205 réponses à ce sujet

[kbct]

OutlawTorn6806 wrote...

Yeah. They are giving us more of what we didn't like. Brilliant.

Yup. Of course, you have HOLD THE DIME:

http://social.biowar.../index/11036313

And some people might want to prove the DLC is not the answer:

http://social.biowar...11/polls/31441/

[Lucie_J24]

Isn't this thread supposed to be for those who LIKED the ending to express themselves and their opinion on the why ?
Why is that then that when just anyone dare to say their opinion and that they actually didn't hate the ending, and that they don't feel the need to hate Bioware, they are insulted.
Damnit, people, you have your (multiples) other threads where you can spill your hate and your anger.
So please, just let us this one, where we can say that we didn't hate the ending, whitout calling us idiots.

We are entitled to our opinions. Please respect that.

[TheShogunOfHarlem]

Bcoolpro wrote...

TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...

Honestly... I fail to see what's to like about the ending at all. At best it was anti-climactic and at worst it was contrived to say the least. That's why the defenders confound me. The ending in some respects reminded me of Star Trek V's ending in a sense. There's a huge buildup that is destroyed by an anti-climax. 

If all the Crucible did was blow up the Reapers then how is that less anti-climactic?  100+ hours of gameplay all leading up to Shepard pressing a button?

I think it's time to clarify my point in saying that the ending was anti-climactic. Since ME1, the Reaper's motives for exterminating advanced cultures was a mystery. (As were their Origins) Finding out the how and the why of the Reepers was the anti-climactic moment I was referring to. Everything from there falls into place: The Crucible, ending the Reaper's cycle and Shepard's death. If anything, the only Climax was the destruction of the Relay. network. (but even then there are unresolved issues)

As for the happy ending projection that gets thrown at those that are unsatisfied with the ending. Knock it off! I honestly wouldn't mind a myriad of from "Happy" to EPIC FAIL sad endings. Plain and simple the ending didn't work with me. Shepard Dying again by default just annoyed me. Not because it happend but because it happend twice. I wouldn't mind a meaningful death if it didn't happen before and wasn't the focus of ME2.

[78stonewobble]

One thing that annoys me the more I think about it.

Red ending means destroying EDI and the geth.

Hmm what?

So this particular space magic EMP destroys:

Reaper mechanical biological species built millions of years ago by an unknown race.
Geth mechanical (maybe biological) species built by the quarians 300 plus years ago.
EDI mechanical (mostly I think) species built by humans xx years ago.

Convenient and not the least bit forced that it destroys all 3...

If you wanted bittersweet genocidal ending it should have been "peace agreement reapers retreat if you yourself (the galaxy's organics) wipe out the geth and edi" or something.

[Erixxxx]

Lucie_J24 wrote...

Isn't this thread supposed to be for those who LIKED the ending to express themselves and their opinion on the why ?
Why is that then that when just anyone dare to say their opinion and that they actually didn't hate the ending, and that they don't feel the need to hate Bioware, they are insulted.
Damnit, people, you have your (multiples) other threads where you can spill your hate and your anger.
So please, just let us this one, where we can say that we didn't hate the ending, whitout calling us idiots.

We are entitled to our opinions. Please respect that.

Indeed. This is exactly why pro-enders end up leaving these forums, because they can't discuss things in peace.

[Bcoolpro]

TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...

Bcoolpro wrote...

TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...

Honestly... I fail to see what's to like about the ending at all. At best it was anti-climactic and at worst it was contrived to say the least. That's why the defenders confound me. The ending in some respects reminded me of Star Trek V's ending in a sense. There's a huge buildup that is destroyed by an anti-climax. 

If all the Crucible did was blow up the Reapers then how is that less anti-climactic?  100+ hours of gameplay all leading up to Shepard pressing a button?

I think it's time to clarify my point in saying that the ending was anti-climactic. Since ME1, the Reaper's motives for exterminating advanced cultures was a mystery. (As were their Origins) Finding out the how and the why of the Reepers was the anti-climactic moment I was referring to. Everything from there falls into place: The Crucible, ending the Reaper's cycle and Shepard's death. If anything, the only Climax was the destruction of the Relay. network. (but even then there are unresolved issues)

Thank you for clarifying.  I didn't find it anti-climatic but I understand where you are coming from...  

 As for the happy ending projection that gets thrown at those that are unsatisfied with the ending. Knock it off! I honestly wouldn't mind a myriad of from "Happy" to EPIC FAIL sad endings. Plain and simple the ending didn't work with me. Shepard Dying again by default just annoyed me. Not because it happend but because it happend twice. I wouldn't mind a meaningful death if it didn't happen before and wasn't the focus of ME2.

When Bioware said this was the end of Shepard's story and as sacrifice was a major theme through out I was kind of expecting that part.

Modifié par Bcoolpro, 07 avril 2012 - 10:23 .