546 réponses à ce sujet

[Phobius9]

Well, well, well. Verrrry interesting....

[Fat Headed Wolf]

Valentia X wrote...

If reunification requires me to commit genocide... then I guess I'm going to die. Killing off a sentient species, organic or synthetic, is a massive no-no for me.


I guess it doesn't matter. I got vapourised in the blue ending; they only they can reunite with is my ashes, I guess.

No kidding. Truly renegade to kill umpteen amount of souls simply to see your friends again. 

On topic, Op, got a link to this tweeters you got? I trust you like I trust everyone on the web, but you can never be too careful. 

[Stygian1]

This cheered me up actually... a little.

[yahtzo]

if #2 is true then I will be satisfied.

If the DLC still involves everyone dying an overplayed grim dark death then forget it.

[MJF JD]

can we not take everything a community manager says to heart again. She is just encouraging speculation she does not have or release hard facts about the content. People keep taking what she says to heart and then get angry when she points out that she is just talking as a fan.

[rma2110]

I'm more interested in what happens after control. Can I free the Reapers so they can take bloody vengeance on the Catalyst that controls them? No?

Seriously, I am interested in what happens after control.

[crimsontotem]

what about reunion? I want to build home with Tali GODDAMIT

[Orthodox Infidel]

Are you sure about this? She has said in the past that she doesn't know anything the rest of us don't and most of what she says on her Twitter is her own personal speculation.

[Rockpopple]

I thought you were about to send us all on some delivery mission that would end up killing all of us.

Thank goodness it was actual good news.

[Laurencio]

People should stop assuming that "clarification" is bad. I bet we will get an extensive cinematic giving us a lot of closure (well not a lot, but you know... some).

Modifié par Laurencio, 05 avril 2012 - 06:02 .

[SuperVulcan]

Now this! This is good!

[Wikkr]

Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...

 I know for many that an extended ending cut won't be enough. But I just talked with Merizan over twitter. She told me that:

1- No one starves to death, somehow.

and 

2- No ending will be perfect, there will be some sacrifices. But it is possible to have shepard reunite with normandy and crew.

Of course, we'll just have to wait and see what this extended cut actually shows us. But if this is accurate, then I think I'll be just fine with this. Not really the best ending due to...well. Plot holes and star child. But I'll be okay if this is the possible outcome of said endings.

I can't really post the link to the tweets since my google chrome is being stupid. But I'm sure if you look you'll find out discussion. It's fairly recent. 

So a ravaged earth manages to support tens of thousands of ships with their crews,
the normandy crew manage to find food for all the different races they had onboard when they crashed,
Shep manages to survive reentry after the citadel explodes with his/her armor already burned half to hell,

[Rickin10]

This is great!!! I mean it's not like they've lied to us before is it?

[Bantz]

Torrible wrote...

Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...

 I know for many that an extended ending cut won't be enough. But I just talked with Merizan over twitter. She told me that:

1- No one starves to death, somehow.

Puts to rest the 'mass relays blown = entire galaxy dead' theory.

that is something they HAVE to explain though. If you watch the galaxy map you see a shockwave go from each of the relays. The only basis we have is from The Arrival where that shockwave destroyed every living thing in the system.

also it could be they do'nt starve because they all got zaped by the relay explosion 

Modifié par Bantz, 05 avril 2012 - 06:02 .

[The Exiled Paladin]

Thank god for Jessica Merizan, her comments give me hope

[crimzontearz]

uh...WHAT ABOUT THE SECOND PART??

[hoodie_gypsy]

This actually makes me feel better.

[Taboo]

I figure that the clarification will encompass a wide range of possibilities and that that has been spread to all the Bioware employees.

[trey40]

Bantz wrote...

if they remove destroying the geth from destroy ending and let me reunite with my crew I would accept that ending and be ok with it.

well what i thought about...
the geht have their consensus, they are software uploaded in hardware to work right? and the hardware is synthetic. so in the detroy ending only their hardware (their bodies) get destroyed, but not their minds (software), same goes for EDI was she is housed in the normandy AI core. 

or am i completely wrong with that?

[AlienSpaceBats]

Thanks for posting.
Now reserving judgement until I see the extended cut.

[DESTRAUDO]

Just check her twitter.

https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan

People blew the endings way way way out of proportion. Everyone assumed they would all starve for no reason. Everyone assumed the relays could not be rebuilt for no reason. Everyone assumed the normandy crew were stranded forever for no reason. Tons of people assumed the waves were destructive when shown the opposite was true.

[Torrible]

Laurencio wrote...

People should stop assuming that "clarification" is bad. I bet we will get an extensive cinematic giving us a lot of closure (well not a lot, but you know... some).

Yeah, and people should stop arguing from ignorance. Just because they cannot imagine how the ending can be improved upon doesn't mean it can't be.

[Taboo]

Bantz wrote...

if they remove destroying the geth from destroy ending and let me reunite with my crew I would accept that ending and be ok with it.

[Thrawn81]

crimzontearz wrote...

uh...WHAT ABOUT THE SECOND PART??

ive only got the first part and iam not the OP bro!

[Fail_Inc]

Thrawn81 wrote...

Good one Thrawn81

I'll quote this incase someone missed it.

Damn you Merizan, you're giving me hope again