439 réponses à ce sujet

[Spiritwolf1]

From the mouth of Stephen King regardings one of his book as narrated  by him... I think its fitting. I hated the ending as well but..


I’ve told my tale all the way to to the end … I can stop now … Yet some of you … are likely not so willing. You are the grim, goal-oriented ones who will not believe that the joy is in the journey rather than the destination no matter how many times it has been proven to you … I hope most of you know better. Want better. I hope you came to hear the tale, and not just munch your way through… An ending is a closed door no man … can open. I’ve written many, but most only for the same reason that I pull on my pants in the morning before leaving the bedroom — because it is the custom of the country … There is no such thing as a happy ending. I never met a single one to equal “Once upon a time.” Endings are heartless. Ending is just another word for goodbye.

[Menethra]

Dridengx wrote...

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...

MrTijger wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...

Indeed, Or maybe EA PR. He has been in like EVERY one of the threads that is nagative to EA/BW.

So, who do you two work for? Apparently you two have an obession with labelling others as plants, maybe you have insights due to your own connections to other gaming companies you like to share?

Or are you simply trolling?

I work for ** ******** ****, and he has been EVERYWHERE, it is hard to fight the feeling when his tactics are straight out of the PR troll guy handbook.

You mean, like defending the company that I've been a fan of since BG1 from ridiculous attacks based on faulty evidence, outright lies, and slanderous accusations? 

I do this, on my own free time, for no compensation, because of people like you. If you want to scream about how awful BioWare is and how much you want to see them burn, and don't want anyone stepping up to defend them... do it somewhere else. I'm a fan. These boards are for fans. You're NOT a fan. Why the hell are YOU here?

ouch. This guy Slyguy has been trolling for a month, he brings zero facts, calls everyone paid PR who reject his opinion as truth. You should learn a few tips from Reptilian Rob, least he knows how to get his points across

And whenever the word "retake" is used you dont start completely generalising and hating on us? Oh wait, you do.

[Father_Jerusalem]

slyguy200 wrote...


As for the first one, it moves painfully slow at times and is largely repetitive, so i don't really care for it and why would you
as for the second one, it is still pretty new, third one too
Fourth one, is start and stop, slow, besides i nthought that you gave up on artistic integrity, it isn't your Forte
Fifth one is pointless and not negative to BW or EA, as far as i am concerned so why would you be there
#6, is, probably being taken care of by one of your friends, And you don't work in the artistic PR department.
#7 is already locked.
#8 is like number 5
Umm, okay, guess that to prove a point those threads will be safe from you huh. I haven't been to some of those those threads.

You accused me of being in "EVERY" (your words, not mine) critical of BioWare. I simply provided evidence to prove that assertion baseless. Ergo, your credibility is effectively nil. 

That's what happens when you use hyperbole. You set yourself up for failure.

[Menethra]

slyguy200 wrote...

Dridengx wrote...

L00p wrote...

Seems to my that both slyguy (and kbct) has presented plenty of sources for their claims?

kbct is so baaaad lol. he even argues with Stanley Woo and gets owned.

KBCT is still clearly better than you. But hey, go back to your apparently terrible reality while i enjoy my fun and ejoyable reality, also do not forget to make a wild accusation and say how it is just a video-game before you go.

I'm pretty sure this guy was mocking people who let the endings get to them earlier. Something about people not being able to sleep being depressed ect while at the same time going around using a signature saying " shepard deserves better fans " well if he's the model of what a " better " fan should be count me right out.

I also noticed his tendency to post in a hit and run style.

Make a troll post, gets confronted with logic, doesn't post again.

Modifié par Menethra, 13 avril 2012 - 01:42 .

[Father_Jerusalem]

L00p wrote...

In other news - Lying or just "stretching the truth"?

For your viewing pleasure:
http://social.biowar...341589#11341589

http://masseffect.wi...ct:_Infiltrator 

Sup.

Look, of all the claims made in interviews, the most actionable one is the "Don't need Multiplayer." claim. Is it TECHNICALLY correct, given Mass Effect: Infiltrator? Yes. But if you DON'T have an iPad, you do need multiplayer in order to get it. On a truth/lie scale, this one is TECHNICALLY true, SPIRITUALLY false. And if people want to bag on BioWare for that claim - and ONLY that claim - I won't step in to fight it, because it annoys me as well. 

Holy crap, I was critical of BioWare. BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE PAID PR TROLL THERORIES? OMG HEAD ASPLODE.

[Father_Jerusalem]

slyguy200 wrote...

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...


As for the first one, it moves painfully slow at times and is largely repetitive, so i don't really care for it and why would you
as for the second one, it is still pretty new, third one too
Fourth one, is start and stop, slow, besides i nthought that you gave up on artistic integrity, it isn't your Forte
Fifth one is pointless and not negative to BW or EA, as far as i am concerned so why would you be there
#6, is, probably being taken care of by one of your friends, And you don't work in the artistic PR department.
#7 is already locked.
#8 is like number 5
Umm, okay, guess that to prove a point those threads will be safe from you huh. I haven't been to some of those those threads.

You accused me of being in "EVERY" (your words, not mine) critical of BioWare. I simply provided evidence to prove that assertion baseless. Ergo, your credibility is effectively nil. 

That's what happens when you use hyperbole. You set yourself up for failure.

Every thread in your department, basically anti-EA threads that i have seen often get attacked by you. As for the hyperbole, i only meant that most of the threads that i have seen in the last couple of days get attacked by you. unless you were dull enough to believe that i was being literal.
Credibility restored.

Um, in my "department"? Really? I have a "department" now? I participate in several different types of threads, because my interests are varied. Sorry to burst your bubble.

As for what you "meant"? What you SAID is one thing. If you're saying now that you meant something else from what you said... well, isn't that what you're attacking BioWare over? Saying one thing and meaning another?

[Gatt9]

MrTijger wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...

He has been in like all of the threads that i have seen, and he has said the same stuff.
Handbook,  look in the link i am sure that you will find just ho they do things, it isn't in a list but it is covered enough.
http://www.cinemable...izon-40885.html

I say the same stuff too, so by your logic I must also be a plant. You constantly say the same stuff as well, hence, you MUST be working for a rival company then, yes? That's your logic anyway.

Actually,  there's a tell-tale pattern to the concept.

The concept was devised as a way to alter the price of stocks during the day-trader craze in the late 90's and early 00's.  It goes like this...

The minimum required is two accounts...

Account 1 is beligerent and defends/derides the company antagonistically.  It's purpose is to agitate the board's knowledgable parties into either losing their temper and getting banned,  or into leaving due to frustration.  It's a throw-away account meant to eliminate knowledgable parties.

Account 2 is a friendly account that defends/derides the company with arguements that are likely untrue,  but require research to uncover it.  This account is meant to actually generate the intended effect by being the remaining "Voice of knowledge" after account 1 succeeds at it's goal.

Ideally,  there are 1-4 more accounts..

Account 3 is an embedded account that's been there for some period of time,  and built up credibility by posting neutral statements,  which will be "Swayed" by account 2's arguements.

Account 4 is a duplicate of 3.

Account 5 is a "New person" who will gush about the genius of Accounts 2, 3 and 4.  Possibly offering up new information inline with Account 2.

Account 6 is a duplicate of account 5.

IIRC,  this form of manipulation was such a problem with stocks that laws were passed in the U.S. regarding it.

[Menethra]

L00p wrote...

Menethra wrote...

slyguy200 wrote...

Dridengx wrote...

L00p wrote...

Seems to my that both slyguy (and kbct) has presented plenty of sources for their claims?

kbct is so baaaad lol. he even argues with Stanley Woo and gets owned.

KBCT is still clearly better than you. But hey, go back to your apparently terrible reality while i enjoy my fun and ejoyable reality, also do not forget to make a wild accusation and say how it is just a video-game before you go.

I'm pretty sure this guy was mocking people who let the endings get to them earlier. Something about people not being able to sleep being depressed ect while at the same time going around using a signature saying " shepard deserves better fans " well if he's the model of what a " better " fan should be count me right out.

I also noticed his tendency to post in a hit and run style.

Make a troll post, gets confronted with logic, doesn't post again.

If only that were the case with every troll.

He's the type of troll you only need to wave a fire stick at to beat him back under his bridge.

[Father_Jerusalem]

Point of fact.

Someone who disagrees with you =/= troll.

Just, you know, for clarity.

[Father_Jerusalem]

L00p wrote...

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

L00p wrote...

In other news - Lying or just "stretching the truth"?

For your viewing pleasure:
http://social.biowar...341589#11341589

http://masseffect.wi...ct:_Infiltrator 

Sup.

Look, of all the claims made in interviews, the most actionable one is the "Don't need Multiplayer." claim. Is it TECHNICALLY correct, given Mass Effect: Infiltrator? Yes. But if you DON'T have an iPad, you do need multiplayer in order to get it. On a truth/lie scale, this one is TECHNICALLY true, SPIRITUALLY false. And if people want to bag on BioWare for that claim - and ONLY that claim - I won't step in to fight it, because it annoys me as well. 

Holy crap, I was critical of BioWare. BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE PAID PR TROLL THERORIES? OMG HEAD ASPLODE.

Sup.

Strike three.

I'm sorry, I long since passed the point of giving a crap about anything you say.

[Father_Jerusalem]

slyguy200 wrote...

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

Point of fact.

Someone who disagrees with you =/= troll.

Just, you know, for clarity.

Common defence, dismissed.

Well, what you did, right there, is more commonly regarded as "trolling".

Just, you know, for clarity.

[Icinix]

...as for whiners changing the game.

I still hate everyone for killing off the Mako, Elevators and overheating weapons.