpose of the story was stopping the Reapers and protecting the galaxy. The end of Mass Effect 3 is the end of the trilogy, and the end of the trilogy is the end of the entire story we're been presented with. Whether or not the series will continue with a new protagonist and a new story is irrelevent to discussions about the end of Mass Effect 3. It's the end of the trilogy and a satisfactory and sensical ending is to be expected. Mass Effect wasn't presented as a quintilogy, it was and is a trilogy.





Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Retour en haut




