Ratham wrote...
Krogan vanguard only, no weapons, only biotic charge, FINAL DESTINATION.
Fixed.
Ratham wrote...
Krogan vanguard only, no weapons, only biotic charge, FINAL DESTINATION.
Highlord Heian wrote...
Sorry couldn't hear you over the resounding failure of all of your responses.
I saw exactly 0 thoughtful input from you all thread. You expected others to explain why PvP shouldn't exist, but apparently didn't feel obligated to make any mention as to how it should possibly be implemented. You didn't develop an idea, you had nothing but a vague, completely original thought and immediately posted it.
I invite you to point out anywhere that a meaningful argument for PvP was ever presented in this thread. Anything with actual thought and form put into it to convey viability and execution. Go right ahead.
Drummernate wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Sorry couldn't hear you over the resounding failure of all of your responses.
I saw exactly 0 thoughtful input from you all thread. You expected others to explain why PvP shouldn't exist, but apparently didn't feel obligated to make any mention as to how it should possibly be implemented. You didn't develop an idea, you had nothing but a vague, completely original thought and immediately posted it.
I invite you to point out anywhere that a meaningful argument for PvP was ever presented in this thread. Anything with actual thought and form put into it to convey viability and execution. Go right ahead.
Someone......
Someone.... just got told!
Highlord Heian wrote...
Lastswarm wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
MissMinaethiel wrote...
You know, your rudeness is incomprehensibly dumb in and of itself. Do you need to insult everyone that has an idea you don't like? Granted both sides have been lobbing insults everywhere but every post you've made is just flat out demeaning and unhelpful to the debate.
Unhelpful to the "debate"? This wasn't a "debate". The "for pvp" side didn't meaningful arguments or any point that was put across in a thoughtful way. It was "PvE is for ******" and "Not agreeing with PvP is ****gotry." This wasn't an intellectual discussion, this was a rehash of the same stupid threads about the same stupid topic.
You know what's rude? Posting the same thread over and over. You know what's rude? People throwing a half-baked argument at somebody's well-thought-out, point-by-point analysis. I feel bad for the people who made good, solid arguments, because the slack-jawed, half-witted responses complete detract from any actual, meaningful discussion.
Bias - learn what it is my cute little cuddly friend.Lastswarm wrote...
Enjoy killing helpless A.I. over 1000 scripted encounters. I've seen the
elitism coming from the multiplayer's forum and it left me a little
speechless. I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Sorry couldn't hear you over the resounding failure of all of your responses.
I saw exactly 0 thoughtful input from you all thread. You expected others to explain why PvP shouldn't exist, but apparently didn't feel obligated to make any mention as to how it should possibly be implemented. You didn't develop an idea, you had nothing but a vague, completely original thought and immediately posted it.
I invite you to point out anywhere that a meaningful argument for PvP was ever presented in this thread. Anything with actual thought and form put into it to convey viability and execution. Go right ahead.
Modifié par Ratham, 10 avril 2012 - 02:19 .
Modifié par wolfstanus, 10 avril 2012 - 02:19 .
Modifié par fixit6, 10 avril 2012 - 02:20 .