Modifié par ognick23, 11 avril 2012 - 08:39 .
Better Business Bureau finds ME3 falsely advertised by Bioware and EA
#101
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:37
#102
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:37
#103
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:37
Aesieru wrote...
xsdob wrote...
Well, if this actually goes anywhere, than enjoy mass effect 3's 95% great content while you can because the entire game will be removed from circulation.
So yeah, mass effect will just be known as the sequel bait finale for this series, enjoy.
95%?
You spend 25+ hours building up assets that end up being replaced by a generic force that dies miserably and doesn't even behave canonically.
I enjoyed everything leading up to the final choices, not my probelm that you didn't.
#104
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:37
I disagree with that. Has any game been removed from circulation because of bad press? Certainly, they have had cases where they quit producing copies of a game and quit supporting a bad game but I can't think of one where they had a recall where it was removed from circulation because of bad PR.xsdob wrote...
Well, if this actually goes anywhere, than enjoy mass effect 3's 95% great content while you can because the entire game will be removed from circulation.
So yeah, mass effect will just be known as the sequel bait finale for this series, enjoy.
They aren't going to take this game away because that would require them to refund us for taking it away and there is no way they are giving our money back now. They could let it die like DA2 did, but that is different from removing it from circulation.
#105
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:38
Aesieru wrote...
Wait... what?!
http://www.bbb.org/b...etter-or-worse/ http://www.bbb.org/b...etter-or-worse/
http://www.bbb.org/b...etter-or-worse/
http://www.bbb.org/b...etter-or-worse/
http://www.bbb.org/b...etter-or-worse/
...........................
.
reported for spam
Modifié par Dridengx, 11 avril 2012 - 08:38 .
#106
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:38
Father_Jerusalem wrote...
Well this will surely affect BioWare's rating with the BBB so that people will...
Wait, what's that? BioWare doesn't pay the BBB to rate them? Like a lot of companies don't? So this whole thing really makes no difference and means nothing at all?
Well how bout that.
Not true.
BBB ratings are one of the things that are taken into account when investigating a company, whether or not they paid for it or not, and if they did pay for it, they look into seeing if they were trying to buy off the BBB. In that regard, if the FTC were to open an investigation or someone were to sue BioWare, the BBB rating would be taken into account to see their value.
The BBB is an American institution and BioWare is not headquarted as one. That being said EA is a BBB company, with an A rating and has over 1000 complaints but is not actually accredited and so their ranking isn't solid.
#107
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:38
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
#108
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:39
Modifié par John Epler, 11 avril 2012 - 08:48 .
#109
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:39
Tirigon wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
Ignoring content and then arguing that the content is false by ignoring it, is trolling.
#110
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:41
Aesieru wrote...
, I am reporting you for trolling.
I will report you for harassment then
#111
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:41
Guest_slyguy200_*
He is a troll because he is a troll, not because he disagrees with anyone.Tirigon wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
#112
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:41
XTR3M3 wrote...
I disagree with that. Has any game been removed from circulation because of bad press? Certainly, they have had cases where they quit producing copies of a game and quit supporting a bad game but I can't think of one where they had a recall where it was removed from circulation because of bad PR.xsdob wrote...
Well, if this actually goes anywhere, than enjoy mass effect 3's 95% great content while you can because the entire game will be removed from circulation.
So yeah, mass effect will just be known as the sequel bait finale for this series, enjoy.
They aren't going to take this game away because that would require them to refund us for taking it away and there is no way they are giving our money back now. They could let it die like DA2 did, but that is different from removing it from circulation.
You can remove a game from circulation if it is illegal.
This is done with games with subjective content in other countries all the time. That being said, America is very light on censoring games unless it is beyond all doubt the spawn of evil. Such as Postal.
#113
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:41
Aesieru wrote...
That is not the definition of spam in any capacity.
That is throwing something at someone's face because they ignore it. Spam would be useless drivel for no sensical purpose.
As such, because of your blatant misinterpretation and ignorance towards it, I am reporting you for trolling.
Actually it is spam.
it may be spam for a valid cause but it's spam nonetheless.
And "I am reporting you..." never makes an argument good.
#114
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:42
Aesieru wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
Ignoring content and then arguing that the content is false by ignoring it, is trolling.
I think you don't know what that word means, and you need to stop talking before you swallow your foot.
#115
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:42
Guest_slyguy200_*
Both of you should stop.Dridengx wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
, I am reporting you for trolling.
I will report you for harassment then
#116
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:42
Modifié par John Epler, 11 avril 2012 - 08:48 .
#117
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:42
Dridengx wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
, I am reporting you for trolling.
I will report you for harassment then
Unless you can actually define harassment and how that is actually harassment... (since trolling is against the code of conduct and you are trolling, I am alerting you that I am reporting you for doing that which you hypocritically stated and thus violated the code of conduct by doing) you have no ground to stand on.
#118
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:43
Modifié par John Epler, 11 avril 2012 - 08:48 .
#119
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:43
#120
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:43
Guest_slyguy200_*
Well, as far as anyone needs to be concerned, that is grounds to call someone a troll. Also shush hench, cuz you been trollin too.HenchxNarf wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
Ignoring content and then arguing that the content is false by ignoring it, is trolling.
I think you don't know what that word means, and you need to stop talking before you swallow your foot.
#121
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:44
#122
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:44
HenchxNarf wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
AJ is a troll... this thread proves it.
Considering I didnt bother to read the article you are discussing, I can not judge that,
But keep in mind that having a different - even a wrong - opinion does not make someone a troll.
Ignoring content and then arguing that the content is false by ignoring it, is trolling.
I think you don't know what that word means, and you need to stop talking before you swallow your foot.
You have always been a person that trolls inadvertently most of the time, your issues with things or thoughts be they true or not (and in this case they aren't like usual), doesn't really matter to me.
#123
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:45
that reminds me of someone trying to ignore you by looking EVERYWHERE else but at you even though you are right up in their grill....soo funny. nice point and counterpoint with the "reported for trolling".Dridengx wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
Wait... what?!
(lol took out the "in yo face" links)reported for spam
That is not the definition of spam in any capacity.
That is throwing something at someone's face because they ignore it. Spam would be useless drivel for no sensical purpose.
As such, because of your blatant misinterpretation and ignorance towards it, I am reporting you for trolling.
Modifié par XTR3M3, 11 avril 2012 - 08:46 .
#124
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:45
slyguy200 wrote...
Well, as far as anyone needs to be concerned, that is grounds to call someone a troll. Also shush hench, cuz you been trollin too.
When? I actually haven't trolled at all. In fact, I haven't even been on these boards in about two days.
And, no, its not grounds to call soemone a troll.
#125
Posté 11 avril 2012 - 08:45
Aesieru wrote...
Correct, that isn't the definition of spam... spam is useless drivel or lack of content with no related purpose.
This is how they defined spam mail that comes in your email and USED to come in your actual mail.
Perhaps a class in English would behoove you.
... Yeah, moving on. You have no idea what the hell you're talking about.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





