Olueq wrote...
I doubt this would still even be the case after the geth side with the reapers. When you are on the dreadnaught it is clearly Gerrel that is forcing them.Aramina wrote...
Olueq wrote...
Thats not true at all. The majority dont want to fight. The entire civilian fleet was forced to.Aramina wrote...
That's assuming the Quarians wanted peace. Which at this point they've made pretty clear they don't. The ones advocating it are in the minority, and at this point Shepard doesn't have enough pull with the fleet to demand they listen. In the end, the geth were forced into a corner, and fighting was the only way out.
I was talking about Tali's loyalty mission in ME2. At that point, if you urge them to fight the geth, one of the admirals (I believe it is Koris) will say "You urged our people to war. For all our sakes, I hope they do not listen. But I fear I am in the minority." It was this statement I was using to base my "majority" claims on.
I'm not disputing that, my argument was for another topic entirely; if Legion should have tried to make peace with the Quarians in ME2 if you bring him along on Tali's loyalty mission. In ME3 it does seem like Gerrel is the driving force behind the war, but even so, it is made pretty obvious that most of the Quarians still do not want peace. Look at what happens if you do make peace between the two. The Geth were not firing on the fleet, and one of the Primes is walking up to Shep's party with no weapons drawn. Very first thing Tali does? Point her gun at it. And she was the only Quarian that had ever worked closely with a Geth. Just imagine the rest of them who had never seen geth like Legion.
EDIT: Probably should have said, "do not trust the Geth" rather than "do not want peace," but in the end it amounts to the same thing. Shoot first, ask questions later.
Modifié par Aramina, 10 avril 2012 - 01:12 .





Retour en haut





