4stringwizard wrote...
My apologies beforehand for the long post...
It feels like most people, if forced to choose, decided to wipe out the Quarians rather than the Geth during the Rannoch. Which is fine and dandy by me cause it's your choice, but it's not as if it's done cause it's paragon/renegade. The main reason given by most people seems to be:
1. The Quarians are genocidal maniacs and had it coming.
2. The Geth are just innocent victims in all this.
Really? Although I'm not very surprised since Bioware tried their darnest to paint the Geth as helpless victims in ME3, I still don't understand the amount of bias towards the Geth in this case. First off,
1. The Quarians weren't "genocidal maniacs". They tried to reclaim their home world. For crying out loud people, wouldn't you have done the same thing? Beside, not all Quarians supported the war or the first "Morning War." And they were attacing machines. I repeat, MACHINES. Whether the Geth were alive/sentient at the end is moot, but the game makes it clear that the Geth didn't achieve sentience until after they got the Reaper upgrades. Even if they were alive/sentient, the Quarians wouldn't have known this. For all they knew at the time, the Geth were just machines still. Speaking of Reapers...
2. The Geth weren't "innocent" in all this. They sided with the Reapers not once, but TWICE over the course of the trilogy. Yeah, the first ones to side were the "heretics", but even still, they were once true Geth. if they could turn, why couldn't the true Geth? At best, this shows the Geth to be untrustworthy. As far as ME3, even if the Geth were desparate, they sided with the Reapers knowing full well what their intentions were. Nobody is even bothered by this? Again, this shows the Geth to be untrustworthy. What would have stopped them from waging war against organics later to better themselves?
3. Another pro-Geth argument I've heard is that the Geth were peaceful and let the Quarians live during the first war, when they had to chance to pursue them or wipe them out. Well, Legion himself says the ONLY reason the Geth didn't wipe out the Quarians was because they weren't smart enough to make that decision at the time. Even during the game, Legion basically admits to Shepard that the Geth aren't any better than organics. (This occurs after Shepard finds out that Legion had his something from him.) The Geth wouldn't have been more useful. The Quarians had the largest fleet in the galaxy and the Geth were weakened if they had been destroyed rather than re-written.
So again, I don't understand the sheer amount of bias toward the Geth in this case. If you ask me, they were no better allies than the Quarians (maybe worse given the circumstances). Thoughts?
first off OP, good post, a fair change from what normally is on these forums.
As far as the geth/quarian conflict, I would choose neither, and I did. I didn't like the fact that the game was about to have you choose between these two great and noble races.
the "Choice" is the same kind of false paradigm that you are offered in the end. I think allowing the quarians to kill the geth is wrong, I think allowing the geth to kill the quarians is wrong, and the whole point is about coexistance and unity of diverse people.
The geth always had sentience, the reaper upgrade in fact proved it, it artificially sped up an evolution that was always there,, without the reaper upgrades the geth would of reached that point regardless.
The Quarians refused to ackknowledge this fact, and thought of the geth as nothing more then tools, and machines for tasks, however as shown in the consensus, some Quarians realized what was going on.
The geth build consensus, but just because some or all of a group of people agree to it, doesn't make it right, it should be right or wrong on it's own merits.
when the geth CHOSE not to continue chasing the Quarians into space they showed a moral choice, maybe backed up by machine logic. IE. chose not to kill them, and corroborated it with saying, Plus it would use up to many resources anyway.
Mass Effect's people, cultures and races, were all trapped in different cycles of one or another, more then just the Reaper cycle. The Quarians/ Geth, Krogan/Turian/Salarian. All trapped in cycles
Cycles of pain, of death, distrust, guilt and anguish, destruction, chaos, oppression, tyranny and outright evil.
I played as a Paragon Shepard, made a couple renagade moves, minor ones. But I figured my Shepard was out to break the cycles, all of them, and set the right path.
I wanted to cure the genophage, because it was right, and because it freed the krogan BUT ALSO the Salarians and Turians, because even the jailer becomes trapped in the cycle as well. I alliviated that cycle.
I stopped the Quarian/Geth war because it was right and stopped their viscious cycle of pain and death.
And in every case, I made sure that these weren't situations in which there was a "Winner" and a "Loser" because the cycles are fed by pain and only will exhaust themselves in blood.
the key wasn't winning or losing, but making each side realize they were contributing to a cycle that has gone on so long, that the need, the reason for it had become long forgotten or twisted and lost.
I will end this post in the prophetic and wise words of Kosh Narenek from Babylon 5, in the form of an excerpt from one of my favorite episodes:
Kosh: We are a dying people, G'Kar. So are the Centauri.
[We see him,
standing behind G'Kar: an older Narn, not G'Kar's father.]Obsessed with each other's death until death is all we can see and death
is all we deserve.
G'Kar: The Centauri started it.
Kosh: And will you continue, until there are no more Narns, and no more
Centauri? If both sides are dead, no one will care which side deserves
the blame. It no longer matters who started it, G'Kar. It only matters
who is suffering.
G'Kar: No. No, I have an obligation to honor my father's name.
Kosh: And how have you chosen to honor that name? What is there left for Narn
if all of creation falls around us?
There is nothing. No hope, no dream,
no future, no life. Unless we turn from the cycle of death toward
something greater. If we are a dying people, then let us die with honor,
by helping the others as no one else can.
G'Kar: I don't understand.
Kosh: Because you have let them distract you. Blind you with hate. You
cannot see the battle for what it is. We are fighting to save one another.
We must realize we are not alone. We rise and fall together. And some of us
must be sacrificed if all are to be saved. Because if you fail in this then
none of us will be saved, and the Narn will be only a memory.
[Vanishes.]You have the opportunity here and now to choose, to become something
greater and nobler and more difficult than you have been before. The
universe does not offer such chances often, G'Kar.
G'Kar: Why now? Why not earlier? All this time, where have you been?
Kosh: I have always been here.
-AE
Modifié par Exeider, 09 avril 2012 - 11:32 .