Eain wrote...
Allan, if you'll forgive for just highlighting one specific part of your post (out of that huge wall that you put so much effort into):Allan Schumacher wrote...
I do agree that, while there's a unified movement for something to change for the ending, there are differences in what people want that complicate things.
I don't think that that's true. We're all pretty unanimous in one thing: we want Spacekid out. And while Bioware may object to that, we don't understand why. His addition explains nothing, and removing him allows for the story to make more sense. If his existence was intrinsically tied into core story elements, Bioware would have a case. But it's not, and all he does is sow confusion and anger. He's like the anathema to this story that somehow managed to wiggle its way in.
Removing it would please just about everyone. Even pro-enders wouldn't mind.
Removing the space kid would fix soooooo many problems, most notably the odd logic that the mass genocide of intellegent organics every 50,000 years is somehow preferable to the complete extinction of organics.
Only an AI (one that did not develop with the aid of organics, like EDI did) would see continious pain, horror, and suffering as a viable and preferable option. Shepard should be able to tell the space kid that he is full of poo, but no he just accepts it. WTF?
And as many a youtube edit has shown, removing the space kid is not hard, and actually makes the ending better. Just a little more abrupt.
The only thing that could be keeping the space kid in the game at this point is pride. Whoever invented the stupid thing does not want to admit he is wrong.
Edit: Grammar
Modifié par DocJill, 09 avril 2012 - 01:48 .





Retour en haut





