Master Che wrote...
So there's no such thing as genetic modification? How does that get extrapolated into a beam of light? Well, if radiation can affect your DNA and you can't see it...and if said beams of light contained little nanobots (nanoscience exists, btw), something not foreign to the ME world, then...
The fact that you're trying to inject an explanation for Synthesis proves you do understand the problem of it having no explanation. There's a difference between sci-fi and fantasy. One attempts to give you an explanation founded in some quasi-scientific (albeit fictional) fashion. Historically, sci-fi has actually served as a foreshadowing for future actual technology because of its commitment to find a rational basis from which to explain the possibility of what it is presenting to you.
On the other hand, fantasy gives no explanation nor do you expect one. It is inherently non-scientific, and it never pretends to be anything other than "magic," beyond or otherwise not requiring an explanation of how it works. The theory behind the Crucible was that it was a behemoth of technology that seemed to be, unavoidably, above the contemporary understanding for those working to construct it. That was already dangerously close to shedding the constraints of sci-fi and moving into fantasy. Synthesis pushed it over the edge with its clearly outlandish consequences.
It was a transgression of pushing the genre from sci-fi into fantasy. The same transgression has happened in reverse (midi-chlorians). It's a legitimate problem and a valid complaint because of the genre, stop pretending to not understand the issue.
Modifié par Esker02, 09 avril 2012 - 06:11 .