Aller au contenu

Photo

A guide to understanding the ending and eliminating Indoctrination Theory.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
448 réponses à ce sujet

#26
III Achilles II

III Achilles II
  • Members
  • 95 messages

SuperVulcan wrote...

Mr. Hudson has said other things about Mass Effect 3 that were not necessarily accurate. Not that I believe the IT is true. In fact, I've heard of it but never looked into it, sounds like an attempt to grasp straws.


It is interesting that people think that we are grasping at straws.

If you look into it on youtube, "Mass Effect 3: Indoc Theory (New)"

You'll see there is a ton of little nuances to ME series that point to this ending including the fact that Bioware wanted to include a Indoc in the ending.

#27
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages

III Achilles II wrote...

But if this is the end, then why is Shepard only kept alive in just the "Destroy" ending? 

Shepard wakes up and this serves no purpose if this is the end of the trilogy and Shepard will not come back. I give Bioware more credit and believe this was put in for a reason.

If you look at the cutscenes, ther is a "End03_LOndonBlueBad" that makes Big Ben blasted away by the "gentle blue wave". Is Big Ben Reaper tech, so?

I think what it means is that Shepard made "control" choice with insufficient EMS, and maybe that kills him in the process.

#28
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

III Achilles II wrote...

Let's just break this down.

Game ending- a point in the story where the narrative concludes

ME3 was promised to be an extremely amazing ending. The fight up the citadel is extremely awesome and so is the "Goodbye" to the crew. It concluded at a CLIFFHANGER. It is still an ending and your understanding of what you thought the ending would be is what is upsetting you.

You are hung up on the fact that DLC or ME4 is not an option and that's where your logic seems to bind you in your little box.

Think outside the box.

1. You are right. Reapers are still alive.
2. That means Truth DLC or ME4 will come next. Finish fight against Reapers and Collector's.


Regarding the Bioware quotes:
1. People are twisting their words.
2. If you told your gf you never wanted to get married, would you then tell her you wanted to get married before getting engaged or would you SUPRISE her with an engagement. Regardless of what was said, they planned on suprising their fans.
3. We are talking about Bioware who killed off their main character in the beginning of ME2. They've done some pretty crazy crap.
4. Many in-game items point to Indoc.
5. Bioware has had many opp. to deny Indoc.
6. Jessica has seen new content and has created a Indoc playthrough.
7. IT'S A THEORY. It's a discussion of the game. Not grasping at straws. My proof is ME1 and ME2. The writers are not idiots and I give them more credit to create such an intricate ending.
8. If you know what the ending DLC is then please post it for everyone. Otherwise, NO ONE but BIOWARE knows what the ending DLC is. IF INDOC WAS INTENDED, then they will lay it all out for people who do not understand.
9. There could be more DLC on the way. MP DLC came out this past week and they only announced it 5 days before it came out.


Very nice sum up of what kind of consensus I am trying to reach. I keep bouncing back and forth away from this and back to it.

And the devs already said in on multiple occasions: they definitely had DLC plans right from the start. So there is a lot more DLC than the last one to come.

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 13 avril 2012 - 01:27 .


#29
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

Iconoclaste wrote...

III Achilles II wrote...

But if this is the end, then why is Shepard only kept alive in just the "Destroy" ending? 

Shepard wakes up and this serves no purpose if this is the end of the trilogy and Shepard will not come back. I give Bioware more credit and believe this was put in for a reason.

If you look at the cutscenes, ther is a "End03_LOndonBlueBad" that makes Big Ben blasted away by the "gentle blue wave". Is Big Ben Reaper tech, so?

I think what it means is that Shepard made "control" choice with insufficient EMS, and maybe that kills him in the process.

Most likely deals with how many scientists you put up to work on the crucible, bad/low number of scientist=badly built crucible, wave goes wrong, blast is different, that kinda thing.

#30
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

III Achilles II wrote...

Let's just break this down.

Game ending- a point in the story where the narrative concludes

ME3 was promised to be an extremely amazing ending. The fight up the citadel is extremely awesome and so is the "Goodbye" to the crew. It concluded at a CLIFFHANGER. It is still an ending and your understanding of what you thought the ending would be is what is upsetting you.

You are hung up on the fact that DLC or ME4 is not an option and that's where your logic seems to bind you in your little box.

Think outside the box.

1. You are right. Reapers are still alive.
2. That means Truth DLC or ME4 will come next. Finish fight against Reapers and Collector's.


Regarding the Bioware quotes:
1. People are twisting their words.
2. If you told your gf you never wanted to get married, would you then tell her you wanted to get married before getting engaged or would you SUPRISE her with an engagement. Regardless of what was said, they planned on suprising their fans.
3. We are talking about Bioware who killed off their main character in the beginning of ME2. They've done some pretty crazy crap.
4. Many in-game items point to Indoc.
5. Bioware has had many opp. to deny Indoc.
6. Jessica has seen new content and has created a Indoc playthrough.
7. IT'S A THEORY. It's a discussion of the game. Not grasping at straws. My proof is ME1 and ME2. The writers are not idiots and I give them more credit to create such an intricate ending.
8. If you know what the ending DLC is then please post it for everyone. Otherwise, NO ONE but BIOWARE knows what the ending DLC is. IF INDOC WAS INTENDED, then they will lay it all out for people who do not understand.
9. There could be more DLC on the way. MP DLC came out this past week and they only announced it 5 days before it came out.


Very nice sum up of what kind of consensus I am trying to reach. I keep bouncing back and forth away from this and back to it.

And the devs already said in on multiple occasions: they definitely had DLC plans right from the start. So there is a lot more DLC than the last one to come.

DLC plans, to exist DURING ME3, not after, they already stated.

#31
adam32867

adam32867
  • Members
  • 785 messages
food for thought
https://docs.google....sle=true&pli=1#

#32
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages
If you agree with me, favorite this thead, keep it alive every now and then.

#33
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages

III Achilles II wrote...

Iconoclaste wrote...

I don't have a problem with a well argumented opinion. And I can understand IT tenants can do the same, but I bet they wont. That's too bad, because I'm sure their is some truth in IT relating to strange things happening in the game and at the end, but I'm not convinced at all about Shepard being sleeping all along.


sleeping all along? IDK about that, but the ending could have happend in a second. I have dreams that seemed forever but were like 10 minutes long.

If you haven't seen it, there is a youtube video. Search "Mass Effect: indoc theory (new)" It goes through all three games and has some GREAT POINTS with in game video and dialogue. It makes a TON of SENSE.

Dream only a few seconds, but wake-up in unexplanable rubble? The dust is still in the air, so what happened in the previous 10 seconds? That's just pushing too far something that can be explained more plainly, like OP did.

#34
KevShep

KevShep
  • Members
  • 2 332 messages

majinbuu1307 wrote...

  "This story arc is coming to an end with this game."

Remember this line from Casey Hudson.

        When you finish Mass effect 3, however you may feel about it,  it is the end, this can not be argued. 
You can not use the upcoming DLC in your argument because it STILL is the end, just further clarified; details and scenes added to make you understand better what happened to everything you cared about. They did NOT know this backlash would happen, they made that clear, meaning the ending, is really the ending. Remember this fact.



Actually they make it clear that it is not over. In the I.T. it...IS...just further clarified that its the IT.  The scenes after are shepard thinking he has won but instead the crucible maybe a weapon for the reapers to destroy all the relays as a last effort. Shepard being indoctrinated WILL see things differently like Saren in thinking he is doing  control/synthesis/destroy.

majinbuu1307 wrote...

"It’s more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things,"

This is what he meant by 16 different endings. 3 main ones with obvious differences, colors aside, with lots of smaller differences, but important onces. Such as; If you don't have enough EMS, not enough good scientists working on the Crucible, most likely not fine tuned, and when it fires, it burns the earth to a crisp basically. We'll just consider that - Bad ending #4 Other things like forces getting wiped out, that whole last battle is part of the ending. 

      Now, on to the meat. The main agreed upon part of the theory, is that Shepard does not make it to the Citadel at all, but wakes up after the beam hits(or missed but the shockwave still knocks him out, clearly he cannot get hit head on.) 
If this is true. There is one simple, simple problem, at the very START of the theory. That means, If you choose the Destroy ending(being in your head, breaking the Indoctrination) and have a high enough EMS, You see the Shep_Alive ending, theorists believing he is in the rubble in london.  Lets just believe for a minute that this is true.
(Remember first quotations by Casey) 

The Reapers, the problem since game one, are still around. He cannot shut them down, in his head. You cannot argue around this. The Reapers are still there. They will destroy everything. They cannot be defeated by conventional means.



Your forgetting that if it is the I.T. then we have YET to know what the crucible does(or who its for). We have YET to know what to find on the citadel...we could even find Vigil (from ME1) after the O.S.D. file was put on the citadel in ME1. There are too many unknowns.

majinbuu1307 wrote...


                        This means the game is unfinished, what happens after Shep wakes up? Does he try to go to the Citadel for real this time? Seems a bit redundant. Why show what happens after he breaks control?(the Crucible firing, relays disabled, etc etc) Seems weird for him to dream that too, if he already broke control eh? Re-read this part, more than once, and the previous paragraph, again and again, before you think of a counter argument.

 
Like I said If he is indoctrinated then he (and you the player) are ONLY going to see what the reapers want you to see. Remember that this is also about the player (the person or you) being "indoctrinated" (tricked). 

majinbuu1307 wrote...

    Now, with that said, dismissing indoctrination theory, the other theory, is that Shepard survived reentry, and lands in London rubble. I won't even argue this. It's too rediculous.

     Finally, the most logical answer out of the three possibilities most have presented. Shepard is ACTUALLY on the Citadel, those events happened, and this is closure, however you may feel about the ending. Shepard chooses Destroy, blows up the tube/device, gets covered by an explosion(which we have seen people survive worse, game one, Shepard had a Reaper leg fall on him pretty much, game two, didn't incinerate during reentry)
      The rest is off screen, we have no idea what happens, we have no idea if Shepard was just covered in the explosion but made it out and start running, he did have a sudden burst of confidence and energy and was no longer limping as he walked and shot the tube. It is very possible he came out of that small burst and ran to an exit, possibly one created by the Catalyst once again.

    Still following? Hope so.  Now, if  he found an exit off that platform, we have some hope, but the ending scene shows some explosions around where shepard is supposed to be, but we do not, I repeat, we DO NOT see it the ring break to peices, or even break at all, suggesting much of it is very much intact on the inside. The arms then come apart, and it is still in orbit last we see. 

       This means he could very well be alive, and in CITADEL rubble, not LONDON rubble. I'll leave the silly argument about what the rubble and cords looks like to the nitpickers. Fact is it is too close a shot to see for certain. Even Jessica M. states her belief(while not GOD) is that Shep is on the Citadel. And she has seen content that none of us have, so she is alittle more in the loop than we are. (oh dear I brought her up, so now thats all you will talk about and ignore the rest of my thread, go ahead children.).


To point a few things out I will start with the fact that shepards in space with no helmet and seems to NOT question the catalyst...almost as if it was a dream(because things make sense in dreams).

2)  You can clearly hear male/female shepard's voice in the back ground of the catalyst's OWN voice! You have to hear it with headphones...The right ear pice is male shep and the left ear pice is female shep and when you hear them together you cant make it out at all. Why is this?

3) If they were never going to do a "Explanation DLC" then they were never going to explain the reason the catalyst is the little boy! Or the many plot holes they they had time to see.

4) shepard is having dreams all throught the game and the last 10 minutes of a great game feels really really off (out of place) of the rest of the series...Why? There is a really really good chance that he IS dreaming since the last 10 min feels that way on purpose.

5) If you go back and look at the rubble on London it is gray brincks on the sides as your running for the beam...the citadel is NOT made with brincks. BTW Shepard is now taking a breath in a broken citadel with no power in the vaccume of space?



majinbuu1307 wrote...



                          To sum up, Destroy ending is by far the best ending, and the further Extended Cut will let us know other details, possibly how Shep can meet up with crew and LI, or if rebuilding of the Relays is possible.







Anddddd...thats a wrap. Have a blast.:wizard:


You have been indoctrinated by BioWare!

Modifié par KevShep, 13 avril 2012 - 01:39 .


#35
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

adam32867 wrote...

food for thought
https://docs.google....sle=true&pli=1#

Read your link, organized is good:) but I stil have to disagree. Stuff like them saying "Oh god, they are all gone"  You could just argue that they are far away and can't see shepard  on the ground still alive, Anderson could have very well been knocked into the beam by the blast, or, as he said followed him up, being a single person some people might not spot you from far distances. As for the whole how did he get in front of you? He was beamed to another area, things where moving, shifting, more than one hallway leading to the chasm and then the control panel, things could shift again around him after he got there. Ilusive man was obviously there for a while waiting. He has his ways.

#36
kal_reegar

kal_reegar
  • Members
  • 479 messages

majinbuu1307 wrote...

kal_reegar wrote...

you're right, IF the end we've seen is the end of the trilogy, indoc theory makes no sense. It's pointless and useless

but casey's words aren't an immutable dogma, he can still change his mind.
CASEY/BIOWARE, IT'S NOT OVER YET! YOU CAN STILL REDIME YOURSELF! ;)


Think you mean Redeem:P but yeah, the ending makes sense if you actually look into everything, took me a while, but I got past the rage and understood the ending. Indoc theory just makes everything, well, stupid.


yes, redeem. Sorry my english is bad :) 

But imho the ending makes little sense. Plot holes and space magic everywhere. Everybody act strangely. Too many questions, too many bad answers
If you want the ending makes sense, you have to accept things I'm not yet willing to accept.

so, I support indoc theory.
it is an act of faith, of course. But you must admit that there all A LOT of little details that may not be meaningless.

#37
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

Iconoclaste wrote...

III Achilles II wrote...

Iconoclaste wrote...

I don't have a problem with a well argumented opinion. And I can understand IT tenants can do the same, but I bet they wont. That's too bad, because I'm sure their is some truth in IT relating to strange things happening in the game and at the end, but I'm not convinced at all about Shepard being sleeping all along.


sleeping all along? IDK about that, but the ending could have happend in a second. I have dreams that seemed forever but were like 10 minutes long.

If you haven't seen it, there is a youtube video. Search "Mass Effect: indoc theory (new)" It goes through all three games and has some GREAT POINTS with in game video and dialogue. It makes a TON of SENSE.

Dream only a few seconds, but wake-up in unexplanable rubble? The dust is still in the air, so what happened in the previous 10 seconds? That's just pushing too far something that can be explained more plainly, like OP did.

Why thank you:)

#38
SuperVulcan

SuperVulcan
  • Members
  • 1 032 messages

III Achilles II wrote...

SuperVulcan wrote...

Mr. Hudson has said other things about Mass Effect 3 that were not necessarily accurate. Not that I believe the IT is true. In fact, I've heard of it but never looked into it, sounds like an attempt to grasp straws.


It is interesting that people think that we are grasping at straws.

If you look into it on youtube, "Mass Effect 3: Indoc Theory (New)"

You'll see there is a ton of little nuances to ME series that point to this ending including the fact that Bioware wanted to include a Indoc in the ending.

I'm not trying to offend anyone. I am aware they had planned an Indoc in the ending, but I'm not going to believe something that Bioware hasn't confirmed. Although it is interesting that they know about it and have not denied it yet.

#39
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

SuperVulcan wrote...

III Achilles II wrote...

SuperVulcan wrote...

Mr. Hudson has said other things about Mass Effect 3 that were not necessarily accurate. Not that I believe the IT is true. In fact, I've heard of it but never looked into it, sounds like an attempt to grasp straws.


It is interesting that people think that we are grasping at straws.

If you look into it on youtube, "Mass Effect 3: Indoc Theory (New)"

You'll see there is a ton of little nuances to ME series that point to this ending including the fact that Bioware wanted to include a Indoc in the ending.

I'm not trying to offend anyone. I am aware they had planned an Indoc in the ending, but I'm not going to believe something that Bioware hasn't confirmed. Although it is interesting that they know about it and have not denied it yet.

Or confirmed, they want Spekulachuns.^_^

#40
hoodaticus

hoodaticus
  • Members
  • 2 025 messages

III Achilles II wrote...

Let's look empircally. Name another hero on another console who's game's stopped at 3. Zelda, Samus, Mario, Snake, etc.

But one interesting example is HALO. A triliogy is what they said and guess who is the star of Halo 4. MC.
The other interesting thing is the ending of 3 left fans with a CLIFFHANGER THAT MC WAS ALIVE.

Sound familiar.

If Bioware wanted to suprise their fans, who announce it early instead of just leaving a cliffhanger at ME3 that shows Shepard alive. He is either coming back in DLC or ME4.


If Bioware brings Shepard back for ME4 to finish off the Reapers, I am going to send the people who made that decision a bunch of bribe/reward money payable to them personally.

On the other hand, if they want to take a break and give us prequels to further build up the finale - with the last prequel being the Skyllian Blitz - I would be gung-ho  especially if they indicated to us that the war with the reapers was still on the horizon - a second trilogy for Shepard.  And a reason to hold on to our ME3 saves.

Oh goodness Bioware, think of the legend!  Think of the MONEY!

#41
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages

KevShep wrote...

To point a few things out I will start with the fact that shepards in space with no helmet and seems to NOT question the catalyst...almost as if it was a dream(because things make sense in dreams).

Well the WHOLE Citadel, during all 3 games, is "open skies". Read the Codex, and start from there to reach a plausible conclusion. Has Shepard been in a dream each time he was on the Citadel because he could "breathe in space"?

KevShep wrote...

2)  You can clearly hear male/female shepard's voice in the back ground of the catalyst's OWN voice! You have to hear it with headphones...The right ear pice is male shep and the left ear pice is female shep and when you hear them together you can make it out at all. Why is this?

Then, why would a male player hear fem. Shepard, or vice versa? Should they have taken Liara's voice to make it sound more "likely"? He could very much be at "fight" with spirits right there and then, but that does not mean that what he SEES is not there.

KevShep wrote...

3) If they were never going to do a "Explanation DLC" then they were never going to explain the reason the catalyst is the little boy! Or the many plot holes they they had time to see.

Maybe they expected something, but not that much shouting around. They acknowledge that at PAX. They needed some feedback to adjust, and that doesn't mean that ALL of IT is out.

KevShep wrote...

4) shepard is having dreams all throught the game and the last 10 minutes of a great game feels really really off (out of place) of the rest of the series...Why? There is a really really good chance that he IS dreaming since the last 10 min feels that way on purpose.

Many others have explained this by Shepard being simply on the line between life and death. Every time someone threw a stun grenade at me, I felt way more dizzy than in the end! Then again, being slo-mo and debilitated from pain does not mean IT is ALL out. He might still be confused and slowed down by indoc, but he still is enough awake and living to act and talk.

KevShep wrote...

5) If you go back and look at the rubble on London it is gray brincks on the sides as your running for the beam...the citadel is NOT made with brincks. BTW Shepard is now taking a breath in a broken citadel with no power in the vaccume of space?

This has been covered. Is the Citadel made of plastic? Cardboard? Styrofoam? Codex tells us it's made of an "unknown resilient material". That could as well be it, and from the pictures I put on another thread, we can easily see the bad render on the slide of big chunks, making it impossible to say its either concrete or Citadel's semi-porous stuff.

#42
elegolas1

elegolas1
  • Members
  • 341 messages
i've got a feeling the clarifying dlc will neither prove nor disprove the IT. it will explain the plotholes but also leave enough room to interpret indoctrination. the IT is exactly the kind of speculation that bioware intended, the dlc will only encourage that kind of speculation while clearing up some of the messy parts, hell all of the ending

#43
hoodaticus

hoodaticus
  • Members
  • 2 025 messages
And to be clear - the last installment of the prequels should let you play as young Shepard, saving Elysium single-handed.

#44
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

hoodaticus wrote...

And to be clear - the last installment of the prequels should let you play as young Shepard, saving Elysium single-handed.

But how would you import your shep:P code still>?

#45
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages
bump

#46
hoodaticus

hoodaticus
  • Members
  • 2 025 messages
@majin

It wouldn't be an import - it would be a merge. You get bonuses a la ME2.

#47
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages
I just want to point out that, even "broken", the Citadel is not a glass bottle : each arm HAS to have it's own survival systems and gravity fields, because of the 7m limitation of height of the artificial atmosphere. If the "survival systems" and "gravity fields generators" were based in the center ring, how could they maintain anything at the end of the 25km arms, and not in the middle, when the arms are closed?

By the way, this point is far from the strongest evidence IT has to propose : during all 3 games, Shepard steps out of the shuttle in places seemingly devoid of atmosphere, but he just has to say "Okay to remove helmets here", and that's it. There are just too many inconsistencies regarding the tech to suppose that, just in the end, Bioware made that one on purpose. Even the Crucible coming from two opposite directions to "dock" is evidence that, to a good amount, Bioware was not reviewing everything in the minute details like the most ardent IT tenants would like to  believe.

Modifié par Iconoclaste, 13 avril 2012 - 02:02 .


#48
KevShep

KevShep
  • Members
  • 2 332 messages

Iconoclaste wrote...


Well the WHOLE Citadel, during all 3 games, is "open skies". Read the Codex, and start from there to reach a plausible conclusion. Has Shepard been in a dream each time he was on the Citadel because he could "breathe in space"?


Your not paying attention. At the final scene he is in OPEN space talking to the catalyst(space is a vaccume)!

Iconoclaste wrote...

Then, why would a male player hear fem. Shepard, or vice versa? Should they have taken Liara's voice to make it sound more "likely"? He could very much be at "fight" with spirits right there and then, but that does not mean that what he SEES is not there.

 
You CAN hear both no matter what you are it is the fact that it...IS...shepards voice which means that it is all in his/her head! Remember, you can hear both because it is Bioware's way of reaching to the player if they are paying attention.

Iconoclaste wrote...

Maybe they expected something, but not that much shouting around. They acknowledge that at PAX. They needed some feedback to adjust, and that doesn't mean that ALL of IT is out.

Many others have explained this by Shepard being simply on the line between life and death. Every time someone threw a stun grenade at me, I felt way more dizzy than in the end! Then again, being slo-mo and debilitated from pain does not mean IT is ALL out. He might still be confused and slowed down by indoc, but he still is enough awake and living to act and talk..


Unless your in a dream controled by Harbinger...Then you WILL think that it is real, The boy even goes so far as to tell him/her at the start to "wake up". Your still frogetting that there is a reason for those dreams dude, and they are centered around the kid!  1+1=2

Iconoclaste wrote...
This has been covered. Is the Citadel made of plastic? Cardboard? Styrofoam? Codex tells us it's made of an "unknown resilient material". That could as well be it, and from the pictures I put on another thread, we can easily see the bad render on the slide of big chunks, making it impossible to say its either concrete or Citadel's semi-porous stuff.



Dude!...You can clearly see BRICKS!!!!!!!!!

#49
Iconoclaste

Iconoclaste
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages
This is taken from the link provided on first page :

4. Shepard awakens much, much closer to the Citadel beam than she was when knocked out by the laser blast.

The laser hit between Shepard and the Citadel beam. The way physics and explosions work is that you are propelled away from the source of a blast, not closer to a point beyond the epicenter of the explosion. Sorry, that one was kind of geeky!

Since when does a laser idoes "explosion" damage? This is the kind of argument that takes credit AWAY from IT. Once again, there's nothing wrong to believe Shepard is being "played upon" by Reapers in the end. But to try to justify it by all means, even if unsound reasoning or too easily countered, is counter-productive. The quantity of points supporting IT is not as relevant as their quality.

#50
majinbuu1307

majinbuu1307
  • Members
  • 624 messages

hoodaticus wrote...

@majin

It wouldn't be an import - it would be a merge. You get bonuses a la ME2.

Would love to see what happened on Akuze and such :)