Aller au contenu

Photo

Why do ME devs never talk to us?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
218 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Guest_slyguy200_*

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests

Drone223 wrote...

LadyofRivendell wrote...

Because when they do, people here rip them apart. It's quite rude and sad.


^This

 


Really because whenever i have seen one show up people lighten up and all ask questions

Modifié par slyguy200, 08 avril 2012 - 09:57 .


#152
l7986

l7986
  • Members
  • 1 837 messages
They are to busy reading the PS3 tech support forums >.>

#153
Amioran

Amioran
  • Members
  • 1 416 messages

aLucidMind wrote...
It is fine to call Hudson and Walters talentless or incompetent when it comes to the ending, that is not an attack. That is an opinion and one can flat out call them that while remaining civil.


So in your opinion calling someone incompetent and talentless is not a personal attack/insult and perfectly civil. Good to know.

Apart the fact that to judge something you should be in a position to do so, and as I repeat 95% of the people here have not minimally the sort of background that allow such a judgement to be made and yet they pretend to be the maximum experts in the field, and apart the fact that saying a thing as that and then not having the ability to debate the motive in the specifics it's a clear example of why *you* are talentess/incompetent instead (but I'm digressing, sorry), if either the person you speak about is really talenteless or incompetent saying it so in a conversation or a forum is not civil at all just because it is true. That would be like saying that since a person is fat you can call him/her such as you like and it would not be an insult. I cannot believe that you are serious.

You can maybe say it in a formal critic (as in a journal as a review, because in this case the background it is different, but explaining here the difference will be too long so let's leave it at that, but also in that case it is only tolerable, not certainly polite at all), but in a personal conversation or in a place as this it is not civil at all and it is a personal attack. The fact that it can be true doesn't change this minimally.

Modifié par Amioran, 08 avril 2012 - 10:04 .


#154
Dridengx

Dridengx
  • Members
  • 1 813 messages

LadyofRivendell wrote...

Because when they do, people here rip them apart. It's quite rude and sad.



#155
Guest_aLucidMind_*

Guest_aLucidMind_*
  • Guests

Amioran wrote...

aLucidMind wrote...
It is fine to call Hudson and Walters talentless or incompetent when it comes to the ending, that is not an attack. That is an opinion and one can flat out call them that while remaining civil.


So in your opinion calling someone incompetent and talentless is not a personal attack/insult and perfectly civil. Good to know.

Apart the fact that to judge something you should be in a position to do so, and as I repeat 95% of the people here have not minimally the sort of background that allow such a judgement to be made and yet they pretend to be the maximum experts in the field, and apart the fact that saying a thing as that and then not having the ability to debate the motive in the specifics it's a clear example of why *you* are talentess/incompetent instead (but I'm digressing, sorry), if either the person you speak about is really talenteless or incompetent saying it so in a conversation or a forum is not civil at all just because it is true.

You can say it in a formal critic (as in a journal as a review, because in this case the background it is different, but explaining here the difference will be too long so let's leave it at that, but also in that case it is only tolerable, not certainly polite at all), but in a personal conversation or in a place as this it is not civil at all and it is a personal attack. The fact that it can be true doesn't change this minimally.

Like I said, one can voice the opinion that one feels another is incompetent and still remain civil about it. I never once said they were entirely incompetent, I have always said "in the case of the ending". Everybody has had moments of incompetence, but it is not a bad thing to call them out on it when they act like they created the most incredible thing ever despite everyone saying it sucks.

You do not need to be an expert in a field to judge someone in that field. It is never the opinion that is civil or uncivil, it is how it is stated and expressed that determines whether or not it is a civil statement.

#156
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages

slyguy200 wrote...
Really because whenever i have seen one show up people lighten up and all ask questions


Well it shows that you are new here.

#157
MICHELLE7

MICHELLE7
  • Members
  • 2 764 messages

slyguy200 wrote...

Drone223 wrote...

LadyofRivendell wrote...

Because when they do, people here rip them apart. It's quite rude and sad.


^This

 


Really because whenever i have seen one show up people lighten up and all ask questions


Actually I've seen it go both ways. Maybe they are just busy right now...hopefully working on ME3 related things.

I know the OP mentioned this but hats off to the DA devs...they really do a lot of comments on the DA boards...very informative even when it's more general info about writing and the gaming industry and not completely DA related...often very interesting posts.

#158
Guest_slyguy200_*

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests

Chewin3 wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...
Really because whenever i have seen one show up people lighten up and all ask questions


Well it shows that you are new here.

Well, i have only seen one or 5 show themselves.

Modifié par slyguy200, 08 avril 2012 - 10:06 .


#159
xsdob

xsdob
  • Members
  • 8 575 messages
There was the fan transcribed interview with patrick weekes yesterday, oh an mike gamble stooped by to post two comments in that thread about 2 hours ago at the time of posting this. Sorry your missed it op.

http://social.biowar...ndex/11154234/1

#160
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages

slyguy200 wrote...
Well, i have only seen one or 5 show themselves.


Stick around. There will be plenty.

#161
Amioran

Amioran
  • Members
  • 1 416 messages

aLucidMind wrote...
Like I said, one can voice the opinion that one feels another is incompetent and still remain civil about it.


No, you cannot. Saying incompetent to another it is an insult. The fact that it's true or not true doesn't change that.

If you say to a fat person that s/he is fat you cannot pretend that you are not insulting just because it is true.

aLucidMind wrote...
Everybody has had moments of incompetence, but it is not a bad thing to call them out on it when they act like they created the most incredible thing ever despite everyone saying it sucks.


"Everyone" it's a bit of exageration, don't you think?
Everybody may have had moments of incompetence, as everybody may have had moments when they have been stupid, but anyway saying "you are stupid" is an insult.

You can say: "for this and that the end is written stupidly or incompetently" because in this case the subject is different. In this case you attack the work, not the person.

aLucidMind wrote...
You do not need to be an expert in a field to judge someone in that field.


To judge? Yes, you need it. To have an opinion on it not, but to JUDGE, yes, you need to be an expert, elsewhere your judgment is obviously flawed from beginning. Having an opinion on a thing and stating a judgment are two completely different things and they require a complete different expertise.

aLucidMind wrote...
It is never the opinion that is civil or uncivil, it is how it is stated and expressed that determines whether or not it is a civil statement.


On this we agree. In fact saying "incompetent" to a person is an uncivil way to state your bad opinion on his/her work.

Modifié par Amioran, 08 avril 2012 - 10:12 .


#162
Guest_aLucidMind_*

Guest_aLucidMind_*
  • Guests

Amioran wrote...

aLucidMind wrote...
Like I said, one can voice the opinion that one feels another is incompetent and still remain civil about it.


No, you cannot. Saying incompetent to another it is an insult. The fact that it's true or not true doesn't change that.

If you say to a fat person that s/he is fat you cannot pretend that you are not insulting just because it is true.

If they are offended by simply being called fat when they are fat, then that is their problem. If you do not like the fact that you are fat and do not like being called fat, then do what you can to remedy that. If you cannot, then take pride in the fact that you cannot due to thyroid conditions or whatever. If you refuse to, then you have no right to be offended. Now, if they're being called fat in a hostile or rude manner then they have the right to be offended. Just like a black man should not be offended if he is called black unless it is in an insulting manner.

I have been called incompetent; if they have facts to back up their claim and state them in a manner of civility then I have absolutely no problem with it. They have given me what I should focus on improving. If they call me incompetent in-general just because they feel they could do better, then I still am not offended because it is their opinion. If they cannot prove to me that their opinion is baseless, their opinion is irrelevant and serves no purpose. No point in being offended in either situation.

Amioran wrote...

aLucidMind wrote...
Everybody has had moments of incompetence, but it is not a bad thing to call them out on it when they act like they created the most incredible thing ever despite everyone saying it sucks.


"Everyone" it's a bit of exageration, don't you think?
Everybody may have had moments of incompetence, as everybody may have had moments when they have been stupid, but anyway saying "you are stupid" is an insult.

You can say: "for this and that the end is written stupidly or incompetently" because in this case the subject is different. In this case you attack the work, not the person.

Yes, it is a bit of an exaggeration lol. I meant "a very large number of people"; one of those moments where the wrong word or phrase slips out instead.

That is why you say "that was a stupid thing" or "you're acting like an idiot". That is not an insult, that is telling them how they are acting so they may remedy that. Without sufficient proof, one cannot call another an idiot; they can only acknowledge that the person is saying something stupid and that it is a possibility that they are very intelligent with just one exception. If someone truly is an idiot and are offended by being called out on it and refuse to do anything to educate themselves, then they have no right to complain.

Yes, perhaps I should be using that phrasing instead of calling them incompetent in a universal fashion.

Amioran wrote...

aLucidMind wrote...
You do not need to be an expert in a field to judge someone in that field.


To judge? Yes, you need it. To have an opinion on it not, but to JUDGE, yes, you need to be an expert, elsewhere your judgment is obviously flawed from beginning. Having an opinion on a thing and stating a judgment are two completely different things and they require a complete different expertise.


You do not. I do not need to be an expert in mental health in order judge Charles Manson as a delusional nutjob. While you need to have the facts in order to judge someone, all you require is the facts pertaining to that person and the situation as opposed to the field as a whole.

Modifié par aLucidMind, 08 avril 2012 - 10:45 .


#163
bigbade

bigbade
  • Members
  • 513 messages

AJRimmsey wrote...

one thing this thread did right was get the forum trolls to come out from under the bridge again.

at least the OP can no longer be mystified as to why devs dont post on forums


Not really, I don't see any trolls in my thread. I see bad posts sure, but I see good ones as well. A bad post doesn't necessarily mean it's a troll, it's just a bad post. 

Will read what I missed and comment x) company of heroes keeping me up late. 

#164
OdanUrr

OdanUrr
  • Members
  • 11 060 messages

LadyofRivendell wrote...

Because when they do, people here rip them apart. It's quite rude and sad.


Couldn't have put it better myself.

#165
AnoraBlows

AnoraBlows
  • Members
  • 73 messages
To all those saying that they'd be ripped apart and what not:

DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE OP?

David Gaider, the lead writer for Dragon Age, regularly posts on the DA forums and replies to fans. Even though DA2 was a mediocre game that was a disgrace to the series, he still posts there! Fans can work together for the betterment of the game. If someone is rude, they can be easily banned and their posts binned. This is also what happens on the DA2 forums, where as soon as criticism oversteps past its boundaries into insult territory, the user is rightfully banned.

#166
Guest_Shelmusk_*

Guest_Shelmusk_*
  • Guests

xsdob wrote...

There was the fan transcribed interview with patrick weekes yesterday, oh an mike gamble stooped by to post two comments in that thread about 2 hours ago at the time of posting this. Sorry your missed it op.

http://social.biowar...ndex/11154234/1


He already left because somebody posted a trollface pic. While I think that this really was a bit uncalled for, I also think it's sad the devs can't take even the slightest bit of heat without leaving the threads.

After all, they're more or less responsible for that heat in one or the other way and the PR has been a desaster so far...

#167
bigbade

bigbade
  • Members
  • 513 messages

Amioran wrote...

bigbade wrote...
1) It's a twisting of words in a very vague statement that ultimately didn't say much of anything.


What's vague on one that says "fans are almost co-authors now"? It is just a matter of saying, as a singer can say "my fans are what make me write what I do". Both are statements of gratitude, not certainly of a literal right to autorship.

bigbade wrote...
That's why it's so easy to twist


????

You can twist the meaning only if A) you have an IQ of an aomeba, B) you do it willingly to have a point on pretending a change in their work (as the guy is doing). There's no other way around.

bigbade wrote...
if Casey Hudson had come out and said "we're scrapping starchild" there is no other way to interpret that.
Still, intelligent-based elitism will never get you anywhere because it's a direct attack on people. Even if you don't have to take them seriously, you want their money and by calling them a simpleton you won't be getting it :P


????

Actually that sentence was said even before ME3 came out, so I don't have any idea of what you are talking about here.

bigbade wrote...
2) No, I can't expect the devs to do that. But I'm not asking them to do that, there are at LEAST 3-5 good threads on a page at any given time, a dev can drop in at any interval and find something worth posting in. It would give a sense of actual interaction instead of "we are listening"


Again, it would serve nothing. If you try to put a drop a of water in the fire it doesn't make any difference at all on just simply doing nothing at all, and on the contrary it can either result in a worse result given the oxygen contained in it. In this case, non methaphorically speaking, it would just arise flaming either more, given the majority of the audience's mindset.

bigbade wrote...
3) They won't be wrong because they're the only ones who know what's right and wrong in it. People will disagree and, worst case scenario, insults will fly but when the dust settles they're the ones with the dev tools.


The dust never settles when the wind is at 200 mhp/h.  


1) the statement, the whole thing. It basically said nothing. You can re-read it if you like and tell me what you got from it, it's a statement on the conclusion but all it talks about the pride Casey takes in the team for their hard work and that they're listening to criticism. 

2) The fact that it's so vague is what makes that statement (the whole thing, not just that sentence) so easy to twist.
-" "I'd like to thank the whole ME team", See how he doesn't mention the VA Cast? Casey hates voices! To the stake!"

Like that.

3) Casey said they were scrapping starchild before me3 came out? really now? I said if Casey would come out, today, now, and say "We are getting rid of Starchild" there would be no OTHER way to interpret that. It's not vague, it's solid.

4) If their comment doesn't provoke more speculation, there's no reason it shouldn't fan any flames. Reference: Patrick Weekes Q&A. People are grateful for the most part in that thread, the only person who even remotely compromised it was Jessica Merezan saying it was full of half-truths and that it angers her.

5) No matter what bioware does or says the winds won't be at 200 mp/h forever. People will eventually get tired of their crap and move on, and that dust will settle, and Mass Effect will forever be remembered by what Bioware makes of it. 

Modifié par bigbade, 09 avril 2012 - 12:03 .


#168
bigbade

bigbade
  • Members
  • 513 messages
For the record I'd still say Walters & Hudson had a moment of incompetence rather than being incompetent, that generalizes it as them being incompetent in general, but even then I wouldn't call them either of that. 


incompetence: Not having the necessary skills to do something successfully.

They obviously have the skills, at best I would make the assumption that they lacked good judgment vis-a-vis their game's continuity, setting, and logic when making the ending. This is what makes me kind of believe the maybe-true-maybe-false Patrick Weekes denied post claiming they did it alone, but I won't, however, lean on it as fact.

AnuraBlows...

o all those saying that they'd be ripped apart and what not:

DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE OP?

David Gaider, the lead writer for Dragon Age, regularly posts on the DA forums and replies to fans. Even though DA2 was a mediocre game that was a disgrace to the series, he still posts there! Fans can work together for the betterment of the game. If someone is rude, they can be easily banned and their posts binned. This is also what happens on the DA2 forums, where as soon as criticism oversteps past its boundaries into insult territory, the user is rightfully banned.


I'll admit, that irks me. 
Please read the OP before posting and if possible read the whole thread or at least the back and forths" There's nothing more frustrating than having to reply to someone who only read the thread title :bandit:

Modifié par bigbade, 09 avril 2012 - 01:16 .


#169
Adanu

Adanu
  • Members
  • 1 400 messages
Have you read ANY of the troll threads in this forum?

If you read even one, you'll understand why. I'd not touch this cesspit with a ten foot pole if I was a dev, with the amount of stupidity the last month.

#170
xsdob

xsdob
  • Members
  • 8 575 messages
Just a quick update, mike gamble was on the forums and got driven off by someone posting a huge picture of a bioware troll face and saying that was about as much as the devs cared about the fans.

So congrats.

Modifié par xsdob, 09 avril 2012 - 12:14 .


#171
bigbade

bigbade
  • Members
  • 513 messages
They don't go past 2-3 pages. Good discussion threads usually last a while, and if not their thread title indicates it as well as potential star rating. There's plenty of features to be able to judge before-hand what's worth reading and what isn't, and with big threads keeping track of links to articles/posts/videos it shouldn't be hard to find.

If the OP is trolling the rest will troll, why read further? Bioware devs aren't oblivious and they aren't new to this, come on.

#172
DRUNK_CANADIAN

DRUNK_CANADIAN
  • Members
  • 2 275 messages
TBH, they never came here, even before the ME3 incident, you may get the odd marketing pop in and post or something to that effect, but its been apparently most active in the MP section of the ME3 forums.

Although by comparison, this is more interaction than what is seen in Mass Effect 3.

#173
bigbade

bigbade
  • Members
  • 513 messages

xsdob wrote...

Just a quick update, mike gamble was on the forums and got driven off by someone posting a huge picture of a bioware troll face and saying that was about as much as the devs cared about the fans.

So congrats.


If one troll face was all it took then it's a sad day for forumites. Either they make every forum be game-registered only or they be ready to face idiots, that's just the way the internet works, there are no forums without trolls and if they exist that's because they are heavily moderated. Priestly can't possibly keep up with all the threads that spawn not only every day, but every minute. 

Dunno why you're saying congrats, I wasn't even in the thread, but thanks. 

TBH, they never came here, even before the ME3 incident, you may get the odd marketing pop in and post or something to that effect, but its been apparently most active in the MP section of the ME3 forums.

Although by comparison, this is more interaction than what is seen in Mass Effect 3.


This, and in the past ME games as well. People saying they don't come here cause clearly 95% of this place has nothing better to do than to ****** people off and trash on developers don't get it that ME dev posts were never a factor, it was and is very rare, which sucks because I would have liked to see more of them and still do. 

#174
Aesieru

Aesieru
  • Members
  • 4 201 messages
They illegally false advertised. Why the hell would they want to come out in the open with that potential truth ready to throw at them.

Also... posting a troll face doesn't make you a troll. Mike has very clearly indicated he listens but doesn't hear, he also illegally advertised via mis-information. And that's not all.

Modifié par Aesieru, 09 avril 2012 - 12:25 .


#175
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

bigbade wrote...

Now people might say it's because this whole forum is a cesspool of insults, whining, and ending discussion galore. Yeah, but it's pretty obvious that it WOULDN'T be if we didn't have so many questions about it. Questions that could be answered via a forum post(see Patrick Weekes Q&A thread).
 

Are you kidding?

If there's anything BSN has proven, it's that any attempt to talk to them invites people pre-determined to pick apart everything in the worst possible way.