139 réponses à ce sujet

[Davillo]

If there is Multilayer it's gotta be like BG and......... you guys have to make a game controller option for the PC also so my buddy can sit beside me drinking beer n smokin blunts and killing stuff.

[Rixkey]

As long as I don't have to pay a monthly fee for a mode I'm never going to use and the MP has absolutely nothing to do with SP? I don't care. I don't like MP at all, especially for a game like DA, but I'm not going to spurn Bioware for including it as long as it isn't forced on me.

[PinkShoes]

The reason many people are worried and they have a right to be worried is because DA2 was an average game at best. It was so obviously rushed, even if you liked the game you cant disagree with the fact it was a rushed game. So if you add MP then it is taking away from the SP experience that everyone plays DA for! They play it for the story, who honestly picked up DAO and said "well the story was forgeable but the combat! WOW!" Even those who really really hated DA2 only hate it with such a passion because they loved DAO so much and they did want DA2 they do want the franchise to do well.

Honestly, the MP might be good, bad whatever. But i still its the wrong move. Its not reassuring their main fanbase its making them more worried and convinced that DA3 will be a bad game, so while i think being innovated and moving forward is incredibly important in games i don't think they should do things that could potentially drive away their fanbase after they are still so angry DA2 wasn't good. Also, ME3 has been having so much trouble and EA to. I just don't think its the time to be doing something that honestly i don't think many want.

[wsandista]

If it's completely optional, does not effect the sp at all, and functions close to what NWN had then go ahead, if not then don't do it.

[DeadPoolX]

PinkShoes wrote...

So if you add MP then it is taking away from the SP experience that everyone plays DA for!

Not if one division is assigned to SP and another to MP.  So long as the same division doesn't work on both, there shouldn't be any time and enery taken away from SP to create MP.

[PinkShoes]

DeadPoolMK wrote...

PinkShoes wrote...

So if you add MP then it is taking away from the SP experience that everyone plays DA for!

Not if one division is assigned to SP and another to MP.  So long as the same division doesn't work on both, there shouldn't be any time and enery taken away from SP to create MP.

But that MP divison could be working on something to make the SP better.

[Wulfram]

I'd rather not have multiplayer. And I'd really rather not have it get entangled with SP campaign like in ME3

[DeadPoolX]

PinkShoes wrote...

DeadPoolMK wrote...

PinkShoes wrote...

So if you add MP then it is taking away from the SP experience that everyone plays DA for!

Not if one division is assigned to SP and another to MP.  So long as the same division doesn't work on both, there shouldn't be any time and enery taken away from SP to create MP.

But that MP divison could be working on something to make the SP better.

Quite possibly.  Although it's also just as possible that the division working on MP wouldn't be doing anything on DA3 at all if no multiplayer component exists.

[Arppis]

As long as it's story co-op. Let's say the player characters are siblings? Wouldn't that be great? They could do the coversations like they did in SWTOR.

[maglalosus]

ShadowAussie wrote...

dont make multiplayer in dragon age 3

NO don't ! Just give use DA origins with a new story!

[Esbatty]

After seeing how much fun I'm having with ME3's MP, I would not be adverse to DA having MP. But I'm curious as to how it would be done.

[Faerloch]

Multiplayer seems like it would be extremely difficult to implement, as wouldn't everyone be playing similar characters? There is only so much that Dragon Age can provide as personal backstory before we all start tripping over each other claiming to be the rightful Cousland or Amell heir, etc. Especially with the pace DA games are played at, I certainly don't want to embark on a four hour quest and rely on someone else. Still a cool idea though.

Of course Faerloch Cousland, Hero of Ferelden who disappeared with Morrigan is the canon. DUH...so there's no argument there.

[Arppis]

Faerloch wrote...

Multiplayer seems like it would be extremely difficult to implement, as wouldn't everyone be playing similar characters? There is only so much that Dragon Age can provide as personal backstory before we all start tripping over each other claiming to be the rightful Cousland or Amell heir, etc. Especially with the pace DA games are played at, I certainly don't want to embark on a four hour quest and rely on someone else. Still a cool idea though.

Of course Faerloch Cousland, Hero of Ferelden who disappeared with Morrigan is the canon. DUH...so there's no argument there.

Just make the characters have same origin story, just make them related and BANG! Done.

And sure, why not have a bit of conflict between characters?

[DeadPoolX]

The background for MP wouldn't be that difficult, really. In DA3 MP, you wouldn't be anyone of any great importance, just a "normal" Warrior, Mage or Rogue.

Here's an example:

• (Human, Elf or Dwarf) Warrior: Champion, Reaver, Templar, Berserker, Spirit Warrior, Guardian
• (Human or Elf) Mage: Elementalist, Healer, Battle Mage, Force Mage, Blood Mage, Keeper.
• (Human, Elf or Dwarf) Rogue: Assassin, Ranger, Duelist, Shadow, Legionaire Scout, Bard.

I left out Arcane Warrior because it might make Mages and Warriors overlap too much.  As is, I think this gives more than enough specializations.

Maybe after leveling up a certain amount, you could gain Grey Warden status. I'm not sure what that'd entail, but it's something to consider.

Modifié par DeadPoolMK, 14 avril 2012 - 02:56 .

[PinkShoes]

DeadPoolMK wrote...

PinkShoes wrote...

DeadPoolMK wrote...

PinkShoes wrote...

So if you add MP then it is taking away from the SP experience that everyone plays DA for!

Not if one division is assigned to SP and another to MP.  So long as the same division doesn't work on both, there shouldn't be any time and enery taken away from SP to create MP.

But that MP divison could be working on something to make the SP better.

Quite possibly.  Although it's also just as possible that the division working on MP wouldn't be doing anything on DA3 at all if no multiplayer component exists.

I just find it weird that Bioware keeps saying they are listening to us and but then they add MP? More people dont want it. And ya know it could be good but if the SP falls short at a certain point people will insantly blame the MP.

Its so annoying because not every game needs MP and this game doesnt need it. Some games should just be MP, and i bet you there will be some kinect BS adverts that will dirve MORE people away.

[wsandista]

Arppis wrote...

Faerloch wrote...

Multiplayer seems like it would be extremely difficult to implement, as wouldn't everyone be playing similar characters? There is only so much that Dragon Age can provide as personal backstory before we all start tripping over each other claiming to be the rightful Cousland or Amell heir, etc. Especially with the pace DA games are played at, I certainly don't want to embark on a four hour quest and rely on someone else. Still a cool idea though.

Of course Faerloch Cousland, Hero of Ferelden who disappeared with Morrigan is the canon. DUH...so there's no argument there.

Just make the characters have same origin story, just make them related and BANG! Done.

And sure, why not have a bit of conflict between characters?

What about mages? If you have 20% of people playing as mages thats alot of apostates just walking around.

They need to make a good single-player game first.

[Nyctyris]

Well, I have no problem as multiplayer, but maybe not on release? as in all resources go to the single player game, with MP being released as a DLC later on or something.

[Spydi Kassell]

As long as the SP doesnt get hurt by it. Just put the MP on another disc and have some pvp and pve.

[Davillo]

Watch them put in multilayer so people have to buy the game so that their ending is not gibbed like. For example final confrontation with the attacking Quanari flotilla if you have not played multilayer you barely survive and the ending blows. HA

[Spydi Kassell]

Lets hope not.

[Dakota Strider]

Unlike some, what attracted me to NwN1 was the Official Solo Campaign, not the multiplayer. The mp is what extended NwN's life, and gave Bioware lots of time in creating sequels to it.

IF DA goes to multiplayer, it cannot be at expense of the solo experience. There had better not be things added to the MP game at release, that you are unable to find in the solo campaign. And anything you do while in MP, cannot have an affect on the solo campaign. Events that occur in MP need to be treated like they are in alternate realities, and can have no affect on future DA campaigns.

[Uriko128]

 I would love to have multiplayer on DA3. But please, ADD DEATHMATCH !!

[schalafi]

The only multiplayer I've ever played was Guild Wars, and while it was interesting for a while, I just didn't like it as much as single player games. If there is a DA3 multiplayer, please have it be completely separate from the single player game.  I've been with Bioware games since BG, but I don't like the way things seem to be going lately. A  mp DA3 would just about finish my long history with Bioware.

Modifié par schalafi, 18 avril 2012 - 01:33 .