209 réponses à ce sujet

[StElmo]

More getting swept up in negativity, I am dissapointed in myself, Sorry BioWare have a great day

Modifié par StElmo, 30 janvier 2013 - 01:14 .

[GnusmasTHX]

Except it's not real.

It's also unlikely to be implemented because now people can claim it was theirs. Then lawsuits happen.

Then they'll make a movie out of the lawsuit.

Modifié par GnusmasTHX, 11 avril 2012 - 01:56 .

[evisneffo]

StElmo wrote...

Does anyone know if bioware have confirmed it?

They've neither confirmed nor denied, and I doubt they ever will.

[EricHVela]

Indoc theory is based completely on the rushed, sloppy part of the ending.

Pointing out rushed and sloppy work as proof forgets that rushed and sloppy work lacks intent to create the situation.

[StElmo]

evisneffo wrote...

StElmo wrote...

Does anyone know if bioware have confirmed it?

They've neither confirmed nor denied, and I doubt they ever will.

Thats ok, I guess, but I just want the ending to be logical. I dont even care about choices and stuff that much. Just need some logic. I liked the feel of the ending, just wanted logic :3

[Hajilestone]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

It's also unlikely to be implemented because now people can claim it was theirs. Then lawsuits happen.

Then they'll make a movie out of the lawsuit.

 
you can't claim you made up a story in someone else's game. That person would get sued, not Bioware.

[The Harmonizer]

They will probably never confirm or deny it, since it's a nice "joker" to have for a future game/DLC

[Drake-Shepard]

welcome to the rollercoaster some of us indoc fans have been experiencing.

That video. This super detailed google documents
https://docs.google....?pli=1&sle=true

Tweets from mike gamble saying we don't know what's in store....

Followed by cryptic defensive statements from BW, rumours of a previous full blow indoctrination being taken out of the game due to difficulties. Then the multiplayer dlc.

Hope has just been eroded for me over the last 4 weeks.

..but just pretend indoc theory is real. makes me feel happy. I will make up fanfiction in my head about what happens when you beat the indoc and get up from the rubble

Modifié par Drake-Shepard, 11 avril 2012 - 02:03 .

[rachellouise]

Yeah amazing how things can be made of nothing..none of the experiences of indoctrination, written/described in datapads etc. actually apply to Shepard.

it amazes me that one person's 'evidence' that /Shepard/ was being indoctrinated, was /Vega/ saying /he/ heard a humming

[GnusmasTHX]

Hajilestone wrote...

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

It's also unlikely to be implemented because now people can claim it was theirs. Then lawsuits happen.

Then they'll make a movie out of the lawsuit.

 
you can't claim you made up a story in someone else's game. That person would get sued, not Bioware.

Doesn't stop creators from worrying about it.

Also the comic industry worries about just that.

[PhotonMaze]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

Are you serious?? Supporters of the IT in no way say it's definately true. Personally, I think that it's a likely possibility because there is a lot of evidence for it.

However, the people who don't believe it always seem to be so arrogant and full of themselves that they won't even accept that it's a possibilty. Why don't you wait and find out!

[EricHVela]

Indoc theory is based completely on the rushed, sloppy part of the ending.

Pointing out rushed and sloppy work as proof forgets that rushed and sloppy work lacks intent to create the situation. It's only coincidental and proves nothing else.

[Drake-Shepard]

@rachellouise
it's is perfectly fine to feel IT is not true. But don;t pick the weakest argument of IT theory and use that as your basis. I personally don;t care for that 'hum' dialogue. There are much stronger arguments which are difficult to pass off as 'coincidence' and 'bad writing'

[GnusmasTHX]

PhotonMaze wrote...

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

Are you serious?? Supporters of the IT in no way say it's definately true. Personally, I think that it's a likely possibility because there is a lot of evidence for it.

However, the people who don't believe it always seem to be so arrogant and full of themselves that they won't even accept that it's a possibilty. Why don't you wait and find out!

There is remarkably little to support it, if you gave it some real thought that you might be capable of if the whole issue hasn't so clouded your judgement.

You seem to think I don't want it to be. I do, but little of the stuff in the video is evidence and it's clear from the business in the real world that it's not going to happen.

Even if they did implement IT, which I'd like them to, they'd need to revise a whole lot more than just the ending to avoid creating even more errors.

[PhotonMaze]

ReggarBlane wrote...

Indoc theory is based completely on the rushed, sloppy part of the ending.

Pointing out rushed and sloppy work as proof forgets that rushed and sloppy work lacks intent to create the situation. It's only coincidental and proves nothing else.

A lot of the minor peices of evidence for the IT seem a bit far fetched. However, you can't ignore stuff like Shepard's breath at the end and the cryptic way that the developers have been acting.

[rachellouise]

Drake-Shepard wrote...

@rachellouise
it's is perfectly fine to feel IT is not true. But don;t pick the weakest argument of IT theory and use that as your basis. I personally don;t care for that 'hum' dialogue. There are much stronger arguments which are difficult to pass off as 'coincidence' and 'bad writing'

I was just pointing out the ridiculous point someone had for it, to illustrate the level some people will argue  it. I mean, that argument isn't even a straw.

Modifié par rachellouise, 11 avril 2012 - 02:11 .

[lil_lene]

I hope it is true also, however it looks unlikely..

[PhotonMaze]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

PhotonMaze wrote...

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

Are you serious?? Supporters of the IT in no way say it's definately true. Personally, I think that it's a likely possibility because there is a lot of evidence for it.

However, the people who don't believe it always seem to be so arrogant and full of themselves that they won't even accept that it's a possibilty. Why don't you wait and find out!

There is remarkably little to support it, if you gave it some real thought that you might be capable of if the whole issue hasn't so clouded your judgement.

You seem to think I don't want it to be. I do, but little of the stuff in the video is evidence and it's clear from the business in the real world that it's not going to happen.

Even if they did implement IT, which I'd like them to, they'd need to revise a whole lot more than just the ending to avoid creating even more errors.

I think there is a lot to support it.. There are other threads for that though. I was simply saying that you shouldn't be so sure of yourself. You might not believe it, but that doesn't make it not true. Just as me believing in it doesn't make it true..

[GnusmasTHX]

Well seeing as how I'm right, there's no harm in being so sure of myself.

[PhotonMaze]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Well seeing as how I'm right, there's no harm in being so sure of myself.

You've just lost.

[GnusmasTHX]

PhotonMaze wrote...

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Well seeing as how I'm right, there's no harm in being so sure of myself.

You've just lost.

There wasn't a competition.

[Drake-Shepard]

it was a competition. You have lost. IT is now absolute

[GnusmasTHX]

Drake-Shepard wrote...

it was a competition. You have lost. IT is now absolute

So does that mean I win the whole tournament come the EC DLC?

[Galifreya]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

Except it's not real.

It's also unlikely to be implemented because now people can claim it was theirs. Then lawsuits happen.

Then they'll make a movie out of the lawsuit.

What? O.o How in the flying f*** would it be possible for someone to sue over a theoretical ending from an IP that they DO NOT OWN. That's like saying someone can sue because a writer copied their fan fiction.

[DamonD7]

I think it's tremendous.

I don't buy it for a second, personally.

But how fans can take what I consider to be oversights, errors and artistic license and create something relatively watertight is pretty amazing, in a good way.

I think Bioware are right not to confirm or deny it officially, as it's right to let fans put their own ideas and interpretations on things, particularly the more intelligent and interesting ones like this.

So I disgaree with it, but it's still pretty cool.

Modifié par DamonD7, 11 avril 2012 - 02:20 .