280 réponses à ce sujet

[mCmuFFeL]

agreed, ME1 with ME3 gameplay would be great!

[karlchen]

I agree, OP!

Logical as a customer I assumend that logically the glitches and problems will be fixed and even made better in a future succsessor. Instead they told us, what customers want, made some more action orienteded gameplay, cutted down rpg (which was very important for immersive story support).

ME2 was good. But only because they had the luck of balancing this with the IMHO very good loyalty Missions, strong chracters again and IMHO the Para/Rene-Options while the dialogues are running.

ME3 just failed there nearly completely even I had some fun with it. (the first 80 - 90 %).

So my favorites are ME1 > ME 2 > ME 3... so sad to see.
Same impression with the DA-Series.
It seems that you only can buy BW/EA-Games if they introduce a new brand... after this.. cash cow rules!

Just my very own impression!!!

Modifié par karlchen, 10 avril 2012 - 11:16 .

[Vigil_N7]

Gameplay wise, ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Story wise: ME3 > ME1 > ME2
Personal entertainment: ME3= ME2 = ME1

As far as the series go, it kept getting better and I enjoyed all three games just as much. No way I could say ME1 was the best in the series though.

[YonatanJ]

Mass Effect 2 is absolutetly the best in my point of view. It was generally got me replaying it tons of times because there are just so many characters to explore and interact with.

[dbt-kenny]

yes i do like ME1 the best out of the 3 games.

[Someguyukno]

I love ME1 and I always will, but I believe that Mass Effect 2 had a better story. It was all focused on preparing for the suicide mission, and almost every side quest played a part in that preparation. Completing what some said was impossible with everyone coming out alive and riding the explosion into the stars was the highlight of the entire trilogy. I'd screwed up harbinger's plans, destroyed the Collectors and everyone was alive. I felt like a big god damn hero. Plus, great characters, and my favorite characters from ME1 returned as well.

Also, less turian councilor. Always a plus.

[SimplePlan2k8]

Yeah ME1 is the best. Best story, best lore and the Mako

[Seival]

IntoTheDarkness wrote...
Does anyone else think ME1 is the best game in the trilogy?

...I don't think so. ME1 was good as prologue and game's prototype. Don't get me wrong, I completed ME1 many times, but still don't think the game was very good.

ME2 is where the ME truely begins... So it was very good idea to make interactive comic for players, who want to recreate ME1 story without actually playing ME1.

Modifié par Seival, 10 avril 2012 - 11:22 .

[B3ckett]

I like them the way they came.
ME1 was a shocker and a great story.
ME2 was all about great characters with a story lost because of ME3's solutions, not it's own quality.
ME3 was great on moments, but too often felt rushed. ME1&ME2 didn't leave such feeling in the mouth.

[Joccaren]

ME1 was the best. No question.

[die-yng]

I would assume that the people who like ME1 best are the more fanatical rpg players and the people who like the latter games are more of the shooter or causal gmae rkind.

True or wrong assumption?

[Twinzam.V]

die-yng wrote...

I would assume that the people who like ME1 best are the more fanatical rpg players and the people who like the latter games are more of the shooter or causal gmae rkind.

True or wrong assumption?

I loved ME1 and in my case is true, i cant wait for "Legend of Grimrock".

[jimihenrix]

me1 was the best, me3 would have been a close tie, but the it was Fd by the ending

[william.munden]

yes

[Fail_Inc]

Well for me,
ME1 had better "main" story
ME2 had better characters (and it was about characters too) and managed to keep the hype alive
ME3 had better "HOLY **** BLOWING UP STUFF IS FUN" combat and emotional scenes

[whitey4444]

ME1 had the best story. There really was a feel and scope to it that wasn't matched in the last 2.

ME2 had the best character interactions. The story was strong by itself, but didn't connect much with the first one. It did also have the most satisfactory conclusion of the three, even though there were really only two similar endings (which shows, it's not the number but the execution).

ME3 was doing a decent job in wrapping things up until you landed back on Earth. I think they didn't push the barrow out far enough though, a lot was similar to ME2. It did beat even ME1 for good mission environments though, Palaven's moon was just fantastic.

See, each had something good going for it. I can't really pick a best though, because they all have one major flaw which can't push them above the others. The first one was the clunky inventory interface, the second was the general disconnect in the story to the other two, and the third one was Priority: Earth and starchild.

[FSOAH]

Story-wise? Definately
If you look at the whole picture? No, both 2 and 3 have a lot of strengths that weigh up for the medium stories.

[Acidrain92]

Vigil_N7 wrote...

Gameplay wise, ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Story wise: ME3 > ME1 > ME2
Personal entertainment: ME3= ME2 = ME1

As far as the series go, it kept getting better and I enjoyed all three games just as much. No way I could say ME1 was the best in the series though.

This pretty much. I'd say ME2 and ME1 are on the same level seeing as how ME2 seriously improved on everything (gameplay, dialogue, side missions, emotional impact, style, etc) aside from RPG elements and story. Where as ME1 was the exact opposite, although its RPG elements really werent all that great to start with.

ME3 I'd say improved on both ME1 and 2 aside from the ending. The auto-dialogue and Kasumi/Zaeed dialogue with teammates is actually an improvement to me. And the DLC char dialogue is there in the first place to fill up the moments where your team mates wouldnt be saying anything different in the first place anyway.

whitey4444 wrote...

ME1 had the best story. There really was a feel and scope to it that wasn't matched in the last 2.

ME2 had the best character interactions. The story was strong by itself, but didn't connect much with the first one. It did also have the most satisfactory conclusion of the three, even though there were really only two similar endings (which shows, it's not the number but the execution).

ME3 was doing a decent job in wrapping things up until you landed back on Earth. I think they didn't push the barrow out far enough though, a lot was similar to ME2. It did beat even ME1 for good mission environments though, Palaven's moon was just fantastic.

See, each had something good going for it. I can't really pick a best though, because they all have one major flaw which can't push them above the others. The first one was the clunky inventory interface, the second was the general disconnect in the story to the other two, and the third one was Priority: Earth and starchild.

agreed. Palaven was my favorite place to fight in in the game. That was an amazing mission environment.

Modifié par Acidrain92, 10 avril 2012 - 03:18 .

[Dead_Meat357]

Me1 is great because it's the first one. But gameplay wise I think it's the worst. The Citadel quests are boring, the Mako driving sucks, the combat mechanics are bad. ME2 was worlds better in this regard and ME3 is a minor improvement over ME2. ME3 would be the greatest game in the series were it not for the terrible final act.

[Necroscope]

ME1>ME2>ME3

[Xyrm]

ME1 had the best story, ME3 had the best gameplay, ME2 was somewhere in between in both.

[elaf000]

Fail_Inc wrote...

Well for me,
ME1 had better "main" story
ME2 had better characters (and it was about characters too) and managed to keep the hype alive
ME3 had better "HOLY **** BLOWING UP STUFF IS FUN" combat and emotional scenes

Same for me

[Buzz the Fuzz]

For me Mass Effect 2 was the best because the gameplay was better, there you wouldn't have 20 of the same weapon or upgrade and the character development in the story was better. The story wasn't as good as the first one's but it was still good IMO. I did love Mass Effect 3 though however, I was dissapointed with the ending which brought it down to joint second with 1.

[Bebuse]

Mass Effect's clunky gameplay and controls (as well as poor PC optimisation, I can run ME3 smoothly but chug on ME1...eh?) are the only things stopping it being my favourite game ever.

Sure, ME2 had tighter combat, better inventory and more interesting environments. Sure, ME3 had more emotion-tugging moments and even better combat.

But ME2 was shafted by a plot that felt suffered from being the middle child, and became far too much "recruitment, check, conversation a, check loyalty, check, conversation b, check." between the main missions. And ME3's ending... need I say more.

Mass Effect has a... magic to it that the other two just cannot match. I can't put my finger on exactly what it is: maybe the discovery of a new Galaxy, the feeling of bigness, the plot which actually feels mysterious while making sense, and progresses at a decent rate, the far more minimal soundtrack, I don't know. I love turning the difficulty down to easy mode and just drinking it all in.

[ardias89]

It did have the best villain and the guns sounded awesome!