Persephone wrote...
No need.
Besides, I don't think IT is completely out of the question.
What he said ^^
I apologize (to all who believed in me and IT)
Débuté par
Tiax Rules All
, avril 05 2012 11:31
#401
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:21
lofte_2000
-
- Members
- 318 messages
What he said ^^
Retour en haut
#402
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:22
Atraiyu Wrynn
-
- Members
- 415 messages
Thank you sir. I understand not believing Bioware could be so far off base with the ending. The first few hours of beating the game for most of us was just a mess of denial and confusion.
#403
Guest_PurebredCorn_*
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:28
Guest_PurebredCorn_*
Guest_PurebredCorn_*
-
- Guests
Tiax Rules All wrote...
also even if im wrong and this was not the intended message at all, I PERSONALLY will believe this is what happened as it makes more sense then face value ending. less plot holes and a more satifying outcome. I was a little angry and confused at first too until this came to light. Now I am at peace with the ending.
So what happened to this, Tiax.
Just because Bioware doesn't come out with a statement that ends with "Tiax REALLY DOES rule all!" you're going to abandon IT, just to be safe. Man, you are no different from all the other whiners on BSN that start crying whenever they don't get WHAT they want WHEN they want it. Get over yourself.
I like that the ending as it stands is open to interpretation. I don't really understand why people are so averse to different interpretations to the ending of a GAME. I personally like the thought of indoctrination theory, it's the only idea that explains everything nicely. I will be very surprised if it turns out to be true or if we ever get a definitive confirmation, but nothing that Bioware has released so far has confirmed of denied the theory.
#404
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:32
Shepard Wins
-
- Members
- 1 359 messages
I watched an IT video on youtube today and found out I still believe in the Theory! A bit about a wound in Shepard's side (after he shot Anderson in that side) is especially convincing.
So I'll say it again, don't beat yourself up, Tiax. The theory is solid and well made. Even if it proves to be wrong in the end, it doesn't lessen its merit.
So I'll say it again, don't beat yourself up, Tiax. The theory is solid and well made. Even if it proves to be wrong in the end, it doesn't lessen its merit.
#405
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:34
naddaya
-
- Members
- 991 messages
Descy_ wrote...
Abraham_uk wrote...
DEMIKLY wrote...
<blah blah text>
I like the relays being reconstructed.. and I like the Shepard surviving (the breath was definiately Shepard then..) so I put this to you.. if Shepard survives the destroy ending, how the heck could he in any way be alive without IT?
No space suit.. no Lazauras project.. Maybe they are going to just show Shepard using the crucible as intended after he wakes up.. ?
How is Shepard still alive? Well if he was teleported to the Citadel, then maybe he was teleported back to Earth. He could not have fallen from the sky.
He would have had to go ALL the way back to the beam on the citadel + the fact that he was in the primary explosion.
Shepard passed out. There's no way he could have moved before that point, he breathed again for the first time when waking up. There must be more to it *desperate look*.
reeot wrote...
m_k wrote...
Yes. The IT is still the only option that makes sense. I still believe it and will reserve judgement until the DLC is out.
I disagree.
Ain't this the right time to get involved into the DLC development as a community?
I admit... First we need more informations about BioWares Plans, but we shouldn't just lean back and wait till release.
This will be our last chance to give the Mass Effect franchise the ending it deserves.
And the IT is still our best way to do so.
To all who like the "Indoctrination Theory":
Don't stop voicing your opinion.
Would more complaining accomplish anything? The forums are a mess, people keep on bashing each other and Bioware probably already has a plan for the DLC. If they ignore the IT, they'll miss a great opportunity. But if they didn't already plan on including it, I don't see it happening now.
Modifié par m_k, 06 avril 2012 - 03:41 .
#406
Posté 06 avril 2012 - 03:37
Fulgrim88
-
- Members
- 1 585 messages
I was among those telling Indoc people that they were in for some disappointment.
Being right never felt so wrong
Being right never felt so wrong
#408
Posté 07 avril 2012 - 01:29
Valorefane Dragonwinter
-
- Members
- 346 messages
#409
Posté 07 avril 2012 - 01:36
Zork90
-
- Members
- 173 messages
There shouldn't be anything to apologize for. The T part in IT stands for theory, thats what it always has been.
But to me, IT is not disproven!!! It can still be a resolution that is similar to what we thought was true in the IT.
At PAX they did not confirm IT, but neither did they deny it. They dodged the question, and why would they do that when they simply could put us out of our misery with a simple NO?
Its either:
1) They dodged that question because they dont want to talk too much about the ending, simply because they might spoil the ending DLC(which potentially would explain something similar to IT). Small chance, but none the less, a chance.
2) Why not give a PR answer and not a definite one. It'll keep us fans running, we'll keep on discussin if it is in fact IT or not? Maybe come up with other theories. Add on the hype etc.
This is what they said:
"We don't want to comment either way...We want the content to speak for itself, and we'll let it do so."
To me personally, the content speaks for itself, its clear. Im not 100% sure, how could I be? But IT is not denied or disproven.
Anyway @ OP, nice of you to admit something like that, but you're entitled to have your opinion and ideas. No one was ever forced to like it or believe it.
But to me, IT is not disproven!!! It can still be a resolution that is similar to what we thought was true in the IT.
At PAX they did not confirm IT, but neither did they deny it. They dodged the question, and why would they do that when they simply could put us out of our misery with a simple NO?
Its either:
1) They dodged that question because they dont want to talk too much about the ending, simply because they might spoil the ending DLC(which potentially would explain something similar to IT). Small chance, but none the less, a chance.
2) Why not give a PR answer and not a definite one. It'll keep us fans running, we'll keep on discussin if it is in fact IT or not? Maybe come up with other theories. Add on the hype etc.
This is what they said:
"We don't want to comment either way...We want the content to speak for itself, and we'll let it do so."
To me personally, the content speaks for itself, its clear. Im not 100% sure, how could I be? But IT is not denied or disproven.
Anyway @ OP, nice of you to admit something like that, but you're entitled to have your opinion and ideas. No one was ever forced to like it or believe it.
Modifié par Zork90, 07 avril 2012 - 01:40 .
