Aller au contenu

Photo

BBB Recognizes False Advertisement Claims About ME3 As Valid


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
197 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Guest_Opsrbest_*

Guest_Opsrbest_*
  • Guests

Wynteryth wrote...

Opsrbest wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

xsdob wrote...

Oh great, now tell me how you plan for an American governmental institution to fine a Canadian branch of a company for claims it made. Also, who you plan to send into the 5 to 8 year waiting period of getting the case to court, and to than convince the judge to not throw the case out, all while raking up large amounts of legal fees, and hoping to god EA doesn't drag the process out an additional 20 years.

EDIT: so it's just the same BBB story as the other, well isn't that just great, all you have to do is replace the term "govermental institution" with "grop who actually have no power at all in this matter" and it all still makes sense.


No ****e, people don't understand the court system and big corps.

Edit: curses, I'd hoped to get that past. Oh well. Point still stands.

An American court can't impose anything on a Canadian Branch. They can impose it on the American version of the branch but all EA would have to do is shut down that branch and they are free to continue to ignore it. Jurisdiction is very important on things like this.

For example NCSoft and Tera.


First off, EA is an American Company.  So, just because it was a "Canadian Branch" doesn't mean diddly when it comes to court.  It will affect the parent company.  Secondly, the Court can and has imposed sanctions on companies who have tried to get out of paying fines stipulated by the courts.  Thirdly, ANY smart lawyer would include the parent company as part of the lawsuit to ensure that money is paid.  Fourth, a smart lawyer sees the name EA and knows that they are just another big Computer Company waiting to get smacked.  One only has to look at Microsoft and Apple to know that it's coming.  And, on this sort of thing, it IS something that the government could very easily get involved in. Particularly since it would fall under international trade and it would be them taking EA to court.  

Don't write off the BBB weighing in negatively on Bioware and EA.  While they aren't a "government agency", they are looked on very favorably by the FTC and have used BBB rulings as evidence previously.  

Where did I say EA was Canadian? Bioware is which I did say.

Granted I took short the context of the liability of EA under a parent suit or groups suit. I wasn't aware that level of discussion was occuring in this thread.

And i'm not writing off the BBB because of it's negative technicality on Bioware. I'm writing it off because its the BBB.

I actually support the idea of a lawsuit against Bioware/EA. I would love to see the effect that has on gamers and the games they claim to love.

Modifié par Opsrbest, 12 avril 2012 - 05:25 .


#52
thunderhawk862002

thunderhawk862002
  • Members
  • 719 messages
Actually, I lodged my BBB complaint at EA and not BioWare. EA responded in about a week. . I was actually surprised EA responded since it isn't a BBB member. Still haven't gotten the answers I was seeking yet. Probably wait another week before contacting the EA rep again.

#53
Scott2998

Scott2998
  • Members
  • 110 messages
"technically yes" on a blog is not a ruling.

Posting several articles who quote the same "technically yes" blog post are not rulings either.

They're just a bunch of writers using the headline to generate page hits because they know people who are raging at EA/Bioware will flock to them. So you fell for another PR scheme. When will you ever learn?

#54
addiction21

addiction21
  • Members
  • 6 066 messages

AJRimmsey wrote...

addiction21 wrote...

It was the opnion of a person that works at many of the BBB places. On the blog section.

Come back when they make an actual ruling then there might be something to it.


why bother to wait ?


Because the BBB actualy ruling that it was false advertising would mean something. It would be something real.

EA to me has been rather offensive to me as a adult gamer with some of their marketing. Deadspace "your mother would hate this" or whatever that bs was. Dantes infero and having fake religious people picketing.  Just watch http://www.penny-arc...to-ea-marketing

I also understand that a lot of these "lies" are not lies. Just what is called marketing. Making more of something then what it actually is. There are diffrences to the endings. Its not just A, B, C but how it ended up in the actual game was ****. ****ing terrible ****.

#55
Banelash

Banelash
  • Members
  • 382 messages
False advertising is frown upon, like when coke and cigarettes were advertised as health products.

#56
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests
*sigh*

"The decisions you make completely shape your experience and outcome," Uh yeah, the game did that in many places. Genophage & Rannoch storylines for example.

Have you people ever taken a look at the back of a videogame cover?! Tons of CGI images and broken promises. A lot of the time, the text makes the game sound good, even if it isn't. FALSE ADVERTISING!!! Videogame companies LIE all the time! And so do every other company. The people who actually reported ME3 for false advertising should be ashamed of themselves. You got your damn ending DLC, so why don't you just shut up already? You're pathetic.

#57
Kuari999

Kuari999
  • Members
  • 474 messages

The PLC wrote...

*sigh*

"The decisions you make completely shape your experience and outcome," Uh yeah, the game did that in many places. Genophage & Rannoch storylines for example.

Have you people ever taken a look at the back of a videogame cover?! Tons of CGI images and broken promises. A lot of the time, the text makes the game sound good, even if it isn't. FALSE ADVERTISING!!! Videogame companies LIE all the time! And so do every other company. The people who actually reported ME3 for false advertising should be ashamed of themselves. You got your damn ending DLC, so why don't you just shut up already? You're pathetic.


OK, you know what, I'll bit.. give me a few examples of very specific promises that CAN'T be attributed to simple opinion and amount to things like "this game is awesome!"  Seriously, go ahead, try it, because to be frank, I have not seen such undeniable and blatant lies from any other game company.  You want to resort to insults because you can't handle people legitimately complaining, put your money where your mouth is.  It flat out amazes me how a majority of those I see against those complaining can't figure out how to discuss without resorting to insults.  Frankly, that says a lot about how flimsy the argument against is.

Banelash wrote...

False advertising is frown upon, like when coke and cigarettes were advertised as health products.


Stuff like that is why there is a metric **** ton of advertising laws now, many of which are not really all that enforced.

AJRimmsey wrote...

EVEN when the BBB site clearly states they have nothing on bioware.


That section is usually for ongoing lawsuits, but yeah, I wouldn't call an F rating exactly nothing...  its pretty damn hard to get an F rating with the BBB.

Modifié par Kuari999, 12 avril 2012 - 06:36 .


#58
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests

Kuari999 wrote...

The PLC wrote...

*sigh*

"The decisions you make completely shape your experience and outcome," Uh yeah, the game did that in many places. Genophage & Rannoch storylines for example.

Have you people ever taken a look at the back of a videogame cover?! Tons of CGI images and broken promises. A lot of the time, the text makes the game sound good, even if it isn't. FALSE ADVERTISING!!! Videogame companies LIE all the time! And so do every other company. The people who actually reported ME3 for false advertising should be ashamed of themselves. You got your damn ending DLC, so why don't you just shut up already? You're pathetic.


OK, you know what, I'll bit.. give me a few examples of very specific promises that CAN'T be attributed to simple opinion and amount to things like "this game is awesome!"  Seriously, go ahead, try it, because to be frank, I have not seen such undeniable and blatant lies from any other game company.  You want to resort to insults because you can't handle people legitimately complaining, put your money where your mouth is.  It flat out amazes me how a majority of those I see against those complaining can't figure out how to discuss without resorting to insults.  Frankly, that says a lot about how flimsy the argument against is.

Banelash wrote...

False advertising is frown upon, like when coke and cigarettes were advertised as health products.


Stuff like that is why there is a metric **** ton of advertising laws now, many of which are not really all that enforced.

"..to be frank, I have not seen such undeniable and blatant lies from any other game company."
Pretty much every developer says that their game will be good in interviews before launch. Unfortunately, lots of the turns out to be absolute garbage. That, is a lie. 

"You want to resort to insults because you can't handle people legitimately complaining, put your money where your mouth is."
You want me to 'put my money where my mouth is'? you're the one who's unsatisfied. Just sell the game, and don't buy any dlc then? Bioware won't be getting a cent from you that way. Is it really that **** hard?!

#59
Kuari999

Kuari999
  • Members
  • 474 messages

The PLC wrote...

"..to be frank, I have not seen such undeniable and blatant lies from any other game company."
Pretty much every developer says that their game will be good in interviews before launch. Unfortunately, lots of the turns out to be absolute garbage. That, is a lie. 

"You want to resort to insults because you can't handle people legitimately complaining, put your money where your mouth is."
You want me to 'put my money where my mouth is'? you're the one who's unsatisfied. Just sell the game, and don't buy any dlc then? Bioware won't be getting a cent from you that way. Is it really that **** hard?!


Uhh, no...  dude, seriously, you need to figure out the difference between facts and opinions.  Opinions you can pretty much say anything and its very hard to call it a lie.  "This game is good!" isn't a lie, generally, no matter how much you dislike it.  "You won't get an A, B, or C type ending" and then ending on an A, B or C note?  That can be factually proven.  That isn't a matter of opinion.

Anyways, fact of the matter is, I CAN'T sell the game, its attached to Origin and they refuse to refund my money, so I'm sort of stuck with it, but yes, if you want to insult people and you can't really back up your opinion with anything but insults?  That's pretty much just looking for a fight right there.  Do you insult people you know when you disagree with them?

#60
Zhuinden

Zhuinden
  • Members
  • 2 480 messages
The outcome of the game is barely defined by your actions, honestly.
They lied, they're hiding, they don't admit their mistake, they deserve whatever treatment they get. I'm curious to see how this will play out.

#61
Eterna

Eterna
  • Members
  • 7 417 messages
Ah yes, "sanity", we have dismissed these claims.

#62
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests

Kuari999 wrote...

The PLC wrote...

"..to be frank, I have not seen such undeniable and blatant lies from any other game company."
Pretty much every developer says that their game will be good in interviews before launch. Unfortunately, lots of the turns out to be absolute garbage. That, is a lie. 

"You want to resort to insults because you can't handle people legitimately complaining, put your money where your mouth is."
You want me to 'put my money where my mouth is'? you're the one who's unsatisfied. Just sell the game, and don't buy any dlc then? Bioware won't be getting a cent from you that way. Is it really that **** hard?!


Uhh, no...  dude, seriously, you need to figure out the difference between facts and opinions.  Opinions you can pretty much say anything and its very hard to call it a lie.  "This game is good!" isn't a lie, generally, no matter how much you dislike it.  "You won't get an A, B, or C type ending" and then ending on an A, B or C note?  That can be factually proven.  That isn't a matter of opinion.

Anyways, fact of the matter is, I CAN'T sell the game, its attached to Origin and they refuse to refund my money, so I'm sort of stuck with it, but yes, if you want to insult people and you can't really back up your opinion with anything but insults?  That's pretty much just looking for a fight right there.  Do you insult people you know when you disagree with them?

Believe it or not, but there really are games out there that are BAD. Like Big Rigs. Hell, I'll just go to my shelf and grab a random game.
GTA IV has a picture of the main character wearing fingerless gloves... those were not in the game. 
Fable 3: "A new game, every time." Well that's a lie right there, because no matter what you do, there's a lot of situations that will play out the same way, no matter what you do. Lies! I want my money back!

"Do you insult people you know when you disagree with them?" No, because people I know don't complain about trivial **** like this for weeks.

#63
xenu101

xenu101
  • Members
  • 74 messages
Circle the wagons fanboys, it still won't do you any good.

The rEApers have sucked the life out of Bioware, it's a dead husk and you tools can't admit it. Another bomb like ME3 and DA2 and it's bye, bye.

#64
Kuari999

Kuari999
  • Members
  • 474 messages

The PLC wrote...
Believe it or not, but there really are games out there that are BAD. Like Big Rigs. Hell, I'll just go to my shelf and grab a random game.
GTA IV has a picture of the main character wearing fingerless gloves... those were not in the game. 
Fable 3: "A new game, every time." Well that's a lie right there, because no matter what you do, there's a lot of situations that will play out the same way, no matter what you do. Lies! I want my money back!

"Do you insult people you know when you disagree with them?" No, because people I know don't complain about trivial **** like this for weeks.


Except some people LIKE those games.  You can't confuse opinion with fact.  Not even something like Big Rigs.
GTA IV...  really?  You're trying to compare cover art to blatant statements?  Cover art is always assumed to not indicate what the game itself is.

EDIT : (On a side note, those gloves ARE in the game, so that isn't even right)

Fable 3 it isn't specific what it means by that.  It isn't a specific statement.
Also what's trivial to you isn't always trivial to others, nor vice versa.  Just like how I find it a bit silly that some people will shout at the TV during a football game, others wouldn't have it any other way.  I guarantee there is something you like that others will find trivial.  This is a fact of life.  If you bash someone because you think its trivial, then you really are just asking for any negative reaction you get.

Seriously, you don't even know the definition of false advertising, you've more then proven that with this.  False advertising has to be very specific most of the time, and BioWare was pretty damned specific with A LOT.

Modifié par Kuari999, 12 avril 2012 - 07:09 .


#65
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests

Kuari999 wrote...

The PLC wrote...
Believe it or not, but there really are games out there that are BAD. Like Big Rigs. Hell, I'll just go to my shelf and grab a random game.
GTA IV has a picture of the main character wearing fingerless gloves... those were not in the game. 
Fable 3: "A new game, every time." Well that's a lie right there, because no matter what you do, there's a lot of situations that will play out the same way, no matter what you do. Lies! I want my money back!

"Do you insult people you know when you disagree with them?" No, because people I know don't complain about trivial **** like this for weeks.


Except some people LIKE those games.  You can't confuse opinion with fact.  Not even something like Big Rigs.
GTA IV...  really?  You're trying to compare cover art to blatant statements?  Cover art is always assumed to not indicate what the game itself is.
Fable 3 it isn't specific what it means by that.  It isn't a specific statement.
Also what's trivial to you isn't always trivial to others, nor vice versa.  Just like how I find it a bit silly that some people will shout at the TV during a football game, others wouldn't have it any other way.  I guarantee there is something you like that others will find trivial.  This is a fact of life.  If you bash someone because you think its trivial, then you really are just asking for any negative reaction you get.

Seriously, you don't even know the definition of false advertising, you've more then proven that with this.  False advertising has to be very specific most of the time, and BioWare was pretty damned specific with A LOT.

"Except some people LIKE those games.  You can't confuse opinion with fact.  Not even something like Big Rigs."
People LIKE a lot of stuff. Like it or not, but there is such a thing as a bad game and a bad movie. Just because a few nut jobs enjoy The Room, doesn't mean that the movie is any good. Granted, crappy movies can be fun, but it's still absolute ****.

"Cover art is always assumed to not indicate what the game itself is."
Doesnt' make it alright. They're still lying. 

"Fable 3 it isn't specific what it means by that.  It isn't a specific statement."
Yes it is. They say the game will be different each time, but it clearly isn't. I still have to do a lot of the same stuff as I did the last time. 

#66
fruton

fruton
  • Members
  • 146 messages
The whole "game is awesome" / not argument is not a lie, that is subjective to the person playing it.

Saying you will be able to import your character through the whole series and then releasing the third installment which prevented that happening for ALOT of people (please see the 350 odd page thread at the top of these boards) is false advertising.

Matter of opinion = not false advertising

Matter or fact = false advertising

#67
Kuari999

Kuari999
  • Members
  • 474 messages

The PLC wrote...
"Except some people LIKE those games.  You can't confuse opinion with fact.  Not even something like Big Rigs."
People LIKE a lot of stuff. Like it or not, but there is such a thing as a bad game and a bad movie. Just because a few nut jobs enjoy The Room, doesn't mean that the movie is any good. Granted, crappy movies can be fun, but it's still absolute ****.

"Cover art is always assumed to not indicate what the game itself is."
Doesnt' make it alright. They're still lying. 

"Fable 3 it isn't specific what it means by that.  It isn't a specific statement."
Yes it is. They say the game will be different each time, but it clearly isn't. I still have to do a lot of the same stuff as I did the last time. 


If I say something is awesome and you say something sucks, who is to say is right?  Good or bad when it comes to entertainment isn't something that's an absolute.  Its why the argument isn't directed towards "getting a satisfying ending" tidbit that was thrown around so much as the specifics.  You CAN'T call that false advertising, pure and simple.  That ISN'T what false advertising is.  Nor is it technically lying.  For example, The Room you said?  Made by Tommy Wiseau?  He says its a great movie.  Well he's not lying because he really thinks its great.  Nutcased or not, that's how it is, pure and simple.

Artists are going to take artistic liberties, its going to happen.  Its not something you can compare this to, pure and simple.  It just doesn't work that way.  Some details are going to be a little off.

As for Fable 3, even if things are just slightly different, its still different, thus why specifics are necessary for it to be false advertising and not some overblown PR speak.  The devil's in the details as they say, or at least I think that's how it goes.

People know this, people understand this, and the law accepts this.  Can one disagree with it? Absolutely, but overall, this is what the majority considers acceptable.  BioWare however stepped onto grounds which a VERY large portion find unacceptable, and is legally questionable.  Now granted, no court would take the case seriously, buuut customers sure as hell will.  For reasons beyond the false advertising as well (such as a betrayal to the franchise on the scale of one of Conan Doyle's biggest blunders), but there it is.  You don't have to like it, but you need to stop comparing it to what its not.  At this point you can take it or leave it.

#68
Korubrus

Korubrus
  • Members
  • 99 messages

Jon Phoenix wrote...

Bioware didn't say they had to overt choices. The reality is that all of the choices YOU made did factor in to the choice YOU made at the end. Fulfilling Bioware's promises via prophecy.

For example, I expect there is an extremely strong correlation between playing paragon/renegade and the decision chosen at the end, that means that all the choices you made did make a difference to your ending.

The argument that it didn't is fallacious.


*"Along the way, your choices drive powerful outcomes, including relationships with key characters, the fate of entire civilizations, and even radically different ending scenarios."

Radically different ending scenarios. My interpretation of this is that the endings would be very different, almost unrecognisable from the last depending on your decisions and choices made.
The endings were slightly altered from one another, the most extreme alteration being the colour spewed from the relays.

I am upset with the ending because they use a word like "radical", use that word to get people's attention - and fail to deliver. Being a big coorporation they consider it ok to advertise carelessly to get more sales. 
If they had told me "Our endings will be almost identical regardless of what you choose!" I would have watched a "Lets Play" on YouTube - THEN bought the game for $10 in 6 months time from the discount bin!
In oppose to preordering, getting all the fancy add-ons and doo-dads spending $99.95!

#69
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests
The state you leave the galaxy in will be wildly different based on your choices. Especially the ending choice. They didn't lie.

Modifié par The PLC, 12 avril 2012 - 07:38 .


#70
Korubrus

Korubrus
  • Members
  • 99 messages

The PLC wrote...

The state you leave the galaxy in will be wildly different based on your choices. Especially the ending choice. They didn't lie.


I beg to differ. Based on the reaction - it would appear the mass of people disagree with that.

You choose the colour of explosion. Everything else is subjective - as in, the never actually show the result of anything else - how can I be sure anything else is changes/altered.

I do not care if big ben is destroyed, honestly its not a major concern to me, I can sleep knowing big ben was demolished by a red light - it is irrelevant to the mass effect saga.

To make that statement true you would have to SHOW us HOW things are different. At best they suggested that "Perhaps... Maybe... Possibly" things are different. Not good enough when the promise is that things "WILL" be different depending on choices - you cannot advertise closure and a black-and-white ending then deliver conjecture!

#71
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages

The PLC wrote...

The state you leave the galaxy in will be wildly different based on your choices. Especially the ending choice. They didn't lie.


The ending isn't what the retakers want so it doesn't matter to them.  Besides they will tear apart what you say and probably say that's "Subjective"

#72
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages
HA I WAS RIGHT...man i should of waited longer to post then

#73
Korubrus

Korubrus
  • Members
  • 99 messages

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

HA I WAS RIGHT...man i should of waited longer to post then


Yes you should have:)

#74
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages
Ya, next time I will just post quickly, rather then go and get some tea. that precious minute.........

#75
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests

Korubrus wrote...

The PLC wrote...

The state you leave the galaxy in will be wildly different based on your choices. Especially the ending choice. They didn't lie.


I beg to differ. Based on the reaction - it would appear the mass of people disagree with that.

You choose the colour of explosion. Everything else is subjective - as in, the never actually show the result of anything else - how can I be sure anything else is changes/altered.

I do not care if big ben is destroyed, honestly its not a major concern to me, I can sleep knowing big ben was demolished by a red light - it is irrelevant to the mass effect saga.

To make that statement true you would have to SHOW us HOW things are different. At best they suggested that "Perhaps... Maybe... Possibly" things are different. Not good enough when the promise is that things "WILL" be different depending on choices - you cannot advertise closure and a black-and-white ending then deliver conjecture!

"You choose the colour of explosion. Everything else is subjective - as in, the never actually show the result of anything else - how can I be sure anything else is changes/altered."
Well, they never show Shepard taking a dump or eating, so I guess we can't be sure he does those things either. Bioware don't have to SHOW everything. If you know just a little bit about the universe, you know what consequences some of the endings would have. I agree that they could have shown it, but it really wouldn't make a difference to me. 

"
Not good enough when the promise is that things "WILL" be different depending on choices "
But they will?