Immz wrote...
LinksOcarina wrote...
Immz wrote...
That was nice? Your first post was sarcastic and condescending towards me. Don't make yourself out to be an innocent bystander. I was every bit as rude to you as you were to me.
Nice try though.
Edited my post for clarification.
But frankly, i'm sick of arguing at this point.
If you want to be civil let me know, then well talk brass tacks on why I feel you are wrong.
I'm astonished.
You come into my thread.
You speak down to me. You're sarcastic, rude, and condescending, all in your first post.
I respond similarly, and you tell me you were being nice, and trying to be civil?
This is a joke.
You did read my other responses right?
Cause after being sarcastic for one post, you think i'm sarcastic in all of them.
Here is the problems with what you posted.
1) you presume everyone is on your side on this and you are doing them a service in warning them, condesdending in the beginning.
2) your main point, that they said wait and see on things you found offensive, is subjective. The problem is that most of those changes put forth as they said wait and see were fixed to the degree it would placate some users.
But what it seems like, is that you are taking this for a factual problem, which is simply not the case.
3) A majority of the post was just pure bashing and made for a singular purpose. To encite people. You gave three examples that are subjective and put it forth as fact, then make a call to arms for a cause. So it seems to work real well, since it got people to read your thread.