Why the Hate on the Phaeston?
#26
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:19
#27
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:20
Brymfyre wrote...
I don't care how good or bad it is, it sounds awesome!
and I play turian a lot so it goes with the character:)
#28
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:20
i use my AR as a backup weapon to my pistol in SP.
the paladin is awesome. i rarely dont use it.
#29
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:21
ttchip wrote...
The bottom line is: The Avenger is about as good as the Phaeston while weighing way less and being less rare.
Avenger has much higher recoil than the Phaeston. And yes, it's very noticable.
I tired a game with it after I got the Phaeston, and wow (was using Mattock before, I know I was kind of stupid). Useless for long range, bad at mid range. Even with the +55% stability from Turian Veteran and Marksman active. The only way the Avenger is good is with an Assault Rifle Stability Damper, but if you take even 2 points in Turian Veteran... your stability would be over 100%, and it starts to drag your reticle down (instead of up, with normal recoil). Until they fix that bug... I'll be sticking with my Phaeston w/ Clip + Piercing mods.
Modifié par KelbornX, 05 avril 2012 - 11:22 .
#30
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:22
The Spamming Troll wrote...
the GPS sucks. all the full auto weapons suck. its a shame i cant get a full auto mattock or saber. theres no such thing, or what?
i use my AR as a backup weapon to my pistol in SP.
the paladin is awesome. i rarely dont use it.
Go get a controller or mouse with an auto feature and then all semi-autos become full autos if you want them to be.
#31
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:23
For some reason, the Phaeston works admirably when firing *bursts*. Try something between 5-10 rounds and it can diss out tons more damage than just spraying the target top to bottom. I love the weapon, and even though I can't say it's top choice (especially for gold matches), bursts from the Phaeston work a lot better.
#32
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:26
Lybra wrote...
Someone had mentioned something in a similar thread that nobody took seriously:
For some reason, the Phaeston works admirably when firing *bursts*. Try something between 5-10 rounds and it can diss out tons more damage than just spraying the target top to bottom. I love the weapon, and even though I can't say it's top choice (especially for gold matches), bursts from the Phaeston work a lot better.
Burst fire with a gun that does piddly damage even in full auto? Yeah okay...
#33
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:28
Phaeston is under-rated by most and over rated by some. You will be the later.
Phaeston is a decent weapon, it's very rounded out and have good stopping power. The stopping power is probably the only thing going for it over Temples, as Temples out preform Phaeston in every other way in the hands of a good player that can control a weapon well.
Being a AR, Phaeston has access to armor piercing, which is what Temples lack. This means you do not need to wear a side arm with Phaeston, where as you need an Anti armor weapon with Temples.
So why is it under rated by most? becuase most ppl do not know how to aim for the head, which is what is required to shin as an AR user. So most ppl have bad experience pting with ppl using Phaeston.
Also, wearing a side arm with Phaeston is a bad idea, for the reason above. You are just grimming your cool down. Most AR are already very rounded so you only need to bring 1 weapon. This is probably the reason why you got kicked. I often use Phaeston with no problem
My score with Phaeston is often the top 2, or in case all 4 players have similar marks. It all depence on how you use it.
That said, it really is a Turian weapon. if you are a human soldier, I'd suggest using Vinc or Mott
Modifié par realgundam, 05 avril 2012 - 11:32 .
#34
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:29
I just checked it on good ol' soldier-Shep. Both weapons have their fair share of recoil with the Avenger seeming to have slightly more. None of them require turian stability or recoil dampeners in order to be managable - at least for me (in contrast to the Revenant, for example).KelbornX wrote...
Avenger has much higher recoil than the Phaeston. And yes, it's very noticable.ttchip wrote...
The bottom line is: The Avenger is about as good as the Phaeston while weighing way less and being less rare.
I tired a game with it after I got the Phaeston, and wow (was using Mattock before, I know I was kind of stupid). Useless for long range, bad at mid range. Even with the +55% stability from Turian Veteran and Marksman active. The only way the Avenger is good is with an Assault Rifle Stability Damper, but if you take even 2 points in Turian Veteran... your stability would be over 100%, and it starts to drag your reticle down (instead of up, with normal recoil). Until they fix that bug... I'll be sticking with my Phaeston w/ Clip + Piercing mods.
#35
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:30
#36
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:31
Atheosis wrote...
Lybra wrote...
Someone had mentioned something in a similar thread that nobody took seriously:
For some reason, the Phaeston works admirably when firing *bursts*. Try something between 5-10 rounds and it can diss out tons more damage than just spraying the target top to bottom. I love the weapon, and even though I can't say it's top choice (especially for gold matches), bursts from the Phaeston work a lot better.
Burst fire with a gun that does piddly damage even in full auto? Yeah okay...
I'm saying, it works better in bursts than it does when hosing a target continuously. I'm uncertain why it is so, but I've tried it numerous times and it seems to be the case.
You could correct me in this, however you seem to know better already...
#37
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:32
I think it's better suited for a engineer or adept. I have used it with my Quarian Engineer and it wasn't too bad when i ranked 2nd in bronze and kill Atlases with it.
#38
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:33
#39
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:38
#40
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:41
#41
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:42
realgundam wrote...
Let's put it this way,
Phaeston is under-rated by most and over rated by some. You will be the later.
Phaeston is a decent weapon, it's very rounded out and have good stopping power. The stopping power is probably the only thing going for it over Temples, as Temples out preform Phaeston in every other way in the hands of a good player that can control a weapon well.
Being a AR, Phaeston has access to armor piercing, which is what Temples lack. This means you do not need to wear a side arm with Phaeston, where as you need an Anti armor weapon with Temples.
So why is it under rated by most? becuase most ppl do not know how to aim for the head, which is what is required to shin as an AR user. So most ppl have bad experience pting with ppl using Phaeston.
Also, wearing a side arm with Phaeston is a bad idea, for the reason above. You are just grimming your cool down. Most AR are already very rounded so you only need to bring 1 weapon. This is probably the reason why you got kicked. I often use Phaeston with no problem
My score with Phaeston is often the top 2, or in case all 4 players have similar marks. It all depence on how you use it.
That said, it really is a Turian weapon. if you are a human soldier, I'd suggest using Vinc or Mott
Err...Temples?
Oh and I aim for the head with all guns that benefit from it, and the Phaeston still sucks. Probably because I aim for the head with the better guns as well...
#42
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:43
#43
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:44
Lybra wrote...
Atheosis wrote...
Lybra wrote...
Someone had mentioned something in a similar thread that nobody took seriously:
For some reason, the Phaeston works admirably when firing *bursts*. Try something between 5-10 rounds and it can diss out tons more damage than just spraying the target top to bottom. I love the weapon, and even though I can't say it's top choice (especially for gold matches), bursts from the Phaeston work a lot better.
Burst fire with a gun that does piddly damage even in full auto? Yeah okay...
I'm saying, it works better in bursts than it does when hosing a target continuously. I'm uncertain why it is so, but I've tried it numerous times and it seems to be the case.
You could correct me in this, however you seem to know better already...
I'm going to guess it's because you can land more headshots with it, but if you are using it as a burst fire gun, the Vindicator is a hundred times better.
#44
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:44
Modifié par FFLB, 05 avril 2012 - 11:45 .
#45
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:57
The Revenant is slightly better than the Phaeston again with a slightly higher damage per bullet, but at the cost of even more weaight and a heavier recoil.
For a full-automatic, I'd personally actually prefer the Phaeston over the Revenant because of the lower recoil and higher accuracy.
Semi-automatics are simply a different type of weapons. They're also called assault rifles, but they work differently. So to me, there's little point to making comparisons.
Same with the three-round burst Vindicator. It works different, so there's no comparison to me. There's no point comparing them even.
The only thing that's an issue I think, is that AR's overall aren't too great for silver/gold games. They're just not ideal against armored enemies. Snipers, biotics and tech are simply way better against armor than even an AR with an AP mod is. Armor is really the weakness of ARs, and there's lots of armor running around on silver and gold games.
#46
Posté 05 avril 2012 - 11:57
#47
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 12:03
Modifié par Sabresandiego, 06 avril 2012 - 12:03 .
#48
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 12:11
Still need ammo power, though. I recommend warp because it adds even more armor bypass (25/35/50%) but most people think it's trash and use ap ammo already.
#49
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 12:13
SMGAtheosis wrote...
realgundam wrote...
Let's put it this way,
Phaeston is under-rated by most and over rated by some. You will be the later.
Phaeston is a decent weapon, it's very rounded out and have good stopping power. The stopping power is probably the only thing going for it over Temples, as Temples out preform Phaeston in every other way in the hands of a good player that can control a weapon well.
Being a AR, Phaeston has access to armor piercing, which is what Temples lack. This means you do not need to wear a side arm with Phaeston, where as you need an Anti armor weapon with Temples.
So why is it under rated by most? becuase most ppl do not know how to aim for the head, which is what is required to shin as an AR user. So most ppl have bad experience pting with ppl using Phaeston.
Also, wearing a side arm with Phaeston is a bad idea, for the reason above. You are just grimming your cool down. Most AR are already very rounded so you only need to bring 1 weapon. This is probably the reason why you got kicked. I often use Phaeston with no problem
My score with Phaeston is often the top 2, or in case all 4 players have similar marks. It all depence on how you use it.
That said, it really is a Turian weapon. if you are a human soldier, I'd suggest using Vinc or Mott
Err...Temples?
Oh and I aim for the head with all guns that benefit from it, and the Phaeston still sucks. Probably because I aim for the head with the better guns as well...
Full auto fire weapon is best used on Turian only. much more effective that way, very easly HS at long range consistently even in full auto result in effective dps.
If you can't drop a Murada on Gold within seconds with Phaeston on a Turian, you are doing something wrong
Of couse, again not to say it is the best weapon. It is just decent. If you are good with Geth Shotgun, I'd go for that
Modifié par realgundam, 06 avril 2012 - 12:17 .
#50
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 12:18
Granted there are semi automatic weapons that do more damage, but I don't enjoy spamming the trigger. I think most people should try a Phaeston X on a Turian sentinel before dismissing it completely. It's a perfect fit, though admittedly not well suited for most classes and builds.
[edit]
Forgot to mention that I equip disruptor ammo for gold Geth runs and it's pretty amazing synergy with Overload and Energy Drain. Tech bursts are even more awesome now after their recent buff.
Modifié par HEEGZ, 06 avril 2012 - 12:19 .





Retour en haut






