If you do research on subjects, or have attended classes where professors teach on subjects, you can learn a lot about something (even a book) without reading it.
I can take the word of the author and of literary critics (that is, educated people who make analysis of literature their occupation, not book reviewers or anyone of different professions trying to read into a book) and accept what they were writing about is what they said they were writing about.
I'm not sure David's (and the rest of Bioware's) take on the truth of elves, the Maker (God), etc., is exactly -
but my reading of the books and the game is that there is ambiguity PURPOSEFULLY written into these backgrounds and histories. Part of that may be so the audience (those reading the books and playing the games) can take away from it what they will (like deciding if you think Morrigan or Leliana are right in their discussion about the Maker), but I think that it is strongly hinted that the "taught" beliefs of many of these established groups (the Chantry, the Dalish elves, the Dwarves) are more tradition than fact.
I think it is very possible that mages did NOT invade the Golden City at all.
I think it is very possible that Andraste was never really the bride of the Maker.
AND I think it is very possible that, in Thedas, elves were never really immortal. Their tales of being immortal could well be "the good old days" of lost innocence / purity. Like how in the Judeo-Christian tradition humans used to live to be hundreds of years old - from outside those who believe the scriptures, many scholars would see this as a literary device.
In short, even IF the elves of DAO were once immortal and "Tolkien perfect" - the story and world at least gives the appearance that maybe that is all as fake as - well, no spoilers.
Modifié par MerinTB, 06 décembre 2009 - 10:11 .