Aller au contenu

Photo

Mage-Templar Conflict morality


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
269 réponses à ce sujet

#26
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

esper wrote...
Real life armies in our real life history did what the Tevinter did in terms of slavery quite easily without magic.

Choice vs nature.

When tyrants rise up, you fight them. When the very nature of one's existence leads to such threats, you take precautions.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Circle mages are only able to achieve positions in a system where they are at the mercy of the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars.

And the alternative is non-mage people living at the mercy of the mages. The sides are incompatible. All you do is choose a side.

Modifié par the_one_54321, 12 avril 2012 - 04:50 .


#27
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

GodWood wrote...

Concentration camps where they're fed, sheltered, educated, able to work, make friends, practice their abilities and eventually aquire prestigious positions.


Circle mages are only able to achieve positions in a system where they are at the mercy of the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars. That isn't saying much.

Better than 95% of the population. 

The fact that they live in societies where the Chantry preaches that magic is a "curse" hardly makes life ideal for them, even in the Circle Towers.

Such propaganda is necessary so the plebs will rat out mages in the community/have them sent away.

It's a security thing. 

The fact that we read how Fiona thought the Circle was worse than her life as an Orlesian sex slave informs me that it's not quite the paradise you're making it out to be.

One person's unfortunate experience need not be reason to tear down the system or radically change it.

It just means there should be better over sight in some circles.

GodWood wrote...
Certainly a better living than the majority of the population of Thedas.

I'd imagine there are quite a few mages who would trade life under the Chantry controlled Circles in exchange for freedom,

Well they'd be stupid as they wouldn't end up having 'freedom'.

#28
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

esper wrote...
Real life armies in our real life history did what the Tevinter did in terms of slavery quite easily without magic.

Choice vs nature.

When tyrants rise up, you fight them. When the very nature of one's existence leads to such threats, you take precautions.


Tyrants raise with and withour magic. It is not in a mages nature to be a tyrant anymore than it is in any humans nature.
In fact under the White Divine it is arguelbly less in the mages nature than in ordinary, because the current generation of mages have been told about how 'evil' the Tevinter empire is, how magic is a curse and that slavery is wrong. 

#29
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages

esper wrote...

the_one_54321 wrote...

The Tevinter Empire subjugated all normal people under magic. Lets not forget that little piece of fictional history.



So? Your argument were to wherever mages possess a danger due to demons. Real life armies in our real life history did what the Tevinter did in terms of slavery quite easily without magic. All you need to make someone a slave is force. It is wrong either way, but is not something only a mage could do.

I don't recall any real world armies sundering the Veil between worlds and unleashing the Darkspawn on the world. But that might be due to my American public education.

#30
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Circle mages are only able to achieve positions in a system where they are at the mercy of the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars.


And the alternative is non-mage people living at the mercy of the mages. The sides are incompatible. All you do is choose a side. 


Mages are already living at the mercy of the templars. Cullen even addresses, "She is bound by faith and duty to support the Templars. We have dominance over mages by divine right."

I respectfully disagree with you about the only alternative being mages ruling over non-mages. Tevinter isn't the only society that has free mages, and we know those societies aren't trying to emulate Tevinter. When Aldenon the Great helped Teyrn Calenhad create Ferelden from warring teyrnirs, he was trying to establish a kingdom where all people would be treated equally. He condemned the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery. The Hero of Ferelden from the Circle of Ferelden can ask the new ruler to emancipate his people, and the ruler can agree that mages have earned the right to govern themselves; it doesn't become an issue of establishing a brutal magocracy like Tevinter, but simply giving mages their freedom from the Chantry of Andraste.

#31
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages
Should we kill or lock up people with a certain genetic make-up because of something they may or may not do?

X-Men, mutant registration, Super Hero Registration act ? For a fictional comparative.

Modifié par BobSmith101, 12 avril 2012 - 04:57 .


#32
esper

esper
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages

Maria Caliban wrote...

esper wrote...

the_one_54321 wrote...

The Tevinter Empire subjugated all normal people under magic. Lets not forget that little piece of fictional history.



So? Your argument were to wherever mages possess a danger due to demons. Real life armies in our real life history did what the Tevinter did in terms of slavery quite easily without magic. All you need to make someone a slave is force. It is wrong either way, but is not something only a mage could do.

I don't recall any real world armies sundering the Veil between worlds and unleashing the Darkspawn on the world. But that might be due to my American public education.


I recall the romans (english) subjegating most of europe. I recall the spanish and the portugise destroying the native culture in America. I recall asian, african, and middle east examples as well.

And you don't even know if your example is true, and even if it was. So what? None mage who live today was part of that.

#33
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
I respectfully disagree with you about the only alternative being mages ruling over non-mages.

Further cooperation is not at all impossible. But certainly, neither side appears at all interested in having a diplomatic sit-down to talk about their options for establishing a safe and fair system for the future. Nothing but sabre rattling going on in the current state of affairs.

BobSmith101 wrote...
Super Hero Registration act ?

I've made this exact parallel in thinking about this fictional issue, actually. It's a fantastic comparison. I especially love everything that Captain America has to say on the issue, all the way through the story line. And he finally comes to the conclusion that in resisting the protective measures, he is hurting the people that he always intended to protect, and he surrenders.

Modifié par the_one_54321, 12 avril 2012 - 05:02 .


#34
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

GodWood wrote...

Concentration camps where they're fed, sheltered, educated, able to work, make friends, practice their abilities and eventually aquire prestigious positions.


Circle mages are only able to achieve positions in a system where they are at the mercy of the Chantry of Andraste and the Order of Templars. That isn't saying much.


Better than 95% of the population.


Considering that mages are living in "dictatorships" (to quote Bioware's Michael Hamilton) where they are under the rule of a religious order that has "divine right" over their lives, I respectfully disagree.

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The fact that they live in societies where the Chantry preaches that magic is a "curse" hardly makes life ideal for them, even in the Circle Towers.


Such propaganda is necessary so the plebs will rat out mages in the community/have them sent away.

It's a security thing.


Which, as Wynne explained, leads to the Andrastian people killing mages when they blame mages for things that they weren't responsible for.

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The fact that we read how Fiona thought the Circle was worse than her life as an Orlesian sex slave informs me that it's not quite the paradise you're making it out to be.


One person's unfortunate experience need not be reason to tear down the system or radically change it.

It just means there should be better over sight in some circles.


Fiona isn't the only person who has an issue with the Chantry controlled Circles, as we see from Origins, Dragon Age II, and Asunder. Even the historical account of Aldenon the Great addressed that he (and his people) fought against the Chantry and the templars because he saw the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery.

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I'd imagine there are quite a few mages who would trade life under the Chantry controlled Circles in exchange for freedom,


Well they'd be stupid as they wouldn't end up having 'freedom'.


Jowan can have freedom from the Circle of Ferelden, and even live life as Master Levyn, protecting refugees from the darkspawn. Malcolm Hawke had freedom from the Chantry controlled Circles. Apostate Hawke can have freedom from the Circle of Kirkwall, as well as Anders and Merrill. I'm not certain why you think apostates can't achieve freedom from the Chantry and its templars.

#35
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...
The fact that we read how Fiona thought the Circle was worse than her life as an Orlesian sex slave informs me that it's not quite the paradise you're making it out to be.

One person's unfortunate experience need not be reason to tear down the system or radically change it.

It just means there should be better over sight in some circles.

Fiona isn't the only person who has an issue with the Chantry controlled Circles, as we see from Origins, Dragon Age II, and Asunder. Even the historical account of Aldenon the Great addressed that he (and his people) fought against the Chantry and the templars because he saw the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery.

"Just live with the fact that I might incinerate your town because I hated living under Chantry supervision more than I hated being a sex slave!"

Um, no thank you.

Modifié par the_one_54321, 12 avril 2012 - 05:14 .


#36
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I respectfully disagree with you about the only alternative being mages ruling over non-mages.


Further cooperation is not at all impossible. But certainly, neither side appears at all interested in having a diplomatic sit-down to talk about their options for establishing a safe and fair system for the future. Nothing but sabre rattling going on in the current state of affairs.


I don't see a compromise being realistic when both sides want the exact opposite from each other, but simply because there are mages who want freedom from the templars doesn't mean that they will try to emulate the Imperium.

the_one_54321 wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...

Super Hero Registration act ?


I've made this exact parallel in thinking about this fictional issue, actually. It's a fantastic comparison. I especially love everything that Captain America has to say on the issue, all the way through the story line. And he finally comes to the conclusion that in resisting the protective measures, he is hurting the people that he always intended to protect, and he surrenders.


The Superhero Registration Act had to do with superheroes registering with the government to prevent the accidental deaths of innocent people by untrained superheroes. I don't think anyone is seriously arguing that mages shouldn't be properly trained in the use of their abilities, but rather giving mages over to an organization that thinks they have divine right over them.

#37
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
I don't think anyone is seriously arguing that mages shouldn't be properly trained in the use of their abilities, but rather giving mages over to an organization that thinks they have divine right over them.

Mages can't have liberty and be safe for the rest of the populace.

Compromise on that, or outright conflict.

#38
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Fiona isn't the only person who has an issue with the Chantry controlled Circles, as we see from Origins, Dragon Age II, and Asunder. Even the historical account of Aldenon the Great addressed that he (and his people) fought against the Chantry and the templars because he saw the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery.


"Just live with the fact that I might incinerate your town because I hated living under Chantry supervision more than I hated being a sex slave!"

Um, no thank you.


The controversy over the Chantry controlled Circles is much more than simple "supervision," but I take it we aren't going to have a serious discussion on this matter at all.

#39
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
The controversy over the Chantry controlled Circles is much more than simple "supervision," but I take it we aren't going to have a serious discussion on this matter at all.

Supervision means that a possesed mage is put to death. Supervision means that a mage that uses blood magic is put to death. Supervision means that mages are watched so that these kinds of things can be tested and verified.

As I mentioned in the last post, compromise will mean that both sides give up something. Mages are required to give up their liberty, in some fashion, in order to be safe for the general populace.

You want the Chantry out of the picture? Understandable, but it's not out of the picture. The Chantry is the ruling body in this. So that creates one hell of a head-butting situation.

#40
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I don't think anyone is seriously arguing that mages shouldn't be properly trained in the use of their abilities, but rather giving mages over to an organization that thinks they have divine right over them.


Mages can't have liberty and be safe for the rest of the populace.

Compromise on that, or outright conflict.


I don't think it's one or the other, and there are characters who share my opinion. We see the Hero of Ferelden can ask for the Circle of Ferelden to be given its independence. The new ruler of Ferelden can declare that mages have earned the right to govern themselves. Even First Enchanter Irving, a moderate, profusely thanks the Hero for choosing to help the mages with his boon over asking the new ruler of Ferelden for a title and wealth, and even saying that he has freed mages from "their shackles," while addressing that he will make certain that this gift isn't misused. It doesn't have to be one or the other, and given the end of Dragon Age II and Asunder, the Chantry controlled Circles certainly hasn't lead to the safety of the populace.

#41
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages
A self governing Circle is still a Circle. It's still a prison where mages are taken to learn magic the "right way."

And the very fist First Enchanter that goes back on Irving's promise, or is lax about security will land the whole thing back where it once was. Out of fear of mages.

#42
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...
The controversy over the Chantry controlled Circles is much more than simple "supervision," but I take it we aren't going to have a serious discussion on this matter at all.


Supervision means that a possesed mage is put to death. Supervision means that a mage that uses blood magic is put to death. Supervision means that mages are watched so that these kinds of things can be tested and verified.


Leaving mages effectively powerless to a religious order that has "divine right" over their lives is hardly simple supervision, and it can lead to abuse, rape, torture, and illegal tranquility. It can lead to an entire population getting killed for the actions of someone who has no ties to them. There are reasons why there are mages willing to fight to be free from the Chantry controlled Circles.

the_one_54321 wrote...

As I mentioned in the last post, compromise will mean that both sides give up something. Mages are required to give up their liberty, in some fashion, in order to be safe for the general populace.


It isn't a compromise for the Chantry and the templars to have complete authority over mages. In fact, it's this authority that lead to only seven mages being permitted to engage the darkspawn at Ostagar, when Duncan wanted to recruit many more to prevent another Blight.

the_one_54321 wrote...

You want the Chantry out of the picture? Understandable, but it's not out of the picture. The Chantry is the ruling body in this. So that creates one hell of a head-butting situation.


Isn't that the entire point of where the schism has lead to? Mages v. templars.

#43
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

the_one_54321 wrote...
You want the Chantry out of the picture? Understandable, but it's not out of the picture. The Chantry is the ruling body in this. So that creates one hell of a head-butting situation.

Isn't that the entire point of where the schism has lead to? Mages v. templars.

Well, if this wasn't the state of affairs, it wouldn't be a very interesting story, now would it?

#44
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

the_one_54321 wrote...

A self governing Circle is still a Circle. It's still a prison where mages are taken to learn magic the "right way."


It's not the same if mages are governing themselves, and if mages aren't powerless against a religious authority that can threaten them with tranquility without any right to contest it.

the_one_54321 wrote...

And the very fist First Enchanter that goes back on Irving's promise, or is lax about security will land the whole thing back where it once was. Out of fear of mages.


It's a moot point given where the end of Dragon Age II and Asunder has lead both sides in this schism.

#45
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
Considering that mages are living in "dictatorships" (to quote Bioware's Michael Hamilton) where they are under the rule of a religious order that has "divine right" over their lives, I respectfully disagree.

Then I must direspectfully say you're a loon.

The entirety of Thedas is living under the dictatorship of the monarchy and have far fewer rights, benefits and opportunities compared to those who where born in nobility.

They also do not have the luxury of free food, education, shelter, work or the ability to aquire a prestigious postition.

If you're born a starving commoner, it's likely you'll die a starving commoner.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Which, as Wynne explained, leads to the Andrastian people killing mages when they blame mages for things that they weren't responsible for.

And if the mage is proven to be innocent those who killed him are likely to be punished.

If some non-smokers killed a smoker you wouldn't demand an end to anti-smoking propaganda, you'd simply have the murderers punished.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Fiona isn't the only person who has an issue with the Chantry controlled Circles, as we see from Origins, Dragon Age II, and Asunder. Even the historical account of Aldenon the Great addressed that he (and his people) fought against the Chantry and the templars because he saw the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery.

DA2's circle was corrupt and in dire need of outside intervention (although the mages weren't free of guilt either)

Origins was absolutely fine and the overwhelming majority of those within it were supportive.

I have not read Asunder.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Jowan can have freedom from the Circle of Ferelden, and even live life as Master Levyn, protecting refugees from the darkspawn. Malcolm Hawke had freedom from the Chantry controlled Circles. Apostate Hawke can have freedom from the Circle of Kirkwall, as well as Anders and Merrill. I'm not certain why you think apostates can't achieve freedom from the Chantry and its templars.

None of these people are free as they're living in slavery under the corrupt feudal system.

What's worse is they don't have the luxury of free food, education, shelter etc etc.

#46
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages
I actually felt like the writers did a beautiful job of helping us see both sides.

The mages are really easy to relate to (especially since you come from a magical family) but everywhere you go mages are acting stupid and going abomination on you. One of your best mage friends is a failed magical experiment that kills many innocents. Another is besties with a demon and it works out beautifully (not). An apostate kills someone you love dearly. Even when you side with the mages, one freaks out and pulls a disgusting trick with blood magic ("Really, dude? Weren't we winning?").

If you've ever taken Meredith's side you've heard the story of how/why she became a templar and seen her softer side. I'd still side with the mages any day of the week (maybe isn't a good enough reason to lock people up), but I felt like the game helped me understand that a single abomination can destroy a lot of people's lives - and some kind of precautionary measure is needed. The Circle is a seriously flawed system, but Thedas doesn't have anything better.

Modifié par brushyourteeth, 12 avril 2012 - 06:15 .


#47
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Considering that mages are living in "dictatorships" (to quote Bioware's Michael Hamilton) where they are under the rule of a religious order that has "divine right" over their lives, I respectfully disagree.


Then I must direspectfully say you're a loon.

The entirety of Thedas is living under the dictatorship of the monarchy and have far fewer rights, benefits and opportunities compared to those who where born in nobility.


So you're conflating people who have the right to pursue different lines of work, raise their own children, pursue romantic relationships with whomever they want to, travel to other regions, and who have the freedom to try to achieve different goals with Circle mages who lack those same rights?

GodWood wrote...

They also do not have the luxury of free food, education, shelter, work or the ability to aquire a prestigious postition.

If you're born a starving commoner, it's likely you'll die a starving commoner.


So much is denied to them, and you think having food and living in a prison makes up for that? I don't understand that argument. In real life, people have risked their lives to leave brutal dictatorships, even when they had nothing, and risked poverty. Given that mages have fled the Circle, and even fought in rebellions, I don't see how you can try to paint the Chantry controlled Circle as though it was some idyllic paradise, especially when there are characters who condemn the institution as slavery.

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Which, as Wynne explained, leads to the Andrastian people killing mages when they blame mages for things that they weren't responsible for.


And if the mage is proven to be innocent those who killed him are likely to be punished.

If some non-smokers killed a smoker you wouldn't demand an end to anti-smoking propaganda, you'd simply have the murderers punished.


Who is going to punish them? The fact that Mother Hannah needs to assure a human mage that a mob isn't going to kill him while he's trying to save the village doesn't give me the impression that people are that concerned with punishment.

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Fiona isn't the only person who has an issue with the Chantry controlled Circles, as we see from Origins, Dragon Age II, and Asunder. Even the historical account of Aldenon the Great addressed that he (and his people) fought against the Chantry and the templars because he saw the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery.


DA2's circle was corrupt and in dire need of outside intervention (although the mages weren't free of guilt either)

Origins was absolutely fine and the overwhelming majority of those within it were supportive.


We know next to nothing about the hundreds of men, women, and children in the Circle of Kirkwall. We can't praise or condemn them when we are in a place of ignorance about them. Unless you propose that the many apostate antagonists, along the few Circle mages we actually met, should condemn the majority of mages we never actually meet?

GodWood wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Jowan can have freedom from the Circle of Ferelden, and even live life as Master Levyn, protecting refugees from the darkspawn. Malcolm Hawke had freedom from the Chantry controlled Circles. Apostate Hawke can have freedom from the Circle of Kirkwall, as well as Anders and Merrill. I'm not certain why you think apostates can't achieve freedom from the Chantry and its templars.


None of these people are free as they're living in slavery under the corrupt feudal system.

What's worse is they don't have the luxury of free food, education, shelter etc etc.


They live under a monarchy, but the people have freedoms that virtually no Circle mage will ever know. I'm certain that the mages who abandon the free food, education, and shelter care more about their freedom than they do about the few privledges afforded to them under the Chantry controlled Circles, along with the many risks that come from being a mage in Andrastian society.

#48
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages

GodWood wrote...

DA2's circle was corrupt and in dire need of outside intervention (although the mages weren't free of guilt either)

Origins was absolutely fine and the overwhelming majority of those within it were supportive.


In either one of the bolded part. were you intenting templars?

#49
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
So you're conflating people who have the right to pursue different lines of work, raise their own children, pursue romantic relationships with whomever they want to, travel to other regions, and who have the freedom to try to achieve different goals with Circle mages who lack those same rights?

Circle mages can have all those rights bar having children.

True, some Circles don't allow some of those things, but others do. What the Circles need to do is have a universal set of rules for all cirlces to follow, preferably those of Fereldan's.

This would allow all those freedoms, except children.


So much is denied to them,

So much is denied to everyone. Foruntately for mages significantly less is denied to them then what is denied to others.

And you think having food and living in a prison makes up for that? I don't understand that argument.

It's not only food and shelter, its quality food and shelter, plus education, the ability to pursue the academic, the ability to wield immense power, the ability to find work, companionship, etc etc.

The common folk have little to no chance of having all this.

Really it's hardly a prison. As I've said before it's more or less a boarding school.

In real life, people have risked their lives to leave brutal dictatorships, even when they had nothing, and risked poverty.

To compare the general cirlce system to the living conditions of some of RL's most brutal dictatorships is laughable.

In these situations it's rarely the lack of excess liberty that drives these people away but rather poor living conditions, famine, war etc. 

Given that mages have fled the Circle, and even fought in rebellions, I don't see how you can try to paint the Chantry controlled Circle as though it was some idyllic paradise, especially when there are characters who condemn the institution as slavery.

When I was younger I knew kids who would run away from school and claimed it was a prison.

Circles can be corrupt yes, but people can also be entitled whiny ****es.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Who is going to punish them?

Whoever would normally punish a murderer.

LobselVith8 wrote...
We know next to nothing about the hundreds of men, women, and children in the Circle of Kirkwall. We can't praise or condemn them when we are in a place of ignorance about them. Unless you propose that the many apostate antagonists, along the few Circle mages we actually met, should condemn the majority of mages we never actually meet?

The templars were cracking down hard because many of the mages were using blood magic.

Yes, some templars went about it the wrong way but something had to be done.

LobselVith8 wrote...
They live under a monarchy, but the people have freedoms that virtually no Circle mage will ever know.

Likle what?

The freedom to starve? The freedom to sleep cold, alone and homeless? The freedom to be poor? The freedom to be mauled by the many monsters that plague the land? The freedom to be killed by bandits? The freedom to have no access to decent medical treatment?

Do I really need to go on? Yes, the life of a mage isn't the perfect paradise you seem to want it to be but but it's infinitely better then the hardships of the average commoner.

If my choices were Fereldan circle or life of the commoner, I'd pick Circle every time.

Modifié par GodWood, 12 avril 2012 - 07:26 .


#50
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
The common-folk are raped, killed, tortured and more without anybody interfering because the common-folk are worthless tools, they live their lives starving in the cold because they were born without magic or they're not noble. More so if you're an elf.

Meanwhile, the mage suffers less injustices at the hands of the Templar while they've got better quality food, they've got education, they've got a roof over their head and they're allowed to do what they please within the tower (possibly outside if they don't screw up). Those poor mages.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 12 avril 2012 - 07:39 .