aLucidMind wrote...
Like I said, one can voice the opinion that one feels another is incompetent and still remain civil about it.
No, you cannot. Saying incompetent to another it is an insult. The fact that it's true or not true doesn't change that.
If you say to a fat person that s/he is fat you cannot pretend that you are not insulting just because it is true.
aLucidMind wrote...
Everybody has had moments of incompetence, but it is not a bad thing to call them out on it when they act like they created the most incredible thing ever despite everyone saying it sucks.
"Everyone" it's a bit of exageration, don't you think?
Everybody may have had moments of incompetence, as everybody may have had moments when they have been stupid, but anyway saying "you are stupid" is an insult.
You can say: "for this and that the end is written stupidly or incompetently" because in this case the subject is different. In this case you attack the work, not the person.
aLucidMind wrote...
You do not need to be an expert in a field to judge someone in that field.
To judge? Yes, you need it. To have an
opinion on it not, but to JUDGE, yes, you need to be an expert, elsewhere your judgment is obviously flawed from beginning. Having an opinion on a thing and stating a judgment are two completely different things and they require a complete different expertise.
aLucidMind wrote...
It is never the opinion that is civil or uncivil, it is how it is stated and expressed that determines whether or not it is a civil statement.
On this we agree. In fact saying "incompetent" to a person is an uncivil way to state your bad opinion on his/her work.
Modifié par Amioran, 08 avril 2012 - 10:12 .