335 réponses à ce sujet

[hand-o_death547]

I was really hoping for IT to be true, even if they didn't mean it to happen and it was just horrid writing.

[GBGriffin]

RADIUMEYEZ wrote...


So then not only are you an ignorant whelp but you give up on things easily. That's okay there are plenty of people out there that have that same problem I believe they live in boxes in alley ways and eat their own crap. Perhaps you will fit in nicely with them since you pretty much are already recycling the same mindless **** over and over again.

I love how you've thoroughly debased yourself with these posts. First, Sarah Palin. Then, telling me to go ******. Then, this gem.

Seriously, stay classy. You're doing nothing more than fueling my belief that the fringe element of the IT believers, into which you fall, are crazy.

[RADIUMEYEZ]

GBGriffin wrote...

RADIUMEYEZ wrote...
Now seriously just go ****** and go to bed before you cause yourself to lose even more intelligence.

Wait, really? You're asking me to leave using these words?

Priceless.

So you don't deny that you are sitting there with your dick in your hand dreaming of Richard Simmons naked in your bed covered in rose petals?

[GBGriffin]

RADIUMEYEZ wrote...


So you don't deny that you are sitting there with your dick in your hand dreaming of Richard Simmons naked in your bed covered in rose petals?

I deny it.

[RADIUMEYEZ]

GBGriffin wrote...

RADIUMEYEZ wrote...


So you don't deny that you are sitting there with your dick in your hand dreaming of Richard Simmons naked in your bed covered in rose petals?

I deny it.

No no it's too late for that now I have proof

[Armdin]

RADIUMEYEZ, you seriously are going too far.

[RADIUMEYEZ]

Armdin wrote...

RADIUMEYEZ, you seriously are going too far.

True but I am bored as hell

[Armdin]

RADIUMEYEZ wrote...

Armdin wrote...

RADIUMEYEZ, you seriously are going too far.

True but I am bored as hell

Me too, I'm struggling between staying here or going and finish reading Duma Key but these damn threads are gripping.

[AnsinJung]

AxholeRose wrote...

Indoc Theorists are people willing to give BioWare the benefit of doubt until they themselves make a confirming statement.

IT theorists are bigger fans of the game than you will ever be.

Agree with first sentence.

OP mentions that IT fans were called "committed" at PAX.

"committed" is a euphemism for insane
...
indoctrinated?

[Reth Shepherd]

As an IT-er, no, please don't feel sorry for me. Even if it turned out not to be Bioware!true, it is now my head-canon!true. I reject the ending as it stands, and I'd honestly been speculating about indoctrination before the game even came out. The large amounts of supporting evidence throughout the game, while not objectively correct, built a framework for me to create my own ME3 ending. So no, please don't feel sorry for me. I'm not!

[cotheer]

Yes.
Because they actually used their brains and logic, unlike SOMEONE.

[Zolt51]

GBGriffin wrote...

You should see the talk in the IT-related threads, then.

Some theorists are calling out the people who no longer believe in the IT as "fair-weather" or not TRUE believers, as if this was a test of faith.

Sad, scary, but, really, pretty hilarious.

Bahhh hahaaa ha ha haaa *snort*

You just can't make up stuff like that!

[Armdin]

AnsinJung wrote...

AxholeRose wrote...

Indoc Theorists are people willing to give BioWare the benefit of doubt until they themselves make a confirming statement.

IT theorists are bigger fans of the game than you will ever be.

Agree with first sentence.

OP mentions that IT fans were called "committed" at PAX.

"committed" is a euphemism for insane
...
indoctrinated?

I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

[Zolt51]

cotheer wrote...

Yes.
Because they actually used their brains and logic, unlike SOMEONE.

Oh YES, character attacks. Gimme moar!

[nullobject]

Reth Shepherd wrote...

As an IT-er, no, please don't feel sorry for me. Even if it turned out not to be Bioware!true, it is now my head-canon!true. I reject the ending as it stands, and I'd honestly been speculating about indoctrination before the game even came out. The large amounts of supporting evidence throughout the game, while not objectively correct, built a framework for me to create my own ME3 ending. So no, please don't feel sorry for me. I'm not!

I'm not really talking about people who subscribe just for head-canon purposes. 

I was talking about people who still think Bioware intended Indoctrination from the outset, and are still following their plan to eventually reveal the greatest twist ending in gaming history.

[GBGriffin]

Armdin wrote...


I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

It's a term often used when placing someone in a mental institution. Fortunately, this definition popped up within the first few Google results.

Modifié par GBGriffin, 07 avril 2012 - 01:25 .

[Zolt51]

Armdin wrote...

I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

Euphemism is the word you're looking for.

Euthanasy is when you kill someone who's too stupid to live. Personally I think it's a bit excessive.

@GBGriffin: Love your sig!

Modifié par Zolt51, 07 avril 2012 - 01:26 .

[Inujade]

Honestly? I'm head-canoning Indoctrination Theory. No matter what Bioware ends up deciding.

They can have their artistic integrity (and while I do think games are art, and that ME is art, I don't think artistic integrity should translate to: "I'm really hurt that you don't like my VISION! Its MY VISION and it is TOO SACRED TO CHANGE") but, since they have already said they consider their fans co-authors, I'm co-authoring it for my Shepard. She's been indoctrinated.

I'm pretty much at peace with that, though I remain optimistic about this extended cut thing.

[Jenonax]

Armdin wrote...

AnsinJung wrote...

AxholeRose wrote...

Indoc Theorists are people willing to give BioWare the benefit of doubt until they themselves make a confirming statement.

IT theorists are bigger fans of the game than you will ever be.

Agree with first sentence.

OP mentions that IT fans were called "committed" at PAX.

"committed" is a euphemism for insane
...
indoctrinated?

I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

It was the "um" before it.  You can almost hear the laughter of condescension.

[cotheer]

Zolt51 wrote...

cotheer wrote...

Yes.
Because they actually used their brains and logic, unlike SOMEONE.

Oh YES, character attacks. Gimme moar!

Sorry, but this wasn't directed at anti IT part of community, but BW.
So yeah.

[Armdin]

Zolt51 wrote...

Armdin wrote...

I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

Euphemism is the word you're looking for.

Euthanasy is when you kill someone who's too stupid to live. Personally I think it's a bit excessive.

Thanks for the correction~ That really tickled me for some reason!

[AcesRedd]

nullobject wrote...

After the game came out, they were like:

Bioware couldn't have written something this bad and meant it to be taken seriously, just wait a few weeks and the "real" ending will arrive. There is a whole extra ending sequence that Bioware prepared, and soon they'll release it

Then "Final Hours" came out, describing how the ending was put together, apparently completely seriously, and they were like:

Keighley is just playing along with Bioware's plan, just wait, they'll make an announcement soon.

Then Bioware talked about being upset with the criticism of their work, which they though was good, and the ITs were like:

It's all part of the leadup to the big reveal, news is coming soon, you'll see

Then Bioware said they would address fans' ending concerns with "new content initiatives", details coming in April, and ITs were like:

See? They basically confirmed that the "real" ending DLC is coming. Just wait till PAX where they'll make their triumphant announcement

Then the day before PAX Bioware announced they had reorganized their DLC schedule so they could start working on new "extended cut" ending DLC, which would be the only ending DLC, which wouldn't change the endings, but would just add some epilogues and clarification cinematics, due this Summer, and the IT's were like:

They're just talking about the "real" ending DLC, which will "clarify" by explaining that the other endings were hallucinations. They musn't have planned to originally release it until later, but they moved it forward. Just wait till PAX and you'll see

Then at PAX Bioware said Indoctrination Theorists were "um, committed", and that the ending DLC currently had no plans to include gameplay ("but keep giving feedback!"). They also said they wouldn't confirm or deny the Indoctrination Theory outright, and the ITs were like:

See? They basically just confirmed Indoctrination Theory. What else does "not confirm or deny" mean? Just wait until the DLC comes, you'll see.

TL;DR except for name of thread.

Yes I kinda do feel sorry for them, but not as much as I do for people so stupid that they will accept
a load of crap spray painted three colors and told its a delicacy. And I also feel bad for those that were smart
enough to send the load of crap back, but then when the crap is sent back
the cook polishes and tells them the problem is solved and they eat the load and say thank you.

[GBGriffin]

Zolt51 wrote...


@GBGriffin: Love your sig!

Thanks!

Modifié par GBGriffin, 07 avril 2012 - 01:28 .

[DarkWarSoldier]

Ivoryhammer wrote...

If they haven't denied it then it could still be true.

I was thinking the same thing too.

[RADIUMEYEZ]

GBGriffin wrote...

Armdin wrote...


I'm sorry, but when and where is that a euthanism for insane?

It's a term often used when placing someone in a mental institution. Fortunately, this definition popped up within the first few Google results.

Don't you go linking things around here sir! I will be forced to bring out Richard Simmons again and you won't like it.