Reapers kill everyone. No they dont. They destroy our militaries, which involves killing THEM, and then they harvest our civilians. Anderson and Hacket mention how they're collecting our world leaders and how they're dealing with our civilians. Its brought up over vidcom that our world leaders are being indoctrinated to urge people to support the reapers and do as they request of us to avoid bloodshed, just like what Saren tried to convince Shepard of.
Harvesting people is the same as killing them. Not exactly true. They melt down our bodies but preserve our minds. Previous civilizations live on as reapers. It makes sense if you know how physical your brain's thoughts and memories actually are. Killing your body and preserving your physical mind in a big flying metal casket is different from just being killed outright, a piece of who you are and who your people were lives on in these machine hybrids. Therefore this is a better fate for a civilization than just being wiped out entirely with no trace by thier robots. Its archiving to avoid anahilation.
The gun fires infinite bullets. Yes it does. Did you play ME1? Did you talk to Zaeed about Jesse in ME2? Do you know how these guns ACTUALLY work? They dont use actual ammunition, when you "reload your gun" you're just fast-cooling it, it's still using the same block of "ammo" that it will use forever. These guns shave off a tiny shred of metal and fling it using mass effect fields. This means that your guns never run out of ammunition, they just heat up. In ME1 you can mod your gun so that it never heats up at the expense of its fire power. In ME2 Zaeed tells you a story about firing his gun without needing to pop a heat sink and that it broke the gun in the end. The need to manage heat sinks is a safety mechanism of the gun itself. A modded gun or a gun that is set to NOT lock up when it overheats would be able to fire forever. (or until it breaks due to overuse)
Anderson and TIM appear out of nowhere. Wrong, for really obvious reasons. Anderson tells you that the walls are moving, you see the walls move. you dont see any other paths because they are closed up. Its told right to your face and people forget about it immediately. Here look I'll draw you a diagram:

Anderson mentions that he just saw a wall move, which could be a scenario where the red wall, where he started behind, was open, and the green wall, where you start behind, is closed. there could be many more passages behind every other wall. Thats what the mention of walls moving is supposed to establish. How people can not get this is beyond me.
If anyone has anymore feel free to post them.





Retour en haut






