Navasha wrote...
You people have a strange notion of law and advertising. When a company says, "We know you will love our product"... and then you don't. That is NOT false advertising.
That's correct. However, that's not the statement Bioware made. They promised endings that were not going to be like the TV show Lost...customers would not be left with more questions than answers. Plots would be resolved. It was advertised as the conclusion to the Mass Effect trilogy. In reality, the ending left so many questions unanswered, and asked a ton of questions in the last 10 minutes that were never in the series. It copletely failed to live up to the pre-release claim that Bioware made.
I returned my copy, opened, to Amazon for a full refund. In addition to the ending, I felt that Bioware's promise that single player only play could access all ending content was broken. Over a month after release, the best official response Bioware can offer is a single "It can be done" reply, which was later edited to state "you can get the best ending just using single-player." The question has been asked numerous times...directly by me, amongst others...and seemingly the closest Bioware will come to addressing the issue is to have other customers post alleged messages from a Bioware tech claiming that it's possible. This isn't a story issue that discussing would spoil some element of the game for potential players. Bioware, among the many mistakes they have made, declined to issue any kind of corrective statement on this charge. How difficult would it be for them to simply state how many total War Assets are available in the game? It would have gone a long way to quiet many of these claims. And while their near silence on the matter is not an admission of guilt, when you have customers returning their opened games for a full refund, it certainly is very supportive of the claim.
Retour en haut
