Aller au contenu

Photo

The Ending was Good


395 réponses à ce sujet

#26
OutlawTorn6806

OutlawTorn6806
  • Members
  • 435 messages

kbct wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

OutlawTorn6806 wrote...

Get ready for Kbct and his crew. And his poll. lol


So true. :lol:


Okay, fair enough. No polls for now. How about this? This is the best gif I've seen for ME3:

Image IPB




That big hairy thing must've been ME 2

#27
lx_theo

lx_theo
  • Members
  • 1 182 messages

sparkyo42 wrote...

floppypig wrote...

lx_theo wrote...

 *Readies Omni-Shield of Invulnerability*

Yes, I said it. The ending was good. It wasn't great. It wasn't amazing. It wasn't the quality the series deserved to end on after such a great run. But it was good.

Many of the so called "plotholes" can easily be explained relatively easily without creating a whole conspiracy around it. There are a few that seem like oversights, like the sudden appearance of certain characters in ending scenes.

The whole Indoctrination Theory is just silly, and while it would be cool, it would also make no sense for Bioware to do without having actual content afterwards in the released title. Not to mention much of this "proof" is nothing of the sort, and a lot of it is non sequitur even when together.

Other than that, the greatest failing was that it didn't provide enough closure. The universe had many ways it could develop afterwards based on how things turned out on many different fronts throughout the game. The problem with the ending is that it doesn't reference these and specify what happens to provide said closure. Bioware is doing the smart thing is offering an ending that gives more closure.

So, the ending was good. All this hate for it is absolutely ridiculous.


100% Agree. And it looks like the extended cut should give us that closure. 

Also, mostof the plotholes can be answered with just a little bit of imagination - it really isn't that difficult. 


Sure and after Ackbar orders the attack, we could have a random selection of stills to end the Star Wars Triology, and be told as we the original viewers leave the cinema to imagine everything else. Except not even Lucas would be that dumb.

An Ending should end things not leave SPECULATION for everyone.

To me if a writer tells me to "imagine" major issues/answers in the story then they are just lazy or don't give a **** about the story or the fans.


That's why i said it failed in providing closure. The imagination has more to do with the plot holes people claim (and for that list that was posted... I'm slowly going through those and typing up replies atm)

#28
Banelash

Banelash
  • Members
  • 382 messages
hi, please explain how all your choices through out the whole game didn't matter or wasn't shown at the end.

Example, sword fight, after all ships relayed in, if you look at the battle , you will only see the turians and alliance. hammer fight, no traces of the other races except in cutscenes, and the cutscenes don't reflect your choices again. Like wrex pulling out the krogan unit, and look, krogan is still there. Also if you actually try, like me, to do a full EMS and a low EMS, the only difference is you don't have access to the control and synth. All your choices didn't matter.

#29
LegendaryBlade

LegendaryBlade
  • Members
  • 1 482 messages
The ending was good if you like Deus Ex Machinas and Gainax Endings maybe. Everything after the magic space elevator is one bad trope after another.

#30
charmingcharlie

charmingcharlie
  • Members
  • 1 674 messages

lx_theo wrote...  *facepalm*

You don't think its to curb bad PR? If any group is vocal enough about something, they will give enough bad PR that it could hurt their reputation enough for later sales. Business. Simple.


I see your *facepalm* and raise you with a *double facepalm*  no if it is a "minority" upset with the ending then it wouldn't be affecting them that greatly and they could easily ignore it.  Especially when you consider nearly all the PR so far has been on Bioware's side with numerous sites attacking those that hate the endings.  

Why would Bioware care about a "minority of 60,000" complainers if they apparently sold 3.5 million copies ?  After all that is 3.4 million people that are happy with the end (according to some on here).  So no a company wouldn't bother to waste resources on a measily 60,000 people they would instead spend those resources on the 3.4 million that are happy and try to milk more money out of them rather than appease a "minority" with free content.

The reason they are doing it is because there has been a HUGE backlash against the awful endings. 

#31
JBONE27

JBONE27
  • Members
  • 1 241 messages

lx_theo wrote...

acidic-ph0 wrote...

Anyone who believes that deus ex machina is a good way to end a story like Mass Effect doesn't know what good writing is.

In fact deus ex machina is practically synonymous with bad writing.


You have a better way to defeat the Reapers in one fell stroke? Unless you were expecting the beginning of a scavenger hunt be on the Crucible, there wasn't much other way the story could have ended.

SteamieHotPlayer wrote...

good? then you are the minority.



A minority on the internet. And we all know that the vocal part of the internet is the absolute voice of all who played it.


Kanner wrote...

What was good about it?


It fit the theme tof the game.
It really wrapped me up in the moment when the time came.
It wasn't a happy ending. That would have seem more like pandering than anything.

Overall it was satisfying enough to not make me mad, but it wasn't amazing enough for me to incredibly happy about it either.


Point 1.  It could have simply disrupted all reaper tech for a time, allowing the fleet to take out as many of them 
to destroy as many as the EMS would allow in the given time.  That would have fit in a lot better, and had more to do with what you spent most of your time doing, gathering allies.

Point 2.  Most people didn't finish it at all, and never will because of all the negativity.

Point 3.  

A) How do you figure?  Did it fit in with the theme of diversity?  Nope.  Did it fit in with the theme of teamwork? Not really.  Did it fit in with the theme of exploration? Nein.  Did it fit in with the theme of freewill overcoming fate?  Actually it did just the opposite.  Did it fit in with the theme of family? Not at all.  Did it fit in with the theme of facing your past?  Wasn't even touched upon.  So, what theme are you thinking of?

B) You must get wraped up really easily because as soon as the elivator came I was bored and confused.

C) I will agree, it wasn't a happy ending.  It was a nonsensical, plot-hole ridden, insanely idiotic ending.

#32
mebtru

mebtru
  • Members
  • 137 messages

lx_theo wrote...

mebtru wrote...

He dont even have the game registered.
Fail troll 1/10 for making me write


My brother bought it and brought i back over his srping break for college. I played it over that. I've yet to buy it myself adn play through it again. I'm currently playing through ME1 and 2 again before I go adn buy it.


So much fail, you dont have ME2 registered.

#33
sparkyo42

sparkyo42
  • Members
  • 434 messages

It fit the theme tof the game.
It really wrapped me up in the moment when the time came.
It wasn't a happy ending. That would have seem more like pandering than anything.

Overall it was satisfying enough to not make me mad, but it wasn't amazing enough for me to incredibly happy about it either.


To me the last 10 minutes fit the theme like Stargate Universe fit the theme of the rest of the Stargate shows. About 15 years of Space Opera with 2 years of "Battlestar Galactica lite". Remind me what happened there?

For 2.9 of the games if you wanted you could beat the odds and then reality comes in and you get run over by WH40K Death.

Each are good but shifting themes in the dying end of a Trilogy is just ill timing to put it mildly.

#34
Vanek86

Vanek86
  • Members
  • 41 messages
It was good just because, the plotholes can be easily explained but I wont tell you. IT is silly because i think so.

#35
OutlawTorn6806

OutlawTorn6806
  • Members
  • 435 messages

mebtru wrote...

lx_theo wrote...

mebtru wrote...

He dont even have the game registered.
Fail troll 1/10 for making me write


My brother bought it and brought i back over his srping break for college. I played it over that. I've yet to buy it myself adn play through it again. I'm currently playing through ME1 and 2 again before I go adn buy it.


So much fail, you dont have ME2 registered.


Who can blame him. It sucks. 

#36
Suikoden

Suikoden
  • Members
  • 158 messages

Zany Jedi wrote...

In that case, could you please explain the plotholes? Also I would be hard pressed to call an ending with a deus ex machina good, lazy and poorly written is more like it in my opinion.


Indoctrination Theory.  Only lazy and poorly written when taken at face value.

#37
JBONE27

JBONE27
  • Members
  • 1 241 messages

beutelmarkus wrote...

Zany Jedi wrote...

In that case, could you please explain the plotholes? Also I would be hard pressed to call an ending with a deus ex machina good, lazy and poorly written is more like it in my opinion.


Indoctrination Theory.  Only lazy and poorly written when taken at face value.


Unfortunatly, acording to what Weekes recently said, there is a very low chance of it being IT.  Which is a shame because adding post IT stuff to the game would be awesome.  I mean turning on your crew and everyone if you chose wrong, that would be amazing.

#38
Zany Jedi

Zany Jedi
  • Members
  • 123 messages

beutelmarkus wrote...

Zany Jedi wrote...

In that case, could you please explain the plotholes? Also I would be hard pressed to call an ending with a deus ex machina good, lazy and poorly written is more like it in my opinion.


Indoctrination Theory.  Only lazy and poorly written when taken at face value.


I agree IT is the best way to fix the plotholes, but it has yet to be proven by Bioware. In fact I would say IT is fairly unlikely at this point. In any case, I'm interested as to how the plotholes can be explained at face value as the OP suggested.

#39
lx_theo

lx_theo
  • Members
  • 1 182 messages

mebtru wrote...

lx_theo wrote...

mebtru wrote...

He dont even have the game registered.
Fail troll 1/10 for making me write


My brother bought it and brought i back over his srping break for college. I played it over that. I've yet to buy it myself adn play through it again. I'm currently playing through ME1 and 2 again before I go adn buy it.


So much fail, you dont have ME2 registered.


I don't? I do own it for both PC and PS3 mind you. 

Wierd. I must have started registering after I bought Origins (which was late, actually a few weeks before DA2 came out).

or do you have my life story with you at the moment?

#40
lx_theo

lx_theo
  • Members
  • 1 182 messages

charmingcharlie wrote...

lx_theo wrote...  *facepalm*

You don't think its to curb bad PR? If any group is vocal enough about something, they will give enough bad PR that it could hurt their reputation enough for later sales. Business. Simple.


I see your *facepalm* and raise you with a *double facepalm*  no if it is a "minority" upset with the ending then it wouldn't be affecting them that greatly and they could easily ignore it.  Especially when you consider nearly all the PR so far has been on Bioware's side with numerous sites attacking those that hate the endings.  

Why would Bioware care about a "minority of 60,000" complainers if they apparently sold 3.5 million copies ?  After all that is 3.4 million people that are happy with the end (according to some on here).  So no a company wouldn't bother to waste resources on a measily 60,000 people they would instead spend those resources on the 3.4 million that are happy and try to milk more money out of them rather than appease a "minority" with free content.

The reason they are doing it is because there has been a HUGE backlash against the awful endings. 


Okay, I'm sure thr thousands and thousands of people who are actively going against it are definitely a great representation of the 3.4 million. You have no proof if its really the majority or the minority. Neither do I. Claiming so means nothing.

#41
Suikoden

Suikoden
  • Members
  • 158 messages

JBONE27 wrote...

beutelmarkus wrote...

Zany Jedi wrote...

In that case, could you please explain the plotholes? Also I would be hard pressed to call an ending with a deus ex machina good, lazy and poorly written is more like it in my opinion.


Indoctrination Theory.  Only lazy and poorly written when taken at face value.


Unfortunatly, acording to what Weekes recently said, there is a very low chance of it being IT.  Which is a shame because adding post IT stuff to the game would be awesome.  I mean turning on your crew and everyone if you chose wrong, that would be amazing.


I don't think they'd choose to give away that the IT is what they're going for.  Doing that basically ends all speculation and kills all of the back and forth regarding interpretations to the current ending(s).  As long as we don't know if it's true or not, our interest will remain piqued leading up to the free DLC (which will probably encourage the purchase of yet more DLC).

It wouldn't be good business to come right out and confirm or deny the IT.   

#42
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

lx_theo wrote...

That's why i said it failed in providing closure. The imagination has more to do with the plot holes people claim (and for that list that was posted... I'm slowly going through those and typing up replies atm)


Don't waste your time many on here have done as you plan to do but they reject any answer your supply, dismiss it out of hand without regard for content because they are not willing to accept anything outside of being shown instead of told by others, additional possiblities. It is a trap, ask a loaded question with no possibility they (most but not all) will accept your reasoning.

#43
lx_theo

lx_theo
  • Members
  • 1 182 messages

JBONE27 wrote...

Point 1.  It could have simply disrupted all reaper tech for a time, allowing the fleet to take out as many of them 
to destroy as many as the EMS would allow in the given time.  That would have fit in a lot better, and had more to do with what you spent most of your time doing, gathering allies.

Point 2.  Most people didn't finish it at all, and never will because of all the negativity.

Point 3.  

A) How do you figure?  Did it fit in with the theme of diversity?  Nope.  Did it fit in with the theme of teamwork? Not really.  Did it fit in with the theme of exploration? Nein.  Did it fit in with the theme of freewill overcoming fate?  Actually it did just the opposite.  Did it fit in with the theme of family? Not at all.  Did it fit in with the theme of facing your past?  Wasn't even touched upon.  So, what theme are you thinking of?

B) You must get wraped up really easily because as soon as the elivator came I was bored and confused.

C) I will agree, it wasn't a happy ending.  It was a nonsensical, plot-hole ridden, insanely idiotic ending.


Point 1:
Sounds very underwhelming. Probably not what they were going for. Then again. People would have been complaining there about only having on real ending.

Point 2
Based on what? I severely doubt you have any proof of that.

Point 3
A) It felt foreshadowed. When it came time for it to come, i wasn't surprised by it because it felt like the game was building up to choices like that. The entire game felt like it was hinting at those sort of choices. That's how it fits the theme. 

B) I prefer story based games, so I found it fun. Then again, what are opinions if people don't have them?

C) Prove it

#44
Zany Jedi

Zany Jedi
  • Members
  • 123 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

lx_theo wrote...

That's why i said it failed in providing closure. The imagination has more to do with the plot holes people claim (and for that list that was posted... I'm slowly going through those and typing up replies atm)


Don't waste your time many on here have done as you plan to do but they reject any answer your supply, dismiss it out of hand without regard for content because they are not willing to accept anything outside of being shown instead of told by others, additional possiblities. It is a trap, ask a loaded question with no possibility they (most but not all) will accept your reasoning.


eerrrrr...I haven't rejected any answer the OP supplied, I'm legitmately interested in the OP's reasoning.  

Modifié par Zany Jedi, 09 avril 2012 - 04:42 .


#45
JBONE27

JBONE27
  • Members
  • 1 241 messages

beutelmarkus wrote...

JBONE27 wrote...

beutelmarkus wrote...

Zany Jedi wrote...

In that case, could you please explain the plotholes? Also I would be hard pressed to call an ending with a deus ex machina good, lazy and poorly written is more like it in my opinion.


Indoctrination Theory.  Only lazy and poorly written when taken at face value.


Unfortunatly, acording to what Weekes recently said, there is a very low chance of it being IT.  Which is a shame because adding post IT stuff to the game would be awesome.  I mean turning on your crew and everyone if you chose wrong, that would be amazing.


I don't think they'd choose to give away that the IT is what they're going for.  Doing that basically ends all speculation and kills all of the back and forth regarding interpretations to the current ending(s).  As long as we don't know if it's true or not, our interest will remain piqued leading up to the free DLC (which will probably encourage the purchase of yet more DLC).

It wouldn't be good business to come right out and confirm or deny the IT.   


No you're misunderstanding me, here's where I got his quotes.

http://social.biowar.../index/11155956

#46
lx_theo

lx_theo
  • Members
  • 1 182 messages

Zany Jedi wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

lx_theo wrote...

That's why i said it failed in providing closure. The imagination has more to do with the plot holes people claim (and for that list that was posted... I'm slowly going through those and typing up replies atm)


Don't waste your time many on here have done as you plan to do but they reject any answer your supply, dismiss it out of hand without regard for content because they are not willing to accept anything outside of being shown instead of told by others, additional possiblities. It is a trap, ask a loaded question with no possibility they (most but not all) will accept your reasoning.


eerrrrr...I haven't rejected any answer the OP supplied, I'm legitmately interested in the OP's reasoning.  


You've been respectful unlike some of these people. That's why I'm working through making responses to that list you linked to. I'll hopefully finish it sometime soon.

#47
Guest_BrotherWarth_*

Guest_BrotherWarth_*
  • Guests
When people defend the ending I just have to assume that they don't put much thought into it. The ending isn't bad because it was sad or lacked closure. The ending was bad because it was poorly written. An English professor would tell you why it's bad and give you a failing grade. There is objectively bad writing and that ending is an example of it.
I expected the crucible to be a big EMP that shut off all technology, so I was perfectly prepared for a "sad" ending. I never in my wildest dreams suspected a magic space God would lay down the worst troll logic on me and I would have to just have to say "...O-okay."

#48
hex23

hex23
  • Members
  • 743 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

And thats supposed to change his enjoyment of it how? For not being a sheep he should enjoy it less?

Majority or minority is irrelevant here.


Oh now I understand....so you guys that claim to like the ending are doing so because you don't want to be labeled sheep? Uh....buddy....sometimes the majority is actually right. Fight the power when it actually makes sense, not because you want to be a unique snowflake that "gets" the ending of "ME3".

Modifié par hex23, 09 avril 2012 - 04:54 .


#49
Tessir Kaerak

Tessir Kaerak
  • Members
  • 107 messages
You know what sucks? When I come onto these forums to see what cool little easter eggs people have found, what their fave gun is for their vanguard, or how they messed up a good thing with Liara by fooling around with Traynor and all I see is topic after topic consisting of b!*ching over the ending.

It's the last thirty minutes of a thirty hour game. I get it. You can't move on with your life. Please stop. If ME is ruined for you find another game. I still love it. It's still the best series of this generation for me and many others.Let us enjoy the forums again.

#50
JBONE27

JBONE27
  • Members
  • 1 241 messages

lx_theo wrote...

JBONE27 wrote...

Point 1.  It could have simply disrupted all reaper tech for a time, allowing the fleet to take out as many of them 
to destroy as many as the EMS would allow in the given time.  That would have fit in a lot better, and had more to do with what you spent most of your time doing, gathering allies.

Point 2.  Most people didn't finish it at all, and never will because of all the negativity.

Point 3.  

A) How do you figure?  Did it fit in with the theme of diversity?  Nope.  Did it fit in with the theme of teamwork? Not really.  Did it fit in with the theme of exploration? Nein.  Did it fit in with the theme of freewill overcoming fate?  Actually it did just the opposite.  Did it fit in with the theme of family? Not at all.  Did it fit in with the theme of facing your past?  Wasn't even touched upon.  So, what theme are you thinking of?

B) You must get wraped up really easily because as soon as the elivator came I was bored and confused.

C) I will agree, it wasn't a happy ending.  It was a nonsensical, plot-hole ridden, insanely idiotic ending.


Point 1:
Sounds very underwhelming. Probably not what they were going for. Then again. People would have been complaining there about only having on real ending.

Point 2
Based on what? I severely doubt you have any proof of that.

Point 3
A) It felt foreshadowed. When it came time for it to come, i wasn't surprised by it because it felt like the game was building up to choices like that. The entire game felt like it was hinting at those sort of choices. That's how it fits the theme. 

B) I prefer story based games, so I found it fun. Then again, what are opinions if people don't have them?

C) Prove it


Point 1: That's your oppinion, but I think most people would prefer seeing what we've worked hard to aquire acutally fight instead of just being numbers.

Point 2:  Why Most Gamers Start but Don’t Finish Video Games - Digg

Point 3:  
A)  I told you the major themes of Mass Effect and you brought up foreshadowing?  You don't actually know what themes are do you?
B)  So you prefer things to go from intesnely emotional to WTF? in less than a minute.
C)  Why should Shepard trust a little boy that (s)he knew for about one minute over, say, Shepard's LI?  Why did Shepard walk towards the explosion instead of shooting the tube from a save distance?  Why shoot the tube at all, how does shooting at something fix it?  Why didn't the Reapers just destroy the Crucible?  How did Admeral Hackett know Shepard was there when earlier he said that no one was around the beam?  Why was Joker flying away from the battle without Shepard?  Why was Shepard's LI not looking for him/her in the wreckage (this is especially true for Liara)?  How could that machine merge organic and synthetic DNA?  Since when do machines have DNA?  And of course the classic, "Sythetics always kill their creators, so to prevent that I created a race of synthetics to kill organics,"  which is roughly the equivalent to a dentist saying, "I'm going to take out all of your teeth, so your teeth won't fall out."