comrade gando wrote...
I want them to explain how she took the picture. How she's out of her suit. Where she is. When she took it. etc etc, the thing is: this picture jumps the shark so high it ends up in outer space (literally). It is a poor attempt to reveal her face and it shows, and it brings up a dozen questions and answers none. After all, we still haven't really seen her face just that goofy goofy goofy picture.
AxholeRose wrote...
arthurhallam wrote...
YAWN. no one cares. the photo was fine & suited her character.
so what if it was a "stock image" - they still have to find it.
now, if you don't like it, go do something else with your life.
At first my reaction to your post was the same as your avatar
but then it quickly evolved into
This is what s/he does for fun.arthurhallam wrote...
that's why i'm doing everything i can to demoralise & crush the retake movement.
Modifié par TheCrakFox, 07 avril 2012 - 12:57 .
Aristic Integrity!TheCrakFox wrote...
This still baffles me. Their Tali's face was super lazy, pretty much the worst way they could've revealed it. But it would've been easier and better for them to just show nothing. So why do it?
Does not compute.
Marta Rio II wrote...
The Tali's face explanation made me face-palm so hard. Almost as hard as, "The fans didn't tell us that they didn't want an ending that was three identical cutscenes overlaid with a different color. So how were we to know?" statement.
Seriously guys. If you didn't want to give us an answer that wasn't total bull ****, then why even bring these things up?
Did they really say that about the fans? Because there's a lot of things I never said I didn't want that would have been infinitely better than the crap they shoveled out the door.Marta Rio II wrote...
The Tali's face explanation made me face-palm so hard. Almost as hard as, "The fans didn't tell us that they didn't want an ending that was three identical cutscenes overlaid with a different color. So how were we to know?" statement.
Seriously guys. If you didn't want to give us an answer that wasn't total bull ****, then why even bring these things up?
gmboy902 wrote...
arthurhallam wrote...
YAWN. no one cares. the photo was fine & suited her character.
so what if it was a "stock image" - they still have to find it.
now, if you don't like it, go do something else with your life.
Bioware. Can make brand new model for a random freeriding Chobot reporter. Can only photoshop a face for one of the series' most longstanding, loved characters.
Honestly, if Rockstar can get their hands on technology that can almost flawlessly imitate facial animation for LA Noire, I think it shouldn't be difficult for BioWare to at least take their poorly done photoshop and put it on a model that they already have 90% of.
That's not photoshopped enough. You'll never work for BioWare at this rate.jcmuki wrote...
Tali's Face:
Caz Tirin wrote...
That's not photoshopped enough. You'll never work for BioWare at this rate.jcmuki wrote...
Tali's Face:
liquiddemon wrote...
EA forced them to cut corners? Is that why EA allowed them to take an extra 4 months to polish up the game.
Remember the original launch date was Nov. Of 2011.
Hudathan wrote...
Some people are fine with the picture they got.
And nowhere does it say that it's not artistic to use a stock photo of something in the game. What if they thought it was a really good photo that was better than what they came up with. Who cares how it was made as long as it gets the point across.
Guest_Sparatus_*
UnstableMongoose wrote...
Go look at ME1 concept art. Tali was always intended to have an extremely human face. Every main character's face in Mass Effect is based off of a real-life model of some sort. Putting two and two together, what they did is the path that makes the most sense.
Modifié par Orange Tee, 07 avril 2012 - 01:45 .
Retour en haut
