We need a pvp mode
#26
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:12
its stepping stones just be glad they finally added MP to a game like this. im sure they had to streamline a lot in SP just so they could give us coop.
#27
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:13
Lastswarm wrote...
There is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
Enjoy killing helpless A.I. over 1000 scripted encounters. I've seen the elitism coming from the multiplayer's forum and it left me a little speechless. I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Your stupidity leaves me a little speechless. If you think "hurr durr pvp" just works by adding the option for it, you must be the most short-sighted individual. Your ignorance is astounding.
If you don't like the current multiplayer, you DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
#28
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:13
Secondly, it is not laziness to omit PvP. Personally, I'm glad to have a game without it that is still replayable. OP, I would LOVE to see you lay out a PvP scenario that is entertaining, balanced, and replayable. Oh, and it must include all the classes since generic this vs this gets boring after a while.
Third, PvP spawns bigger egos than rank. I want those types to stay in CoD and other such games where they belong.
#29
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:14
#30
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:15
#31
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:15
Lastswarm wrote...
Non-competitive with a leaderboard - I just can't get enaugh from you guys.
He can't get enaugh, you guys.
Can you not get enaugh school, either?
#32
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:16
Lionheartwolf wrote...
you do know that there is only so much space on a disc as it is right? im pretty sure they didnt exclude it because it was 'too hard' you do realize that they were on the "dont add MP to a great SP wagon" until this game.
its stepping stones just be glad they finally added MP to a game like this. im sure they had to streamline a lot in SP just so they could give us coop.
They certainly streamlined the ending.
*rimshot*
#33
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:16
Cyonan wrote..
Competitive doesn't always equal PvP, nor does co-operative need to equal PvE.
Can't agree with that at all but I think a discussion of the merits of the four terms would be going slightly off topic. :-)
#34
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:17
Highlord Heian wrote...
Lastswarm wrote...
There is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
Enjoy killing helpless A.I. over 1000 scripted encounters. I've seen the elitism coming from the multiplayer's forum and it left me a little speechless. I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Your stupidity leaves me a little speechless. If you think "hurr durr pvp" just works by adding the option for it, you must be the most short-sighted individual. Your ignorance is astounding.
If you don't like the current multiplayer, you DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
No need for personal insults my dear friend. I know it's a lot of work to implent that's why Bioware is too lazy to do it. It would be awesome - but I guess you guys are so afraid of changes. It's human nature after all - I can't hold a grudge.
#35
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:18
are you sure we are playing the same thing?
#36
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:19
Stenun wrote...
Cyonan wrote..
Competitive doesn't always equal PvP, nor does co-operative need to equal PvE.
Can't agree with that at all but I think a discussion of the merits of the four terms would be going slightly off topic. :-)
Probably
But at least we seem to agree that PvP shouldn't be in the game =P
#37
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:20
Fresh Bamboo wrote...
Charge/Nova = Winner.
Infiltrator Cloak + Sniping = Winner.
Stasis = Winner.
Lift = Winner
Cryo Blast = Winner
Soldiers: Q_Q
#38
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:21
Lastswarm wrote...
But there is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT. The only reason we don't have a pvp mode is laziness from the developpers to try and balance classes over a pvp mindset. It's too hard. Better try to make money off ridiculous unnecessary dlc content.
No we dont. Did you ever try balancing lets say a vanguard? He s invulnerable most of the time as long as his spells arent on cd
what about the infiltrator? one shot everything . remove that and he becomes useless.
Also
Fresh Bamboo wrote...
Charge/Nova = Winner.
Infiltrator Cloak + Sniping = Winner.
Stasis = Winner.
Lift = Winner
Cryo Blast = Winner
#39
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:24
Go play something else.
#40
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:24
#41
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:26
It wouldn't make sense,Galaxy going to hell and all species beating each other up?
You want PvP, play something else.
#42
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:27
You need to do it in such a way that; both classes would remain playable, still retain their unique qualities, would still be Mass Effect and not interchangeable with any generic shooter, and would not result in one class compeltely dominating the other.
#43
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:27
Lastswarm wrote...
I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Lastswarm wrote...
No need for personal insults my dear friend.
Lol.
Amazing lack of self-awareness.
#44
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:28
#45
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:30
Lastswarm wrote...
But there is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT. The only reason we don't have a pvp mode is laziness from the developpers to try and balance classes over a pvp mindset. It's too hard. Better try to make money off ridiculous unnecessary dlc content.
Lastswarm wrote...
There is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
Enjoy killing helpless A.I. over 1000 scripted encounters. I've seen the elitism coming from the multiplayer's forum and it left me a little speechless. I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Lastswarm wrote...
Also - I'm so sorry you didn't even get it was already being competitive even vs A.I. So sad.
Hey, guess who is the Elitist on these forums? It's you.

I also love how you call the devs lazy because they won't work on something that clearly isn't meant to work with what they intended.
Modifié par Kantham, 09 avril 2012 - 11:36 .
#46
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:30
No. It's common intelligence.Lastswarm wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Lastswarm wrote...
There is a catch. People who don't want it. DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
Enjoy killing helpless A.I. over 1000 scripted encounters. I've seen the elitism coming from the multiplayer's forum and it left me a little speechless. I've never seen a community with so much ****gotry in it.
Your stupidity leaves me a little speechless. If you think "hurr durr pvp" just works by adding the option for it, you must be the most short-sighted individual. Your ignorance is astounding.
If you don't like the current multiplayer, you DON'T HAVE TO PLAY IT.
No need for personal insults my dear friend. I know it's a lot of work to implent that's why Bioware is too lazy to do it. It would be awesome - but I guess you guys are so afraid of changes. It's human nature after all - I can't hold a grudge.
Bioware, along with everyone else in this thread, realizes that PvP would be a folly and a complete waste of time, and resources.
People tend to gravitate towards the more intelligent answer, it's human nature. But I can't hold a grudge.
#47
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:30
#48
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:31
#50
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:32
Aaperture wrote...
People tend to gravitate towards the more intelligent answer, it's human nature.
Are you being serious?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






