101 réponses à ce sujet

[MentalKase]

If all synthic isn't destroyed then why did the catalyst say that all synthic (any AI, VI, and cybernics, not just those with reaper tech) life would be destroyed.

Modifié par MentalKase, 12 avril 2012 - 12:25 .

[Hepatitis P]

fr33stylez wrote...

So quoting ME3:

*Destroy Option*

Starchild: You can wipe out all synthetic life if you want. Even you are part synthetic.
Shepard: But the Reapers will be destroyed?
Starchild: Yes, but the peace won't last.

So what does this mean? The ending was a lie? I had to re-watch the ending and withhold my laughter while watching that mess.

War, war never Changes

[Bill Casey]

If true, I'm assuming that's only if Shepard has high enough EMS to live...
So the Geth lose their individuality, and EDI loses some of her intelligence...

It would be using the Reapers and their gifts (Mass Relays, Geth evolution) or destroying them to achieve them on your own terms...

Or... green...

[Balmung31]

Hepatitis P wrote...

fr33stylez wrote...

So quoting ME3:

*Destroy Option*

Starchild: You can wipe out all synthetic life if you want. Even you are part synthetic.
Shepard: But the Reapers will be destroyed?
Starchild: Yes, but the peace won't last.

So what does this mean? The ending was a lie? I had to re-watch the ending and withhold my laughter while watching that mess.

War, war never Changes

(Old Snake from MGS4)

"...War has changed..."

[Aramiss Ducati]

cardinalally wrote...

So the geth lose their true intelligence and legions sacrifice meant nothing!! Great (sarcasm)

Maybe legions sacrifice will allow them to retain there indviduality regardles of the reaper code..... or maybe I'am just grasping at straws.

Modifié par Aramiss Ducati, 12 avril 2012 - 12:29 .

[Bill Casey]

I am KROGAN wrote...

 If, and it's a big IF, this is true.  Why would anyone choose anything other than destroy.  Geth live, reapers dead, relays destroyed (same as other endings) and Shepherd breath sequence.

Really no negatives I can see.

"According to Twitter", Control only damages the Relays, so they can be easily rebuilt. And apparently EDI and Geth can use the Reaper's gifts. And you can become the new Catalyst and maybe use the Reapers for things. Alledgedly, it takes longer and requires more hardships to rebuild galactic society in the Destroy ending...


And Synthesis...

itisgreen.ytmnd.com/

Modifié par Bill Casey, 12 avril 2012 - 12:47 .

[Sal86]

If it's not @MassEffect then it's a personal twitter account. In other words, that's her personal take on it, it's not cannon.

[Dranks]

I hope this is true. I don't want the Geth to die and we can finally take the whole genocide debate out behind the shed and shoot it. I mean she has said numerous times she is only speaking as a fan and NOT as an employee, but I hope it's what happens. 

Modifié par Dranks, 12 avril 2012 - 12:31 .

[Rick Lewis]

I like how other employees of Bioware are answering questions that the lead writer is better qualified to answer. Take her answers with a grain of salt folks. Just my opinion.

[DJBare]

MentalKase wrote...

If all synthic isn't destroyed then why did the catalyst say that all synthic (any AI, VI, and cybernics, not just those with reaper tech) life would be destroyed.

Does anyone around here actually get the concept of a "lie"?, because amongst all the posts it's hard to see.

[Clayless]

hippanda wrote...

Basically all this says to me is, "don't use Jessica Merizan's twitter as a source of information."

This.

[MegaSovereign]

Vigil_N7 wrote...

Proof?

If its true... then bioware can shove their "artistic" integrity up their arse, because it doesn't exist.

I know people wanted a happy ending, but why pick anything else other than destroy if that is the case? I know people want to feel validated in destroy because shepard lives, but it removes CHOICE at the end of the game when the choice is the only true choice that matters in the entire series.

At least right now we have 3 different choices all with their pros and cons, they do this and there is absolutely no reason to pick anything else other than destroy, which is a joke.

I agree 100%. The point of synthetic life dying is to make the decision not seem as obvious to the player.

[Hepatitis P]

Geth now have/had Personalitys

I dont think they die or loose anything since Legion used the knowledge of the Reapers to Upgrade them

[Bill Casey]

DJBare wrote...

Does anyone around here actually get the concept of a "lie"?, because amongst all the posts it's hard to see.

I never believed the Starkid...
But that's the problem, because he's the only thing giving me exposition and context...

That leaves me in a room with three random paths...

[MatronAdena]

EDI surviving is known fact, and further covered by Patrick- and in my book the Geth are no more, or less reaper tech " enhanced" than her so I've always taken it that the kid was full of BS trying to save his own skin, or the left hand had no idea what the right did while writing.

[rachellouise]

wait, he didn't say reaper tech, did he? He said synthetic life. Or am I remembering incorrectly?

[Bill Casey]

He also said whatever you pick, the Mass Relays would be destroyed, and that doesn't happen in Control, apparently...

[DJBare]

rachellouise wrote...

wait, he didn't say reaper tech, did he? He said synthetic life. Or am I remembering incorrectly?

He said "ALL synthetic"; the points is whether you believe him or not, is he lying to save his arse?

[incinerator950]

DJBare wrote...

MentalKase wrote...

If all synthic isn't destroyed then why did the catalyst say that all synthic (any AI, VI, and cybernics, not just those with reaper tech) life would be destroyed.

Does anyone around here actually get the concept of a "lie"?, because amongst all the posts it's hard to see.

Even if it is right or wrong, you can't see your decision.  At this point its a limbo outcome.  At least Control or Synthesis you can see your actions and a greater impact.

[Xenite]

Yes they do die, see I can speculate too.

[N7Infernox]

MegaSovereign wrote...

Vigil_N7 wrote...

Proof?

If its true... then bioware can shove their "artistic" integrity up their arse, because it doesn't exist.

I know people wanted a happy ending, but why pick anything else other than destroy if that is the case? I know people want to feel validated in destroy because shepard lives, but it removes CHOICE at the end of the game when the choice is the only true choice that matters in the entire series.

At least right now we have 3 different choices all with their pros and cons, they do this and there is absolutely no reason to pick anything else other than destroy, which is a joke.

I agree 100%. The point of synthetic life dying is to make the decision not seem as obvious to the player.

I would have been fine with having destroy as the only option. So long as I earn the chance to see my war assets play out, I'm good.
I mean, didn't everyone's Shep plan on destroying the Reapers? The only other option seemed to be succumbing to them (b4 the catalyst showed up, that is).

[Palathas]

Somebody set us up the Crucible.

All your speculations are belong to us!

Modifié par Palathas, 12 avril 2012 - 12:47 .

[blooregard]

balance5050 wrote...

So twitter is canon now huh? Jessica Merizan is the newest Bioware writer?

Didn't they kill off  multiple characters on twitter?


In any case why can't people realize that Jess can't/won't tell us anything of importance.