Leafs43 wrote...
You're the one making it like object rho was a giant bomb when no where it was said, stated or even hinted at. That is retconning.
Actually, the point was made nobody knew what the hell Object Rho was. All that was known about it was,
1. It had kinetic barriers and mass effect fields strong enough to foil any known scanning technology.
2. It broadcasted some kind of signal. Part of that signal was an indoctrination signal, as is the case with most, if not all, active Reaper tech.
Focus on "nobody knew what Object Rho was". Again, filling in gaps of knowledge is not retconning. Changing established lore is. Quit bandying about the term when you can't even use it yourself properly even when the very definition of it is handed right to you.
Modifié par humes spork, 10 avril 2012 - 12:11 .





Retour en haut




