AndanteInBlue wrote...
I disagree. I think having Earth maps showing iconic locations in a wartorn light could be very interesting. The challenge is somehow incorporating present day landmarks with distinctive wartorn, futuristic atmosphere.
MuhidinSaid wrote...
This one would like to see alien planets being occupied by giant evil space robots. If they stop at one map, fine, but this one has a nagging feeling that they wont.
It will still play it, but this one has a right to voice its concerns.
maxtofunator wrote...
There is still fighting on Earth prior to the end of the game, thus it makes sense to add it. Add a map like the part on the roofs look wise. So it's not just the look of a city, and the n7 team would still be showing up on Earth, probably a lot.
Slappy Mancuso wrote...
Hmmmm...
Take Surkesh back?
Narp.
Take Horizon back?
Am I the only one who hates that place?
Eden Prime(where it all began)
I'm pretty sure Javik is handling this himself.
Take Earth back!
Yes please.
Modifié par Shock n Awe, 11 avril 2012 - 04:56 .
Modifié par Dest1ny, 11 avril 2012 - 04:59 .
AlphaFist wrote...
I wouldn't want to see any Earth maps either, wouldn't make much sense to see Cerberus or the Geth fighting there.
DarkKindness wrote...
maxtofunator wrote...
There is still fighting on Earth prior to the end of the game, thus it makes sense to add it. Add a map like the part on the roofs look wise. So it's not just the look of a city, and the n7 team would still be showing up on Earth, probably a lot.
Some spoilers ahead.
I agree with this. I'd be willing to bet that an Earth map is in our future, probably something from the run up to the teleportation beam (the missile defense segment, maybe?), if only because the art assets are already in the game. By that reasoning, there are a lot of planets that we could see more of as multiplayer maps, since a lot of the planets that are core to the plot have art assets in ME3 already.
I have no complaints with the thought of a London map - how many BF3 maps have a giant Reaper teleporter in the background, a space battle going on overhead, and so on? Just because it's war-torn Earth doesn't mean that it has to be samey-samey war-torn Earth.
Modifié par MuhidinSaid, 11 avril 2012 - 04:59 .
Shock n Awe wrote...
All of the current maps look as tough they could take place on some point on Earth anyway, for the most part. Point moderately invalid (planets like Surkesh and Thessia could be interesting, many others could just be another backdrop on Earth).
Shock n Awe wrote...
All of the current maps look as tough they could take place on some point on Earth anyway, for the most part. Point moderately invalid (planets like Surkesh and Thessia could be interesting, many others could just be another backdrop on Earth).
Modifié par SinerAthin, 11 avril 2012 - 05:03 .
MuhidinSaid wrote...
DarkKindness wrote...
maxtofunator wrote...
There is still fighting on Earth prior to the end of the game, thus it makes sense to add it. Add a map like the part on the roofs look wise. So it's not just the look of a city, and the n7 team would still be showing up on Earth, probably a lot.
Some spoilers ahead.
I agree with this. I'd be willing to bet that an Earth map is in our future, probably something from the run up to the teleportation beam (the missile defense segment, maybe?), if only because the art assets are already in the game. By that reasoning, there are a lot of planets that we could see more of as multiplayer maps, since a lot of the planets that are core to the plot have art assets in ME3 already.
I have no complaints with the thought of a London map - how many BF3 maps have a giant Reaper teleporter in the background, a space battle going on overhead, and so on? Just because it's war-torn Earth doesn't mean that it has to be samey-samey war-torn Earth.
You misinterpret this ones doubts, young geth, the idea for maps on Earth are all basically the same, take away the look of the enemies and the time period and the motive for attacking said part of Earth, and you have the exact same thing in every friggin multiplayer map. Corpses, burned out vehicles, smoke and ash, bullet ridden walls,etc,etc.
Why not have giant reapers in orbit locked in a deadlock with turian cruisers or volus frigates over some dismal planet, why earth, it is far too generic for the once-talented minds of bioware to waste themselves on.
Modifié par DarkKindness, 11 avril 2012 - 05:04 .
Dest1ny wrote...
Actually, I disagree. One part we don't really see in ME3 SP is the actual massive battle that is supposed to be taking part on earth while Shepard is doing his thing. So it's not illogical to have earth maps where squads have been inserted to do this or that, with MP illustrating that. Sure you'd be fighting Geth/Cerb but then you can just get past that, really, and remember it's SUPPOSED to be Reapers. Just like how there isn't supposed to be Geth in a Cerb facility, yet there is. Same goes for other maps.
Nothing wrong with 1-2 earth maps.
SinerAthin wrote...
War-torn London looks amazing so shut up
I'd love to fight near a firing Hades cannon!
(though makes sure it disorients the mobs too so it doesn't give them an advantage)
DarkKindness wrote...
MuhidinSaid wrote...
DarkKindness wrote...
maxtofunator wrote...
There is still fighting on Earth prior to the end of the game, thus it makes sense to add it. Add a map like the part on the roofs look wise. So it's not just the look of a city, and the n7 team would still be showing up on Earth, probably a lot.
Some spoilers ahead.
I agree with this. I'd be willing to bet that an Earth map is in our future, probably something from the run up to the teleportation beam (the missile defense segment, maybe?), if only because the art assets are already in the game. By that reasoning, there are a lot of planets that we could see more of as multiplayer maps, since a lot of the planets that are core to the plot have art assets in ME3 already.
I have no complaints with the thought of a London map - how many BF3 maps have a giant Reaper teleporter in the background, a space battle going on overhead, and so on? Just because it's war-torn Earth doesn't mean that it has to be samey-samey war-torn Earth.
You misinterpret this ones doubts, young geth, the idea for maps on Earth are all basically the same, take away the look of the enemies and the time period and the motive for attacking said part of Earth, and you have the exact same thing in every friggin multiplayer map. Corpses, burned out vehicles, smoke and ash, bullet ridden walls,etc,etc.
Why not have giant reapers in orbit locked in a deadlock with turian cruisers or volus frigates over some dismal planet, why earth, it is far too generic for the once-talented minds of bioware to waste themselves on.
By that logic, almost any multiplayer map is basically the same - contrived cover of appropriate heights for the game's cover mechanic (if any), bullet ridden walls, burned out vehicles (usually functional as cover!), etc...
There's no reason that an Earth map couldn't have a reaper walking/terrorizing in the background, the Reaper teleporter, the space battle above the planet, etc... to make it unique and distinct.
Also, I'm not proposing that they focus solely on Earth maps from here on out - but I'd like to see one. There's no reason not to include the seat of the Alliance if we're including Tuchanka (already in), Palaven (already in via one of its moons), and so on and so forth. I think that each of the council races' homeworlds deserves at least one MP map, humanity included.
BearcatPrideEZF wrote...
Lawls. OP, no one likes your opinion.
Kailjaiden wrote...
I'm glad the OP does not work for Bioware. "No earth maps because, well, I DONT WAN IT."
haha ha yea right. sorry for being mean.
Modifié par MuhidinSaid, 11 avril 2012 - 05:12 .
Gordonjoeman wrote...
Earth map(s) would actually be great, as the whole game LEADS UP TO fighting on Earth. Would rofl though fighting Cerberus in London...
Retour en haut